脊髓肿胀和硬膜内压迫预测急性颈外伤性脊髓损伤后神经恢复。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325827
Harshit Arora, Hassan Darabi, Nathaniel Toop, Amy Minnema, Zahraa Al-Sharshahi, Grace M Martin, Kelsey Karnik, Jan M Schwab, Francis Farhadi
{"title":"脊髓肿胀和硬膜内压迫预测急性颈外伤性脊髓损伤后神经恢复。","authors":"Harshit Arora, Hassan Darabi, Nathaniel Toop, Amy Minnema, Zahraa Al-Sharshahi, Grace M Martin, Kelsey Karnik, Jan M Schwab, Francis Farhadi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intradural spinal cord compression impairs perfusion pressure and is putatively rate-limiting for recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). After cervical tSCI, even minimally improved tissue preservation may help promote neurological recovery. To assess the nature and extent of spinal cord swelling and compression post-acute cervical tSCI, we evaluated several baseline MRI parameters including BASIC score, intramedullary lesion (IML) length, maximal canal compromise (MCC), maximal spinal cord compression (MSCC), extent of cord compression (ECC), maximal swollen anteroposterior diameter adjacent to injury site (Dmax), and maximal cord swelling (MCS) in 169 consecutive patients across 2 centers. In patients with either primarily intradural or combined (MSCC ≤5% or >5%, respectively) cord compression, we examined the predictive value of clinical and imaging admission parameters on American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) severity and conversion up to 1-year follow-up. 37 (21.9%) patients presented with primarily intradural while 132 (78.1%) had combined cord compression. MSCC, MCS, and Dmax values differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.0001, < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). MSCC was associated with age, MCC and MCS at baseline, while MCS was associated with age, MSCC and Dmax, on multivariable analysis. Logistic regression analysis of areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) confirmed ECC (AUC 0.678) and MCS (AUC 0.922) as good and excellent predictors, respectively of AIS-conversion at 1-year for intradural compression participants. Additionally, MCS was significantly more accurate in predicting AIS-conversion in intradural group and the probability of AIS-conversion significantly decreased with each 1% increase in MCS (p = 0.003; OR 0.949), for both compression subtypes. In conclusion, baseline measures of cord swelling predict AIS-conversion likelihood up to 1-year. The deleterious effects of intradural cord compression, either isolated or presenting with extradural compression, may benefit from supplemental decompression strategies in addition to current standard-of-care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 8","pages":"e0325827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Harshit Arora, Hassan Darabi, Nathaniel Toop, Amy Minnema, Zahraa Al-Sharshahi, Grace M Martin, Kelsey Karnik, Jan M Schwab, Francis Farhadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intradural spinal cord compression impairs perfusion pressure and is putatively rate-limiting for recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). After cervical tSCI, even minimally improved tissue preservation may help promote neurological recovery. To assess the nature and extent of spinal cord swelling and compression post-acute cervical tSCI, we evaluated several baseline MRI parameters including BASIC score, intramedullary lesion (IML) length, maximal canal compromise (MCC), maximal spinal cord compression (MSCC), extent of cord compression (ECC), maximal swollen anteroposterior diameter adjacent to injury site (Dmax), and maximal cord swelling (MCS) in 169 consecutive patients across 2 centers. In patients with either primarily intradural or combined (MSCC ≤5% or >5%, respectively) cord compression, we examined the predictive value of clinical and imaging admission parameters on American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) severity and conversion up to 1-year follow-up. 37 (21.9%) patients presented with primarily intradural while 132 (78.1%) had combined cord compression. MSCC, MCS, and Dmax values differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.0001, < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). MSCC was associated with age, MCC and MCS at baseline, while MCS was associated with age, MSCC and Dmax, on multivariable analysis. Logistic regression analysis of areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) confirmed ECC (AUC 0.678) and MCS (AUC 0.922) as good and excellent predictors, respectively of AIS-conversion at 1-year for intradural compression participants. Additionally, MCS was significantly more accurate in predicting AIS-conversion in intradural group and the probability of AIS-conversion significantly decreased with each 1% increase in MCS (p = 0.003; OR 0.949), for both compression subtypes. In conclusion, baseline measures of cord swelling predict AIS-conversion likelihood up to 1-year. The deleterious effects of intradural cord compression, either isolated or presenting with extradural compression, may benefit from supplemental decompression strategies in addition to current standard-of-care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"e0325827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325827\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬膜内脊髓压迫损害灌注压,并被认为限制了创伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)后的恢复速度。颈椎tSCI后,即使是最低限度的改善组织保存也可能有助于促进神经功能的恢复。为了评估急性颈椎tSCI后脊髓肿胀和压迫的性质和程度,我们评估了几个基线MRI参数,包括BASIC评分、髓内病变(IML)长度、最大椎管妥协(MCC)、最大脊髓压迫(MSCC)、脊髓压迫程度(ECC)、靠近损伤部位的最大前后径肿胀(Dmax)和最大脊髓肿胀(MCS)。在主要硬膜内或合并(MSCC≤5%或>5%)脊髓压迫的患者中,我们检查了美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)严重程度和转换的临床和影像学入院参数的预测价值,随访时间长达1年。37例(21.9%)患者主要表现为硬膜内压迫,132例(78.1%)合并脊髓压迫。两组间MSCC、MCS和Dmax值差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord swelling and intradural compression predict neurological recovery after acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.

Intradural spinal cord compression impairs perfusion pressure and is putatively rate-limiting for recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). After cervical tSCI, even minimally improved tissue preservation may help promote neurological recovery. To assess the nature and extent of spinal cord swelling and compression post-acute cervical tSCI, we evaluated several baseline MRI parameters including BASIC score, intramedullary lesion (IML) length, maximal canal compromise (MCC), maximal spinal cord compression (MSCC), extent of cord compression (ECC), maximal swollen anteroposterior diameter adjacent to injury site (Dmax), and maximal cord swelling (MCS) in 169 consecutive patients across 2 centers. In patients with either primarily intradural or combined (MSCC ≤5% or >5%, respectively) cord compression, we examined the predictive value of clinical and imaging admission parameters on American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) severity and conversion up to 1-year follow-up. 37 (21.9%) patients presented with primarily intradural while 132 (78.1%) had combined cord compression. MSCC, MCS, and Dmax values differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.0001, < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). MSCC was associated with age, MCC and MCS at baseline, while MCS was associated with age, MSCC and Dmax, on multivariable analysis. Logistic regression analysis of areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) confirmed ECC (AUC 0.678) and MCS (AUC 0.922) as good and excellent predictors, respectively of AIS-conversion at 1-year for intradural compression participants. Additionally, MCS was significantly more accurate in predicting AIS-conversion in intradural group and the probability of AIS-conversion significantly decreased with each 1% increase in MCS (p = 0.003; OR 0.949), for both compression subtypes. In conclusion, baseline measures of cord swelling predict AIS-conversion likelihood up to 1-year. The deleterious effects of intradural cord compression, either isolated or presenting with extradural compression, may benefit from supplemental decompression strategies in addition to current standard-of-care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信