权力中心干预对社区老年人身体功能表现的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Roland Rössler, Mathias Birrer, Aaron Haslbauer, Jay Goldfarb, Anton De Spiegeleer, Irene Härdi, Reto W Kressig
{"title":"权力中心干预对社区老年人身体功能表现的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Roland Rössler, Mathias Birrer, Aaron Haslbauer, Jay Goldfarb, Anton De Spiegeleer, Irene Härdi, Reto W Kressig","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13404-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining physical function and mobility is essential for older adults to preserve independence, reduce fall risk, and minimise dependence on care. \"Power Centering for Seniors\" (PCS) is a mindfulness-based, proprioceptive training programme combining Tai Chi and Qi Gong with functional strength and balance practices. This study assessed the efficacy of the PCS programme on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults. The study included 57 participants aged 70 years or older, randomised into an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The PCS intervention consisted of 24 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, with additional home exercises. Physical functional performance was measured using the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 (CS-PFP-10) test, focusing on the subdomain Lower Body Strength and Balance & Coordination. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the data, adjusting for baseline CS-PFP-10 scores, sex, and age. Fifty-one participants completed the study. The PCS intervention led to non-significant improvements in the CS-PFP-10 total score compared to the CG, with an adjusted difference of 2.05 points (95% CI: -0.78 to 4.89; p = 0.163; Cohen's d = 0.403). Similar trends were observed in the sub-scores for Lower Body Strength (adjusted difference: 2.84, 95% CI: -0.21 to 5.90; p = 0.074; Cohen's d = 0.517) and Balance & Coordination (adjusted difference: 3.34, 95% CI: -0.09 to 6.79; p = 0.063; Cohen's d = 0.541). The PCS intervention showed potential for improving physical function in older adults in areas critical for maintaining mobility and independence. While trends were favourable, the results did not reach statistical significance.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04861831; date of registration: April 27, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of the power centering for seniors intervention on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roland Rössler, Mathias Birrer, Aaron Haslbauer, Jay Goldfarb, Anton De Spiegeleer, Irene Härdi, Reto W Kressig\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-13404-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maintaining physical function and mobility is essential for older adults to preserve independence, reduce fall risk, and minimise dependence on care. \\\"Power Centering for Seniors\\\" (PCS) is a mindfulness-based, proprioceptive training programme combining Tai Chi and Qi Gong with functional strength and balance practices. This study assessed the efficacy of the PCS programme on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults. The study included 57 participants aged 70 years or older, randomised into an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The PCS intervention consisted of 24 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, with additional home exercises. Physical functional performance was measured using the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 (CS-PFP-10) test, focusing on the subdomain Lower Body Strength and Balance & Coordination. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the data, adjusting for baseline CS-PFP-10 scores, sex, and age. Fifty-one participants completed the study. The PCS intervention led to non-significant improvements in the CS-PFP-10 total score compared to the CG, with an adjusted difference of 2.05 points (95% CI: -0.78 to 4.89; p = 0.163; Cohen's d = 0.403). Similar trends were observed in the sub-scores for Lower Body Strength (adjusted difference: 2.84, 95% CI: -0.21 to 5.90; p = 0.074; Cohen's d = 0.517) and Balance & Coordination (adjusted difference: 3.34, 95% CI: -0.09 to 6.79; p = 0.063; Cohen's d = 0.541). The PCS intervention showed potential for improving physical function in older adults in areas critical for maintaining mobility and independence. While trends were favourable, the results did not reach statistical significance.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04861831; date of registration: April 27, 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"28908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13404-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13404-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保持身体功能和活动能力对于老年人保持独立性、减少跌倒风险和尽量减少对护理的依赖至关重要。“老年人力量集中”(PCS)是一个以正念为基础的本体感觉训练项目,将太极和气功与功能力量和平衡练习结合起来。本研究评估了PCS计划对社区老年人身体功能表现的影响。该研究包括57名年龄在70岁或以上的参与者,随机分为干预组(IG)和对照组(CG)。PCS干预包括为期12周的24次有监督的会议,以及额外的家庭练习。使用连续量表身体功能表现10 (CS-PFP-10)测试测量身体功能表现,重点关注下体力量和平衡与协调子域。采用线性混合效应模型分析数据,调整基线CS-PFP-10评分、性别和年龄。51名参与者完成了这项研究。与CG相比,PCS干预导致CS-PFP-10总分无显著改善,调整后差异为2.05分(95% CI: -0.78至4.89;p = 0.163;Cohen’s d = 0.403)。在下体力量的分值中也观察到类似的趋势(调整后差异:2.84,95% CI: -0.21至5.90;p = 0.074;科恩的d = 0.517)和平衡与协调(调整差:3.34,95% CI: -0.09至6.79;p = 0.063;Cohen’s d = 0.541)。PCS干预显示出改善老年人身体功能的潜力,这些功能对维持活动能力和独立性至关重要。虽然趋势是有利的,但结果没有达到统计意义。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04861831;注册日期:2021年4月27日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of the power centering for seniors intervention on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Efficacy of the power centering for seniors intervention on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Maintaining physical function and mobility is essential for older adults to preserve independence, reduce fall risk, and minimise dependence on care. "Power Centering for Seniors" (PCS) is a mindfulness-based, proprioceptive training programme combining Tai Chi and Qi Gong with functional strength and balance practices. This study assessed the efficacy of the PCS programme on physical functional performance in older community-dwelling adults. The study included 57 participants aged 70 years or older, randomised into an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The PCS intervention consisted of 24 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, with additional home exercises. Physical functional performance was measured using the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 (CS-PFP-10) test, focusing on the subdomain Lower Body Strength and Balance & Coordination. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyse the data, adjusting for baseline CS-PFP-10 scores, sex, and age. Fifty-one participants completed the study. The PCS intervention led to non-significant improvements in the CS-PFP-10 total score compared to the CG, with an adjusted difference of 2.05 points (95% CI: -0.78 to 4.89; p = 0.163; Cohen's d = 0.403). Similar trends were observed in the sub-scores for Lower Body Strength (adjusted difference: 2.84, 95% CI: -0.21 to 5.90; p = 0.074; Cohen's d = 0.517) and Balance & Coordination (adjusted difference: 3.34, 95% CI: -0.09 to 6.79; p = 0.063; Cohen's d = 0.541). The PCS intervention showed potential for improving physical function in older adults in areas critical for maintaining mobility and independence. While trends were favourable, the results did not reach statistical significance.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04861831; date of registration: April 27, 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信