Yun Seok Yang, Chul Kwon Lim, Jae Young Kwack, Jun-Hyeok Kang, Seong Hee Kim, Kwan Young Oh
{"title":"等压NOTES子宫切除术:经阴道NOTES子宫切除术的替代方法。","authors":"Yun Seok Yang, Chul Kwon Lim, Jae Young Kwack, Jun-Hyeok Kang, Seong Hee Kim, Kwan Young Oh","doi":"10.5468/ogs.25036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for hysterectomy conventionally requires CO2 pneumoperitoneum via a transvaginal port, presenting challenges such as gas leakage and increased procedural complexity. We introduced isobaric NOTES hysterectomy (iNH) as an alternative to transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy (vNH) to eliminate the need for CO2 pneumoperitoneum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2014 and July 2018, 137 patients with benign uterine conditions underwent iNH or single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (SP-LAVH). Clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 137 patients, 59 underwent iNH and 78 underwent SP-LAVH. All iNH procedures were completed without conversion, except for one hybrid NOTES case, with no intraoperative complications reported in the iNH group. While the median operative times and uterine weights were comparable between the groups, iNH demonstrated significantly lower median blood loss, reduced hemoglobin changes on postoperative day 1, and shorter hospital stay than SP-LAVH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a single-hole vaginal platform without pneumoperitoneum, iNH combines the simplicity of vaginal hysterectomy with the visual advantages of vNH. Therefore, it is a distinct method within the transvaginal hysterectomy spectrum. Further studies are warranted to delineate the specific iNH advantages over conventional pneumoperitoneum-based vNOTES.</p>","PeriodicalId":37602,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","volume":" ","pages":"433-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isobaric NOTES hysterectomy: an alternative to transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Seok Yang, Chul Kwon Lim, Jae Young Kwack, Jun-Hyeok Kang, Seong Hee Kim, Kwan Young Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.5468/ogs.25036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for hysterectomy conventionally requires CO2 pneumoperitoneum via a transvaginal port, presenting challenges such as gas leakage and increased procedural complexity. We introduced isobaric NOTES hysterectomy (iNH) as an alternative to transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy (vNH) to eliminate the need for CO2 pneumoperitoneum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2014 and July 2018, 137 patients with benign uterine conditions underwent iNH or single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (SP-LAVH). Clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 137 patients, 59 underwent iNH and 78 underwent SP-LAVH. All iNH procedures were completed without conversion, except for one hybrid NOTES case, with no intraoperative complications reported in the iNH group. While the median operative times and uterine weights were comparable between the groups, iNH demonstrated significantly lower median blood loss, reduced hemoglobin changes on postoperative day 1, and shorter hospital stay than SP-LAVH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a single-hole vaginal platform without pneumoperitoneum, iNH combines the simplicity of vaginal hysterectomy with the visual advantages of vNH. Therefore, it is a distinct method within the transvaginal hysterectomy spectrum. Further studies are warranted to delineate the specific iNH advantages over conventional pneumoperitoneum-based vNOTES.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463478/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.25036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Isobaric NOTES hysterectomy: an alternative to transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy.
Objective: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for hysterectomy conventionally requires CO2 pneumoperitoneum via a transvaginal port, presenting challenges such as gas leakage and increased procedural complexity. We introduced isobaric NOTES hysterectomy (iNH) as an alternative to transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy (vNH) to eliminate the need for CO2 pneumoperitoneum.
Methods: Between December 2014 and July 2018, 137 patients with benign uterine conditions underwent iNH or single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies (SP-LAVH). Clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared.
Results: Of 137 patients, 59 underwent iNH and 78 underwent SP-LAVH. All iNH procedures were completed without conversion, except for one hybrid NOTES case, with no intraoperative complications reported in the iNH group. While the median operative times and uterine weights were comparable between the groups, iNH demonstrated significantly lower median blood loss, reduced hemoglobin changes on postoperative day 1, and shorter hospital stay than SP-LAVH.
Conclusion: Using a single-hole vaginal platform without pneumoperitoneum, iNH combines the simplicity of vaginal hysterectomy with the visual advantages of vNH. Therefore, it is a distinct method within the transvaginal hysterectomy spectrum. Further studies are warranted to delineate the specific iNH advantages over conventional pneumoperitoneum-based vNOTES.
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science (NLM title: Obstet Gynecol Sci) is an international peer-review journal that published basic, translational, clinical research, and clinical practice guideline to promote women’s health and prevent obstetric and gynecologic disorders. The journal has an international editorial board and is published in English on the 15th day of every other month. Submitted manuscripts should not contain previously published material and should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. The journal has been publishing articles since 1958. The aim of the journal is to publish original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and video articles that have the potential to change the practices in women''s health care. The journal’s main focus is the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetric and gynecologic disorders. Because the life expectancy of Korean and Asian women is increasing, the journal''s editors are particularly interested in the health of elderly women in these population groups. The journal also publishes articles about reproductive biology, stem cell research, and artificial intelligence research for women; additionally, it provides insights into the physiology and mechanisms of obstetric and gynecologic diseases.