一项使用急性生理和慢性健康评估- ii和序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测预后的前瞻性观察研究

Q3 Medicine
Niraj Kumar Keyal, Sudhakar Jha, Shahnaj Parween, Ishfa Banu Haque, Tauqueer Ansari, Istiyaque Ansari
{"title":"一项使用急性生理和慢性健康评估- ii和序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测预后的前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Niraj Kumar Keyal, Sudhakar Jha, Shahnaj Parween, Ishfa Banu Haque, Tauqueer Ansari, Istiyaque Ansari","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation -II (APACHE-II) and Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) is used to predict overall mortality and sepsis outcome in the intensive care unit (ICU) respectively. There are limited studies that have shown that both score can be used to predict mortality in surgical and medical patients admitted in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a prospective, observational study in a level three intensive care unit of National Medical College, Birgunj. This study was conducted in 542 patients admitted in the mixed intensive care unit of medical; college. Demographic data was gathered from each patient in the preformed sheet at the time of presentation to the intensive care unit. Outcome of patients was recorded in terms of mortality, discharge toward and leave against medical advice. The descriptive data are presented as the number and percentage for categorical data and mean ± standard deviation for continuous data according to their distribution Results: Five hundred forty two patients were included in this study. 340(62.7%) were males and 202(37.3%) were females. 440(81%) patients survived and went home, 65(12%) expired, 26(5%) left the hospital against medical advice (LAMA) and 11(2%) gave do not resuscitate orders (DNR). The discrimination power was similar for APACHE II and SOFA scores (AUC=0.732 versus 0.771, respectively, p>0.05). APACHE II score>8.5 and SOFA >3.5 was cut off to predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SOFA and APACHE II has similar discriminating power to predict mortality in all group of patients in a mixed intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"23 1","pages":"152-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Observational Study on Use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Niraj Kumar Keyal, Sudhakar Jha, Shahnaj Parween, Ishfa Banu Haque, Tauqueer Ansari, Istiyaque Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation -II (APACHE-II) and Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) is used to predict overall mortality and sepsis outcome in the intensive care unit (ICU) respectively. There are limited studies that have shown that both score can be used to predict mortality in surgical and medical patients admitted in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a prospective, observational study in a level three intensive care unit of National Medical College, Birgunj. This study was conducted in 542 patients admitted in the mixed intensive care unit of medical; college. Demographic data was gathered from each patient in the preformed sheet at the time of presentation to the intensive care unit. Outcome of patients was recorded in terms of mortality, discharge toward and leave against medical advice. The descriptive data are presented as the number and percentage for categorical data and mean ± standard deviation for continuous data according to their distribution Results: Five hundred forty two patients were included in this study. 340(62.7%) were males and 202(37.3%) were females. 440(81%) patients survived and went home, 65(12%) expired, 26(5%) left the hospital against medical advice (LAMA) and 11(2%) gave do not resuscitate orders (DNR). The discrimination power was similar for APACHE II and SOFA scores (AUC=0.732 versus 0.771, respectively, p>0.05). APACHE II score>8.5 and SOFA >3.5 was cut off to predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SOFA and APACHE II has similar discriminating power to predict mortality in all group of patients in a mixed intensive care unit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"152-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性生理和慢性健康评估-II (APACHE-II)和顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)分别用于预测重症监护病房(ICU)的总死亡率和脓毒症结局。有限的研究表明,这两种评分都可以用来预测重症监护病房外科和内科患者的死亡率。方法:采用前瞻性、观察性研究,在哈尔滨国立医学院三级重症监护病房进行。本研究纳入542例住院的内科混合重症监护病房患者;大学。在向重症监护病房介绍时,从预制表中收集每位患者的人口统计数据。记录患者的死亡率、出院情况和遵医嘱出院情况。描述性资料以分类资料的数量和百分比表示,连续资料以平均±标准差表示。结果:本研究共纳入542例患者。男性340例(62.7%),女性202例(37.3%)。440例(81%)患者存活并回家,65例(12%)患者死亡,26例(5%)患者不遵医嘱出院(LAMA), 11例(2%)患者给予不复苏命令(DNR)。APACHE II和SOFA评分的区分力相似(AUC分别为0.732和0.771,p < 0.05)。APACHEⅱ评分bbbb8.5分,SOFA评分bbbb3.5分,以预测死亡率。结论:SOFA和APACHE II在预测混合重症监护病房所有组患者的死亡率方面具有相似的判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Observational Study on Use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Outcome.

Background: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation -II (APACHE-II) and Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) is used to predict overall mortality and sepsis outcome in the intensive care unit (ICU) respectively. There are limited studies that have shown that both score can be used to predict mortality in surgical and medical patients admitted in the intensive care unit.

Methods: It was a prospective, observational study in a level three intensive care unit of National Medical College, Birgunj. This study was conducted in 542 patients admitted in the mixed intensive care unit of medical; college. Demographic data was gathered from each patient in the preformed sheet at the time of presentation to the intensive care unit. Outcome of patients was recorded in terms of mortality, discharge toward and leave against medical advice. The descriptive data are presented as the number and percentage for categorical data and mean ± standard deviation for continuous data according to their distribution Results: Five hundred forty two patients were included in this study. 340(62.7%) were males and 202(37.3%) were females. 440(81%) patients survived and went home, 65(12%) expired, 26(5%) left the hospital against medical advice (LAMA) and 11(2%) gave do not resuscitate orders (DNR). The discrimination power was similar for APACHE II and SOFA scores (AUC=0.732 versus 0.771, respectively, p>0.05). APACHE II score>8.5 and SOFA >3.5 was cut off to predict mortality.

Conclusions: SOFA and APACHE II has similar discriminating power to predict mortality in all group of patients in a mixed intensive care unit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信