Uğur Önal, Ülkü Tüzemen, Pınar Küçükdemirci Kaya, Deniz Mercan, Funda Aslan, Gül Çalışkan, Remzi İşçimen, Cüneyt Özakın, Halis Akalın
{"title":"头孢他啶阿维巴坦治疗相关感染期间对耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌定植的影响。","authors":"Uğur Önal, Ülkü Tüzemen, Pınar Küçükdemirci Kaya, Deniz Mercan, Funda Aslan, Gül Çalışkan, Remzi İşçimen, Cüneyt Özakın, Halis Akalın","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-14817-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), particularly carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC), are significant pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections. This retrospective study assesses the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in achieving perianal swab (PAS) negativity compared to other treatments, including colistin, polymyxin B, meropenem, and combinations with fosfomycin. We retrospectively analyzed 147 CRE-colonized patients (76 females) screened with PAS samples from January 14, 2021, to April 27, 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with CAZ/AVI (n = 40) and those receiving alternative treatments (n = 44) for bloodstream infections or ventilator associated pneumonia caused by CRE. PAS negativity was defined as conversion from positive to negative, while relapse was a positive PAS result after initial negativity. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The CAZ/AVI group achieved a higher rate of PAS negativity (32 patients) with a median time to PAS negativity of 1 week. Relapse rates were similar between CAZ/AVI (23/24) and non-CAZ/AVI groups (8/10). Significant differences in PAS negativity were observed at two weeks (p < 0.001) but not at four weeks (p = 0.492). The median time to PAS negativity was shorter in the CAZ/AVI group (1 week) compared to the non-CAZ/AVI group (2 weeks; p = 0.027). CAZ/AVI is more effective than alternative treatments for short-term PAS negativity, but relapse rates are comparable, highlighting challenges in long-term CRE management. Continuous surveillance and personalized decolonization strategies are essential. Further research is needed to investigate relapse mechanisms and evaluate combination therapies or novel strategies for sustained decolonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of ceftazidime avibactam on colonization by carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales during treatment of related infections.\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Önal, Ülkü Tüzemen, Pınar Küçükdemirci Kaya, Deniz Mercan, Funda Aslan, Gül Çalışkan, Remzi İşçimen, Cüneyt Özakın, Halis Akalın\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-14817-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), particularly carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC), are significant pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections. This retrospective study assesses the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in achieving perianal swab (PAS) negativity compared to other treatments, including colistin, polymyxin B, meropenem, and combinations with fosfomycin. We retrospectively analyzed 147 CRE-colonized patients (76 females) screened with PAS samples from January 14, 2021, to April 27, 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with CAZ/AVI (n = 40) and those receiving alternative treatments (n = 44) for bloodstream infections or ventilator associated pneumonia caused by CRE. PAS negativity was defined as conversion from positive to negative, while relapse was a positive PAS result after initial negativity. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The CAZ/AVI group achieved a higher rate of PAS negativity (32 patients) with a median time to PAS negativity of 1 week. Relapse rates were similar between CAZ/AVI (23/24) and non-CAZ/AVI groups (8/10). Significant differences in PAS negativity were observed at two weeks (p < 0.001) but not at four weeks (p = 0.492). The median time to PAS negativity was shorter in the CAZ/AVI group (1 week) compared to the non-CAZ/AVI group (2 weeks; p = 0.027). CAZ/AVI is more effective than alternative treatments for short-term PAS negativity, but relapse rates are comparable, highlighting challenges in long-term CRE management. Continuous surveillance and personalized decolonization strategies are essential. Further research is needed to investigate relapse mechanisms and evaluate combination therapies or novel strategies for sustained decolonization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"28935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14817-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14817-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of ceftazidime avibactam on colonization by carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales during treatment of related infections.
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), particularly carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC), are significant pathogens causing healthcare-associated infections. This retrospective study assesses the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in achieving perianal swab (PAS) negativity compared to other treatments, including colistin, polymyxin B, meropenem, and combinations with fosfomycin. We retrospectively analyzed 147 CRE-colonized patients (76 females) screened with PAS samples from January 14, 2021, to April 27, 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with CAZ/AVI (n = 40) and those receiving alternative treatments (n = 44) for bloodstream infections or ventilator associated pneumonia caused by CRE. PAS negativity was defined as conversion from positive to negative, while relapse was a positive PAS result after initial negativity. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The CAZ/AVI group achieved a higher rate of PAS negativity (32 patients) with a median time to PAS negativity of 1 week. Relapse rates were similar between CAZ/AVI (23/24) and non-CAZ/AVI groups (8/10). Significant differences in PAS negativity were observed at two weeks (p < 0.001) but not at four weeks (p = 0.492). The median time to PAS negativity was shorter in the CAZ/AVI group (1 week) compared to the non-CAZ/AVI group (2 weeks; p = 0.027). CAZ/AVI is more effective than alternative treatments for short-term PAS negativity, but relapse rates are comparable, highlighting challenges in long-term CRE management. Continuous surveillance and personalized decolonization strategies are essential. Further research is needed to investigate relapse mechanisms and evaluate combination therapies or novel strategies for sustained decolonization.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.