中国高度近视不同眼轴长度患者前房生物特征参数与沟沟直径的相关性和一致性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yuyan Huang, Huiling Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Hehe Huang, Zhina Zhi, Si Chen
{"title":"中国高度近视不同眼轴长度患者前房生物特征参数与沟沟直径的相关性和一致性。","authors":"Yuyan Huang, Huiling Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Hehe Huang, Zhina Zhi, Si Chen","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250612-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between anterior chamber biometric parameters (angle-to-angle diameter [ATA] and anterior chamber width [ACW]) and the sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) in myopic patients with varying axial length (AL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 50-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) device measured STS at the 0° and 90° meridians in the right eyes of 77 Chinese patients with high myopia and an anterior chamber depth greater than 2.80 mm. Swept-source optical coherence tomography device (CASIA2; Tomey) measured ATA and ACW at the 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° meridians, whereas corneal topography measured the horizontal white-to-white diameter (WTW-0°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vertical STS, ATA, and ACW measurements were significantly longer than their horizontal counterparts (<i>P</i> < .001). Differences in STS and ACW between vertical and horizontal meridians were comparable (<i>P</i> = .503), whereas ATA differences was more pronounced than that of STS (<i>P</i> = .032). Both STS-0° and STS-90° were significantly greater than WTW-0°, ATA, and ACW at their respective meridians (<i>P</i> ⩽ .016), except for STS-0° versus ACW-0° (<i>P</i> = .127). Correlations between STS-0°/STS-90° and WTW-0° were weaker than those with ACW or ATA. STS-0° exhibited the strongest correlation with ACW-0°, whereas STS-90° correlated best with ACW-45°. For patients with AL shorter than 28.5 mm, no significant differences existed between STS-0° and WTW-0°/ATA-0°/ACW-0°. In contrast, for those with AL greater than 28.5 mm, only ACW-0° was comparable to STS-0°. At the vertical meridian, only ACW had no significant differences compared to STS for patients with different ranges of AL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Chinese patients who are potential candidates for Implantable Collamer Lens implantation, ACW shows better concordance with STS than ATA and WTW-0°. The reliability of WTW-0° for estimating STS decreases with increased AL, making ACW more suitable for STS estimation in patients with AL greater than 28.5 mm, especially at non-horizontal meridians.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"e805-e813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation and Agreement of Anterior Chamber Biometric Parameters and Sulcusto-Sulcus Diameter in Chinese Patients With High Myopia and Varying Axial Lengths.\",\"authors\":\"Yuyan Huang, Huiling Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Hehe Huang, Zhina Zhi, Si Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250612-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between anterior chamber biometric parameters (angle-to-angle diameter [ATA] and anterior chamber width [ACW]) and the sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) in myopic patients with varying axial length (AL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 50-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) device measured STS at the 0° and 90° meridians in the right eyes of 77 Chinese patients with high myopia and an anterior chamber depth greater than 2.80 mm. Swept-source optical coherence tomography device (CASIA2; Tomey) measured ATA and ACW at the 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° meridians, whereas corneal topography measured the horizontal white-to-white diameter (WTW-0°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vertical STS, ATA, and ACW measurements were significantly longer than their horizontal counterparts (<i>P</i> < .001). Differences in STS and ACW between vertical and horizontal meridians were comparable (<i>P</i> = .503), whereas ATA differences was more pronounced than that of STS (<i>P</i> = .032). Both STS-0° and STS-90° were significantly greater than WTW-0°, ATA, and ACW at their respective meridians (<i>P</i> ⩽ .016), except for STS-0° versus ACW-0° (<i>P</i> = .127). Correlations between STS-0°/STS-90° and WTW-0° were weaker than those with ACW or ATA. STS-0° exhibited the strongest correlation with ACW-0°, whereas STS-90° correlated best with ACW-45°. For patients with AL shorter than 28.5 mm, no significant differences existed between STS-0° and WTW-0°/ATA-0°/ACW-0°. In contrast, for those with AL greater than 28.5 mm, only ACW-0° was comparable to STS-0°. At the vertical meridian, only ACW had no significant differences compared to STS for patients with different ranges of AL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Chinese patients who are potential candidates for Implantable Collamer Lens implantation, ACW shows better concordance with STS than ATA and WTW-0°. The reliability of WTW-0° for estimating STS decreases with increased AL, making ACW more suitable for STS estimation in patients with AL greater than 28.5 mm, especially at non-horizontal meridians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 8\",\"pages\":\"e805-e813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250612-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250612-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价不同轴长(AL)近视患者前房生物特征参数(角对角直径[ATA]和前房宽度[ACW])与沟对沟直径(STS)的关系。方法:采用50 mhz超声生物显微镜(UBM)测量77例中国高度近视患者右眼0°和90°经络处前房深度大于2.80 mm的STS。扫描源光学相干层析成像装置(CASIA2);Tomey)测量了0°、45°、90°和135°经线处的ATA和ACW,而角膜地形图测量了水平白到白直径(WTW-0°)。结果:垂直STS、ATA和ACW测量值明显长于水平测量值(P < 0.001)。垂直和水平经络的STS和ACW差异具有可比性(P = .503),而ATA差异比STS更明显(P = .032)。STS-0°和STS-90°在各自经脉上均显著高于WTW-0°、ATA和ACW (P < 0.016),但STS-0°与ACW-0°的差异(P < 0.127)。STS-0°/STS-90°与WTW-0°的相关性较ACW或ATA弱。STS-0°与ACW-0°的相关性最强,而STS-90°与ACW-45°的相关性最好。对于短于28.5 mm的AL患者,STS-0°与WTW-0°/ATA-0°/ACW-0°之间无显著差异。而对于AL大于28.5 mm的患者,只有ACW-0°与STS-0°具有可比性。结论:在中国有可能进行植入式Collamer Lens植入术的患者中,ACW与STS的一致性优于ATA和WTW-0°。WTW-0°估计STS的可靠性随着AL的增加而降低,使得ACW更适合于AL大于28.5 mm的患者的STS估计,特别是在非水平经脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation and Agreement of Anterior Chamber Biometric Parameters and Sulcusto-Sulcus Diameter in Chinese Patients With High Myopia and Varying Axial Lengths.

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between anterior chamber biometric parameters (angle-to-angle diameter [ATA] and anterior chamber width [ACW]) and the sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) in myopic patients with varying axial length (AL).

Methods: A 50-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) device measured STS at the 0° and 90° meridians in the right eyes of 77 Chinese patients with high myopia and an anterior chamber depth greater than 2.80 mm. Swept-source optical coherence tomography device (CASIA2; Tomey) measured ATA and ACW at the 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° meridians, whereas corneal topography measured the horizontal white-to-white diameter (WTW-0°).

Results: Vertical STS, ATA, and ACW measurements were significantly longer than their horizontal counterparts (P < .001). Differences in STS and ACW between vertical and horizontal meridians were comparable (P = .503), whereas ATA differences was more pronounced than that of STS (P = .032). Both STS-0° and STS-90° were significantly greater than WTW-0°, ATA, and ACW at their respective meridians (P ⩽ .016), except for STS-0° versus ACW-0° (P = .127). Correlations between STS-0°/STS-90° and WTW-0° were weaker than those with ACW or ATA. STS-0° exhibited the strongest correlation with ACW-0°, whereas STS-90° correlated best with ACW-45°. For patients with AL shorter than 28.5 mm, no significant differences existed between STS-0° and WTW-0°/ATA-0°/ACW-0°. In contrast, for those with AL greater than 28.5 mm, only ACW-0° was comparable to STS-0°. At the vertical meridian, only ACW had no significant differences compared to STS for patients with different ranges of AL.

Conclusions: In Chinese patients who are potential candidates for Implantable Collamer Lens implantation, ACW shows better concordance with STS than ATA and WTW-0°. The reliability of WTW-0° for estimating STS decreases with increased AL, making ACW more suitable for STS estimation in patients with AL greater than 28.5 mm, especially at non-horizontal meridians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信