症状性颈动脉网颈动脉重建术后的结果:一项多机构队列研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael T Bounajem, Allison Liang, Annie Trang, Bachar El Baba, Tyler M Bielinski, Karl Sangwon, Yuchong Zhang, Daniel Wiggan, Eric Grin, Avi Gajjar, Christopher R Pasarikovski, Victor Xd Yang, Ronit Agid, Michael Levitt, Matthew Anderson, Raymond M Meyer, Jacob Cherian, Brian Howard, Philipp Hendrix, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Visish Srinivasan, Kareem El Naamani, M Reid Gooch, Erez Nossek, Ramesh Grandhi
{"title":"症状性颈动脉网颈动脉重建术后的结果:一项多机构队列研究。","authors":"Michael T Bounajem, Allison Liang, Annie Trang, Bachar El Baba, Tyler M Bielinski, Karl Sangwon, Yuchong Zhang, Daniel Wiggan, Eric Grin, Avi Gajjar, Christopher R Pasarikovski, Victor Xd Yang, Ronit Agid, Michael Levitt, Matthew Anderson, Raymond M Meyer, Jacob Cherian, Brian Howard, Philipp Hendrix, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Visish Srinivasan, Kareem El Naamani, M Reid Gooch, Erez Nossek, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251365529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251365529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael T Bounajem, Allison Liang, Annie Trang, Bachar El Baba, Tyler M Bielinski, Karl Sangwon, Yuchong Zhang, Daniel Wiggan, Eric Grin, Avi Gajjar, Christopher R Pasarikovski, Victor Xd Yang, Ronit Agid, Michael Levitt, Matthew Anderson, Raymond M Meyer, Jacob Cherian, Brian Howard, Philipp Hendrix, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Visish Srinivasan, Kareem El Naamani, M Reid Gooch, Erez Nossek, Ramesh Grandhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251365529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251365529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251365529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251365529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的颈动脉网可作为血栓形成和继发血栓栓塞性脑卒中的中心。虽然治疗历史上包括抗血小板治疗,但最近的证据表明,尽管有最好的药物治疗,卒中复发率仍显著升高。我们检查了颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)的安全性和有效性,其中包括在动脉中放置一个线圈,以及颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),一种去除血栓的手术,用于治疗症状性颈动脉网。方法对有同侧急性缺血性脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)病史的成年颈动脉网患者进行多机构回顾性分析,其中包括颈动脉支架置入术或动脉内膜切除术。收集患者人口统计资料、合并症、临床表现、治疗方法和随访结果。结果71例患者(平均年龄52.4岁,女性44例(62.4%),CEA 23例(32.4%),CAS 48例(67.6%)。最常见的症状是半身麻木/无力、失语和视线偏离。患者在干预前平均发生1.12±0.7次卒中或TIA,从首次卒中/TIA到干预平均延迟115±224天。干预前修正Rankin量表(mRS)得分中位数为2分。围手术期1例(1.41%)发生脑卒中,无心肌梗死。在平均14.8(±29.2)个月的随访中,1例患者出现无症状卒中复发(1.41%)。随访时中位mRS为1,颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术术后并发症和卒中复发率相似。结论颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术对于减少因颈动脉织带导致的卒中或TIA患者的卒中风险是安全有效的,值得进一步研究以确定最佳的治疗时机和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study.

ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信