在高传播地区改进疟疾诊断:采用快速诊断测试和dbPCR-NALFIA的双重方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Diane Yirgnur Some, Francois Kiemde, Hermann Sorgho, Marc Christian Tahita, Antonia Windkouni Bere, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Souleymane Vivien Banao, Kouadjo Bagre, Gérémie Djiri, Georges Some, Toussaint Rouamba, Yeri Esther Hien, Aly Savadogo, Henk D F H Schallig, Halidou Tinto
{"title":"在高传播地区改进疟疾诊断:采用快速诊断测试和dbPCR-NALFIA的双重方法。","authors":"Diane Yirgnur Some, Francois Kiemde, Hermann Sorgho, Marc Christian Tahita, Antonia Windkouni Bere, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Souleymane Vivien Banao, Kouadjo Bagre, Gérémie Djiri, Georges Some, Toussaint Rouamba, Yeri Esther Hien, Aly Savadogo, Henk D F H Schallig, Halidou Tinto","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05500-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are an essential tool in managing febrile illnesses in endemic settings. However, persisting parasite antigen after treatment or spontaneous remission, which can be detected by histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based RDT or Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDTs, could lead to misdiagnosis. To overcome the latter, a diagnostic approach combining sequential interpretation of two-step malaria RDTs incorporating two parasite antigens detecting PfHRP2 and pLDH coupled with a direct-on-blood mini PCR-nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (dbPCR-NALFIA) has been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Febrile patients visiting two rural health facilities in Burkina Faso were enrolled. For each participant, an HRP2-based RDT and blood slides for microscopy (gold standard) were performed. A capillary blood sample was also collected in an EDTA tube and transported to laboratory to perform the two-step malaria RDT detecting HRP2 and LDH, and dbPCR-NALFIA testing. Malaria diagnostic results were sequentially interpreted and reported as: (i) positive when pLDH line appears regardless of the HRP2 results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH +); (ii) negative when both lines are absent (PfHRP2-/pLDH-); and (iii) undetermined when only the HRP2 line appears (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-). Undetermined cases were subsequently confirmed by dbPCR-NALFIA test and reported as positive or negative. Malaria microscopy was used as reference test of conclusive diagnostic results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + , PfHRP2-/pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH-) and qPCR for undetermined cases (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 438 blood samples analysed, 87.2% (382/438) of patients with conclusive sequential interpretation of HRP2 and pLDH did not need confirmative testing with dbPCR-NALFIA. The sensitivity and specificity of these conclusive results were 98.8% and 95.3%, respectively. Following confirmation of undetermined sequential interpretation with dbPCR-NALFIA, the sequential algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 94.8%, a positive predictive value of 97.2%, and a negative predictive value of 96.1%. For single HRP2-based RDT, the sensitivity was 95.2%, the specificity 73.2%, the positive predictive value 85.1%, and the negative predictive value 90.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sequential algorithm of the two-step RDTs combined with dbPCR-NALFIA on inconclusive results enhances the diagnosis of malaria in febrile patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining malaria diagnosis in high-transmission areas: a dual-approach with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and dbPCR-NALFIA.\",\"authors\":\"Diane Yirgnur Some, Francois Kiemde, Hermann Sorgho, Marc Christian Tahita, Antonia Windkouni Bere, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Souleymane Vivien Banao, Kouadjo Bagre, Gérémie Djiri, Georges Some, Toussaint Rouamba, Yeri Esther Hien, Aly Savadogo, Henk D F H Schallig, Halidou Tinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12936-025-05500-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are an essential tool in managing febrile illnesses in endemic settings. However, persisting parasite antigen after treatment or spontaneous remission, which can be detected by histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based RDT or Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDTs, could lead to misdiagnosis. To overcome the latter, a diagnostic approach combining sequential interpretation of two-step malaria RDTs incorporating two parasite antigens detecting PfHRP2 and pLDH coupled with a direct-on-blood mini PCR-nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (dbPCR-NALFIA) has been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Febrile patients visiting two rural health facilities in Burkina Faso were enrolled. For each participant, an HRP2-based RDT and blood slides for microscopy (gold standard) were performed. A capillary blood sample was also collected in an EDTA tube and transported to laboratory to perform the two-step malaria RDT detecting HRP2 and LDH, and dbPCR-NALFIA testing. Malaria diagnostic results were sequentially interpreted and reported as: (i) positive when pLDH line appears regardless of the HRP2 results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH +); (ii) negative when both lines are absent (PfHRP2-/pLDH-); and (iii) undetermined when only the HRP2 line appears (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-). Undetermined cases were subsequently confirmed by dbPCR-NALFIA test and reported as positive or negative. Malaria microscopy was used as reference test of conclusive diagnostic results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + , PfHRP2-/pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH-) and qPCR for undetermined cases (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 438 blood samples analysed, 87.2% (382/438) of patients with conclusive sequential interpretation of HRP2 and pLDH did not need confirmative testing with dbPCR-NALFIA. The sensitivity and specificity of these conclusive results were 98.8% and 95.3%, respectively. Following confirmation of undetermined sequential interpretation with dbPCR-NALFIA, the sequential algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 94.8%, a positive predictive value of 97.2%, and a negative predictive value of 96.1%. For single HRP2-based RDT, the sensitivity was 95.2%, the specificity 73.2%, the positive predictive value 85.1%, and the negative predictive value 90.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sequential algorithm of the two-step RDTs combined with dbPCR-NALFIA on inconclusive results enhances the diagnosis of malaria in febrile patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05500-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05500-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疟疾快速诊断测试(RDTs)是在流行环境中管理发热性疾病的重要工具。然而,通过基于组氨酸富蛋白2 (HRP2)的RDT或基于乳酸疟原虫脱氢酶(pLDH)的RDT检测,治疗后持续存在的寄生虫抗原或自发缓解可能导致误诊。为了克服后者,研究人员评估了一种结合两步疟疾rdt序列解释的诊断方法,该方法包含检测PfHRP2和pLDH的两种寄生虫抗原,并结合直接对血的迷你pcr -核酸侧流免疫分析法(dbPCR-NALFIA)。方法:对在布基纳法索两家农村卫生机构就诊的发热患者进行研究。对每个参与者进行基于hrp2的RDT和用于显微镜的血液玻片(金标准)。在EDTA管中采集毛细血管血样并运至实验室进行两步疟疾RDT检测HRP2和LDH以及dbPCR-NALFIA检测。疟疾诊断结果依次解释并报告为:(i)无论HRP2结果如何(PfHRP2 + /pLDH +或PfHRP2-/pLDH +),当pLDH线出现时均为阳性;(ii)当两条线都缺失时呈阴性(PfHRP2-/pLDH-);(iii)不确定何时只出现HRP2系(PfHRP2 + /pLDH-)。未确定的病例随后通过dbPCR-NALFIA检测确诊,并报告为阳性或阴性。疟疾显微镜作为结论性诊断结果(PfHRP2 + /pLDH +、PfHRP2-/pLDH +或PfHRP2-/pLDH-)的参考检测,qPCR用于未确定病例(PfHRP2 + /pLDH-)的参考检测。结果:在分析的438份血液样本中,87.2%(382/438)的HRP2和pLDH结结性序列解释的患者不需要用dbPCR-NALFIA进行确认检测。结论性结果的敏感性为98.8%,特异性为95.3%。通过dbPCR-NALFIA对未确定序列解释进行确认,序列算法的敏感性为97.9%,特异性为94.8%,阳性预测值为97.2%,阴性预测值为96.1%。单次hrp2 RDT的敏感性为95.2%,特异性为73.2%,阳性预测值为85.1%,阴性预测值为90.4%。结论:两步rdt序列算法结合dbPCR-NALFIA对不确定结果的诊断提高了对发热患者疟疾的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Refining malaria diagnosis in high-transmission areas: a dual-approach with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and dbPCR-NALFIA.

Refining malaria diagnosis in high-transmission areas: a dual-approach with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and dbPCR-NALFIA.

Background: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are an essential tool in managing febrile illnesses in endemic settings. However, persisting parasite antigen after treatment or spontaneous remission, which can be detected by histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)-based RDT or Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH)-based RDTs, could lead to misdiagnosis. To overcome the latter, a diagnostic approach combining sequential interpretation of two-step malaria RDTs incorporating two parasite antigens detecting PfHRP2 and pLDH coupled with a direct-on-blood mini PCR-nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (dbPCR-NALFIA) has been evaluated.

Methods: Febrile patients visiting two rural health facilities in Burkina Faso were enrolled. For each participant, an HRP2-based RDT and blood slides for microscopy (gold standard) were performed. A capillary blood sample was also collected in an EDTA tube and transported to laboratory to perform the two-step malaria RDT detecting HRP2 and LDH, and dbPCR-NALFIA testing. Malaria diagnostic results were sequentially interpreted and reported as: (i) positive when pLDH line appears regardless of the HRP2 results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH +); (ii) negative when both lines are absent (PfHRP2-/pLDH-); and (iii) undetermined when only the HRP2 line appears (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-). Undetermined cases were subsequently confirmed by dbPCR-NALFIA test and reported as positive or negative. Malaria microscopy was used as reference test of conclusive diagnostic results (PfHRP2 + /pLDH + , PfHRP2-/pLDH + or PfHRP2-/pLDH-) and qPCR for undetermined cases (PfHRP2 + /pLDH-).

Results: Out of 438 blood samples analysed, 87.2% (382/438) of patients with conclusive sequential interpretation of HRP2 and pLDH did not need confirmative testing with dbPCR-NALFIA. The sensitivity and specificity of these conclusive results were 98.8% and 95.3%, respectively. Following confirmation of undetermined sequential interpretation with dbPCR-NALFIA, the sequential algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 94.8%, a positive predictive value of 97.2%, and a negative predictive value of 96.1%. For single HRP2-based RDT, the sensitivity was 95.2%, the specificity 73.2%, the positive predictive value 85.1%, and the negative predictive value 90.4%.

Conclusions: The sequential algorithm of the two-step RDTs combined with dbPCR-NALFIA on inconclusive results enhances the diagnosis of malaria in febrile patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信