{"title":"宗教、精神和世俗生活故事访谈:促进临床医生在培训中基于态度的宗教和精神能力。","authors":"Gina M Magyar-Russell, Paul J Deal","doi":"10.1037/pst0000593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the critical gaps in promoting religious and spiritual (R/S) competencies among clinicians in training revolves around student clinician hesitancy to engage in R/S conversations in session. This reluctance, in part, may be due to attitudinal biases based on one's own R/S experiences, which do not readily improve with knowledge and skills training. There is a need to understand how clinicians in training experience the actual process of addressing R/S content in clinical practice and academic training environments. This study describes findings based on the administration of a training tool-the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview (adapted version of the Life Story Interview; McAdams, 2007)-designed to help trainees explore the nature and dynamics of clinician resistance to engage with R/S in psychotherapy. Participants included a religiously and spiritually diverse sample of 23 student clinicians from master's and doctoral-level programs across counseling, psychology, and social work disciplines, all of whom reported moderate to high levels of hesitancy about broaching R/S in the training process (i.e., in the classroom and/or psychotherapy sessions). Three themes emerged from the evaluative findings-<i>person-centered skills, contextual factors,</i> and <i>growth through reflective storytelling</i>-that offer clues about factors supporting the process of opening and engaging with religiousness, spirituality, and secularity. The discussion will address the potential of the <i>Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview</i> as a training tool to facilitate the acquisition of attitude-based R/S competencies that may lay the foundation for cultivating skills-based competencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview: Promoting attitude-based religious and spiritual competence in clinicians in training.\",\"authors\":\"Gina M Magyar-Russell, Paul J Deal\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One of the critical gaps in promoting religious and spiritual (R/S) competencies among clinicians in training revolves around student clinician hesitancy to engage in R/S conversations in session. This reluctance, in part, may be due to attitudinal biases based on one's own R/S experiences, which do not readily improve with knowledge and skills training. There is a need to understand how clinicians in training experience the actual process of addressing R/S content in clinical practice and academic training environments. This study describes findings based on the administration of a training tool-the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview (adapted version of the Life Story Interview; McAdams, 2007)-designed to help trainees explore the nature and dynamics of clinician resistance to engage with R/S in psychotherapy. Participants included a religiously and spiritually diverse sample of 23 student clinicians from master's and doctoral-level programs across counseling, psychology, and social work disciplines, all of whom reported moderate to high levels of hesitancy about broaching R/S in the training process (i.e., in the classroom and/or psychotherapy sessions). Three themes emerged from the evaluative findings-<i>person-centered skills, contextual factors,</i> and <i>growth through reflective storytelling</i>-that offer clues about factors supporting the process of opening and engaging with religiousness, spirituality, and secularity. The discussion will address the potential of the <i>Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview</i> as a training tool to facilitate the acquisition of attitude-based R/S competencies that may lay the foundation for cultivating skills-based competencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000593\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在培训中促进临床医生的宗教和精神(R/S)能力的关键差距之一是,学生临床医生在会话中参与R/S对话时犹豫不决。在某种程度上,这种不情愿可能是由于基于个人R/S经验的态度偏见,这种偏见不容易通过知识和技能培训得到改善。有必要了解培训中的临床医生如何在临床实践和学术培训环境中体验解决R/S内容的实际过程。本研究描述了基于一种培训工具——宗教、精神和世俗生活故事访谈(改编自生活故事访谈;McAdams, 2007)-旨在帮助学员探索临床医生在心理治疗中参与R/S的本质和动态。参与者包括来自咨询、心理学和社会工作学科的硕士和博士学位课程的23名临床医生学生,他们都报告在培训过程中(即在课堂和/或心理治疗课程中)对提出R/S有中度到高度的犹豫。评估结果中出现了三个主题——以人为本的技能、背景因素和通过反思性讲故事的成长——这些主题为支持开放和参与宗教、灵性和世俗过程的因素提供了线索。讨论将讨论宗教、精神和世俗生活故事访谈作为一种培训工具的潜力,以促进获得基于态度的R/S能力,这可能为培养基于技能的能力奠定基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
The Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview: Promoting attitude-based religious and spiritual competence in clinicians in training.
One of the critical gaps in promoting religious and spiritual (R/S) competencies among clinicians in training revolves around student clinician hesitancy to engage in R/S conversations in session. This reluctance, in part, may be due to attitudinal biases based on one's own R/S experiences, which do not readily improve with knowledge and skills training. There is a need to understand how clinicians in training experience the actual process of addressing R/S content in clinical practice and academic training environments. This study describes findings based on the administration of a training tool-the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview (adapted version of the Life Story Interview; McAdams, 2007)-designed to help trainees explore the nature and dynamics of clinician resistance to engage with R/S in psychotherapy. Participants included a religiously and spiritually diverse sample of 23 student clinicians from master's and doctoral-level programs across counseling, psychology, and social work disciplines, all of whom reported moderate to high levels of hesitancy about broaching R/S in the training process (i.e., in the classroom and/or psychotherapy sessions). Three themes emerged from the evaluative findings-person-centered skills, contextual factors, and growth through reflective storytelling-that offer clues about factors supporting the process of opening and engaging with religiousness, spirituality, and secularity. The discussion will address the potential of the Religious, Spiritual, and Secular Life Story Interview as a training tool to facilitate the acquisition of attitude-based R/S competencies that may lay the foundation for cultivating skills-based competencies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.