有药物使用史的大学生生活质量的康复状况研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fares Qeadan, Naya Lipkens, Benjamin Tingey
{"title":"有药物使用史的大学生生活质量的康复状况研究。","authors":"Fares Qeadan, Naya Lipkens, Benjamin Tingey","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04041-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality of Life (QoL) is a vital measure for individuals with chronic health concerns, including those with a history of substance use. Limited research, however, focuses on QoL among college students with a history of substance use, while comparing those in recovery to those not in recovery. This study aims to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed secondary data from the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) III (Fall 2019-Fall 2022) to evaluate QoL across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Using adapted questions from the WHOQOL-BREF framework, we constructed domain-specific and overall QoL scores. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the association between recovery status and QoL, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 249,849 students, 2.2% (n = 5473) self-identified as in recovery. Students in recovery reported significantly lower QoL across all domains compared to those not in recovery, with the greatest difference in the psychological domain (mean difference: - 4.43, 95% CI [- 4.79, - 4.07]) and the smallest in the environmental domain (- 1.31, 95% CI [- 1.54, - 1.09]). Stratified analyses revealed that younger students, females, non-binary individuals, and NH Asian/Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander students exhibited the largest QoL disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>College students in recovery face notable challenges in their QoL, especially in psychological and social domains. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions, stigma reduction, and tailored support systems on college campuses to improve recovery outcomes and overall well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining quality of life by recovery status among college students with a history of substance use.\",\"authors\":\"Fares Qeadan, Naya Lipkens, Benjamin Tingey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-04041-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality of Life (QoL) is a vital measure for individuals with chronic health concerns, including those with a history of substance use. Limited research, however, focuses on QoL among college students with a history of substance use, while comparing those in recovery to those not in recovery. This study aims to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed secondary data from the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) III (Fall 2019-Fall 2022) to evaluate QoL across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Using adapted questions from the WHOQOL-BREF framework, we constructed domain-specific and overall QoL scores. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the association between recovery status and QoL, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 249,849 students, 2.2% (n = 5473) self-identified as in recovery. Students in recovery reported significantly lower QoL across all domains compared to those not in recovery, with the greatest difference in the psychological domain (mean difference: - 4.43, 95% CI [- 4.79, - 4.07]) and the smallest in the environmental domain (- 1.31, 95% CI [- 1.54, - 1.09]). Stratified analyses revealed that younger students, females, non-binary individuals, and NH Asian/Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander students exhibited the largest QoL disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>College students in recovery face notable challenges in their QoL, especially in psychological and social domains. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions, stigma reduction, and tailored support systems on college campuses to improve recovery outcomes and overall well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04041-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04041-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:生活质量(QoL)是有慢性健康问题的个人的一项重要指标,包括那些有药物使用史的人。然而,有限的研究集中在有药物使用史的大学生的生活质量上,同时比较那些正在康复和没有康复的大学生。本研究旨在解决这一差距。方法:我们分析了美国大学健康协会国家大学健康评估(aca - ncha) III(2019- 2022秋季)的二手数据,以评估身体、心理、社会和环境领域的生活质量。使用来自WHOQOL-BREF框架的适应性问题,我们构建了特定领域和总体QoL分数。采用多元线性回归评估恢复状态与生活质量之间的关系,调整人口统计学和生活方式因素。结果:249,849名学生中,有2.2% (n = 5473)自认为康复。康复的学生报告的所有领域的生活质量都明显低于未康复的学生,心理领域的差异最大(平均差异:- 4.43,95% CI[- 4.79, - 4.07]),环境领域的差异最小(- 1.31,95% CI[- 1.54, - 1.09])。分层分析显示,年轻学生、女性、非二元个体和NH亚裔/夏威夷原住民太平洋岛民学生表现出最大的生活质量差异。结论:康复期大学生的生活质量面临着显著的挑战,尤其是心理和社会方面。这些发现强调了有针对性的干预、减少耻辱感和大学校园量身定制的支持系统的必要性,以改善康复结果和整体幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining quality of life by recovery status among college students with a history of substance use.

Purpose: Quality of Life (QoL) is a vital measure for individuals with chronic health concerns, including those with a history of substance use. Limited research, however, focuses on QoL among college students with a history of substance use, while comparing those in recovery to those not in recovery. This study aims to address this gap.

Methods: We analyzed secondary data from the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) III (Fall 2019-Fall 2022) to evaluate QoL across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Using adapted questions from the WHOQOL-BREF framework, we constructed domain-specific and overall QoL scores. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the association between recovery status and QoL, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle factors.

Results: Among 249,849 students, 2.2% (n = 5473) self-identified as in recovery. Students in recovery reported significantly lower QoL across all domains compared to those not in recovery, with the greatest difference in the psychological domain (mean difference: - 4.43, 95% CI [- 4.79, - 4.07]) and the smallest in the environmental domain (- 1.31, 95% CI [- 1.54, - 1.09]). Stratified analyses revealed that younger students, females, non-binary individuals, and NH Asian/Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander students exhibited the largest QoL disparities.

Conclusions: College students in recovery face notable challenges in their QoL, especially in psychological and social domains. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions, stigma reduction, and tailored support systems on college campuses to improve recovery outcomes and overall well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信