成人发病的孤立性颈肌张力障碍是否需要常规神经影像学检查?

IF 2.1 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5334/tohm.1049
Elina Myller, Oskari Korhonen, Juho Joutsa
{"title":"成人发病的孤立性颈肌张力障碍是否需要常规神经影像学检查?","authors":"Elina Myller, Oskari Korhonen, Juho Joutsa","doi":"10.5334/tohm.1049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practices regarding neuroimaging in isolated cervical dystonia vary across countries and there are no published studies investigating the need of routine neuroimaging in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate if structural neuroimaging is needed in patients with isolated cervical dystonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with adult-onset cervical dystonia were identified from a systematic search of the medical records of Turku University Hospital 1996-2022. Clinical and structural neuroimaging data were reviewed by the investigators to evaluate the etiology of dystonia, specifically to identify cases of secondary dystonia caused by structural brain abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>365 patients with cervical dystonia without other movement disorders with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging were identified. 282 (77.3%) were scanned using head MRI or CT. Acquired brain lesions were identified in nine (2.5% of all patients) and were significantly more common in patients with vs. without (i.e. isolated) other neurological features (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Lesions in patients with other neurological features were considered likely (n = 4) or possibly (n = 2) causal, but all lesions in patients with isolated cervical dystonia (n = 3) were considered incidental. None of the patients showed signs of progressive neurodegeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with adult-onset isolated cervical dystonia.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Studies investigating the need of structural neuroimaging in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia are scarce and opinions on this issue are divided among experts.In this study, we reviewed clinical and imaging data of all patients with cervical dystonia with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging treated at a regional tertiary care hospital between 1996-2022 to investigate the yield of structural brain imaging in these patients.Of the included 365 patients, none showed evidence of progressive neurodegeneration underlying the symptoms and only six (1.6%) showed acquired brain lesions that were considered possibly or likely causal for cervical dystonia.All the six patients with possible or likely lesion-induced cervical dystonia showed cervical dystonia combined with other neurological features, indicating that routine neuroimaging is not needed in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":"15 ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Routine Neuroimaging Needed in Adult-Onset Isolated Cervical Dystonia?\",\"authors\":\"Elina Myller, Oskari Korhonen, Juho Joutsa\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/tohm.1049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practices regarding neuroimaging in isolated cervical dystonia vary across countries and there are no published studies investigating the need of routine neuroimaging in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate if structural neuroimaging is needed in patients with isolated cervical dystonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with adult-onset cervical dystonia were identified from a systematic search of the medical records of Turku University Hospital 1996-2022. Clinical and structural neuroimaging data were reviewed by the investigators to evaluate the etiology of dystonia, specifically to identify cases of secondary dystonia caused by structural brain abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>365 patients with cervical dystonia without other movement disorders with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging were identified. 282 (77.3%) were scanned using head MRI or CT. Acquired brain lesions were identified in nine (2.5% of all patients) and were significantly more common in patients with vs. without (i.e. isolated) other neurological features (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Lesions in patients with other neurological features were considered likely (n = 4) or possibly (n = 2) causal, but all lesions in patients with isolated cervical dystonia (n = 3) were considered incidental. None of the patients showed signs of progressive neurodegeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with adult-onset isolated cervical dystonia.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Studies investigating the need of structural neuroimaging in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia are scarce and opinions on this issue are divided among experts.In this study, we reviewed clinical and imaging data of all patients with cervical dystonia with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging treated at a regional tertiary care hospital between 1996-2022 to investigate the yield of structural brain imaging in these patients.Of the included 365 patients, none showed evidence of progressive neurodegeneration underlying the symptoms and only six (1.6%) showed acquired brain lesions that were considered possibly or likely causal for cervical dystonia.All the six patients with possible or likely lesion-induced cervical dystonia showed cervical dystonia combined with other neurological features, indicating that routine neuroimaging is not needed in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.1049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.1049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各国关于孤立性颈肌张力障碍的神经影像学临床实践各不相同,目前还没有发表的研究调查该患者群体常规神经影像学的必要性。目的:探讨孤立性颈肌张力障碍患者是否需要结构神经影像学检查。方法:系统检索图尔库大学医院1996-2022年的医疗记录,确定成人发病的宫颈肌张力障碍患者。研究人员回顾了临床和结构神经影像学资料,以评估肌张力障碍的病因,特别是识别由结构性脑异常引起的继发性肌张力障碍病例。结果:365例无其他运动障碍的颈肌张力障碍患者,在脑成像前推定为特发性或病因不确定。282例(77.3%)行头部MRI或CT扫描。9例(占所有患者的2.5%)发现了获得性脑病变,并且在有(即孤立的)其他神经功能的患者中比没有(即孤立的)其他神经功能的患者更常见(P < 0.001)。有其他神经系统特征的患者的病变被认为是可能的(n = 4)或可能的(n = 2)原因,但孤立性颈肌张力障碍患者的所有病变(n = 3)被认为是偶然的。没有患者表现出进行性神经变性的迹象。结论:成人发病的孤立性颈肌张力障碍患者无需常规神经影像学检查。重点:研究孤立的成人发病的颈椎肌张力障碍是否需要结构神经成像的研究很少,专家对此问题的看法也存在分歧。在这项研究中,我们回顾了1996年至2022年期间在一家地区三级医院接受脑成像治疗的所有推定为特发性或病因不明的颈椎肌张力障碍患者的临床和影像学资料,以调查这些患者的结构脑成像率。在纳入的365例患者中,没有证据表明症状背后存在进行性神经变性,只有6例(1.6%)显示可能或可能导致颈肌张力障碍的后发性脑病变。所有6例可能或可能由病变引起的颈张力障碍患者均表现出颈张力障碍合并其他神经学特征,提示孤立的、成人发病的颈张力障碍不需要常规神经影像学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is Routine Neuroimaging Needed in Adult-Onset Isolated Cervical Dystonia?

Is Routine Neuroimaging Needed in Adult-Onset Isolated Cervical Dystonia?

Is Routine Neuroimaging Needed in Adult-Onset Isolated Cervical Dystonia?

Background: Clinical practices regarding neuroimaging in isolated cervical dystonia vary across countries and there are no published studies investigating the need of routine neuroimaging in this patient population.

Objectives: To investigate if structural neuroimaging is needed in patients with isolated cervical dystonia.

Methods: Patients with adult-onset cervical dystonia were identified from a systematic search of the medical records of Turku University Hospital 1996-2022. Clinical and structural neuroimaging data were reviewed by the investigators to evaluate the etiology of dystonia, specifically to identify cases of secondary dystonia caused by structural brain abnormalities.

Results: 365 patients with cervical dystonia without other movement disorders with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging were identified. 282 (77.3%) were scanned using head MRI or CT. Acquired brain lesions were identified in nine (2.5% of all patients) and were significantly more common in patients with vs. without (i.e. isolated) other neurological features (P < 0.001). Lesions in patients with other neurological features were considered likely (n = 4) or possibly (n = 2) causal, but all lesions in patients with isolated cervical dystonia (n = 3) were considered incidental. None of the patients showed signs of progressive neurodegeneration.

Conclusions: Routine neuroimaging is not necessary in patients with adult-onset isolated cervical dystonia.

Highlights: Studies investigating the need of structural neuroimaging in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia are scarce and opinions on this issue are divided among experts.In this study, we reviewed clinical and imaging data of all patients with cervical dystonia with presumed idiopathic or uncertain etiology prior to brain imaging treated at a regional tertiary care hospital between 1996-2022 to investigate the yield of structural brain imaging in these patients.Of the included 365 patients, none showed evidence of progressive neurodegeneration underlying the symptoms and only six (1.6%) showed acquired brain lesions that were considered possibly or likely causal for cervical dystonia.All the six patients with possible or likely lesion-induced cervical dystonia showed cervical dystonia combined with other neurological features, indicating that routine neuroimaging is not needed in isolated, adult-onset cervical dystonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信