确定障碍和重点领域,以改善尼泊尔儿科医生的出版实践。

Q3 Medicine
Ajaya Kumar Dhakal, Arun Kumar Neopane, Moon Thapa, Neeti Singh, Devendra Shrestha
{"title":"确定障碍和重点领域,以改善尼泊尔儿科医生的出版实践。","authors":"Ajaya Kumar Dhakal, Arun Kumar Neopane, Moon Thapa, Neeti Singh, Devendra Shrestha","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical research publications in Nepal have remained relatively uncommon over the last decade. However, recent growing research interest among clinicians in Nepal has emphasised the need to identify and address key barriers to strengthen the research-publication process. This study aimed to identify these barriers and focus areas for improving publication practices among paediatricians in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Nepali paediatricians from 15 January to 15 May 2024 using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The survey included Likert-scale, open-ended, and closed-ended questions on research-publication barriers, research practices, motivation, and recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 participants (male: 60.1%) responded to the survey. Of these, 35.2% worked in government hospitals, 38.6% were subspecialists, and 54.9% had additional responsibilities beyond their paediatric work. Furthermore, 77.5% of paediatricians had publications, with 78% and 95.15% as principal authors and co-authors, respectively. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were deemed to be the most challenging, whereas cross-sectional studies were the easiest to conduct. Academic recognition (73.7%) was the primary motivation for publishing, whereas the most significant barrier was being overwhelmed by clinical work (64.5%). Time management (96.1%) and clinical work responsibilities (93.2%) were the main challenges in the manuscript preparation. Ghost authorship (14%) and gift authorship (32.6%) were the most common issues related to authorship. Most participants (80.5%) believed that training in manuscript writing and research methodology could improve the quality and quantity of the research publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paediatricians in Nepal face several publication barriers, which can be addressed through increased funding, improved resources, and enhanced research training.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"23 1","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Barriers and Areas of Focus to Improve the Publication Practices among Paediatricians in Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Ajaya Kumar Dhakal, Arun Kumar Neopane, Moon Thapa, Neeti Singh, Devendra Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical research publications in Nepal have remained relatively uncommon over the last decade. However, recent growing research interest among clinicians in Nepal has emphasised the need to identify and address key barriers to strengthen the research-publication process. This study aimed to identify these barriers and focus areas for improving publication practices among paediatricians in Nepal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Nepali paediatricians from 15 January to 15 May 2024 using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The survey included Likert-scale, open-ended, and closed-ended questions on research-publication barriers, research practices, motivation, and recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 293 participants (male: 60.1%) responded to the survey. Of these, 35.2% worked in government hospitals, 38.6% were subspecialists, and 54.9% had additional responsibilities beyond their paediatric work. Furthermore, 77.5% of paediatricians had publications, with 78% and 95.15% as principal authors and co-authors, respectively. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were deemed to be the most challenging, whereas cross-sectional studies were the easiest to conduct. Academic recognition (73.7%) was the primary motivation for publishing, whereas the most significant barrier was being overwhelmed by clinical work (64.5%). Time management (96.1%) and clinical work responsibilities (93.2%) were the main challenges in the manuscript preparation. Ghost authorship (14%) and gift authorship (32.6%) were the most common issues related to authorship. Most participants (80.5%) believed that training in manuscript writing and research methodology could improve the quality and quantity of the research publications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paediatricians in Nepal face several publication barriers, which can be addressed through increased funding, improved resources, and enhanced research training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"190-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去十年中,尼泊尔的医学研究出版物相对较少。然而,尼泊尔临床医生最近日益增长的研究兴趣强调了确定和解决加强研究出版过程的关键障碍的必要性。这项研究旨在确定这些障碍和重点领域,以改善尼泊尔儿科医生的出版实践。方法:从2024年1月15日至5月15日,通过谷歌表格分发半结构化问卷,对尼泊尔儿科医生进行横断面研究。调查包括李克特量表、开放式和封闭式问题,涉及研究发表障碍、研究实践、动机和改进建议。结果:共有293名参与者(男性占60.1%)参与调查。其中,35.2%在政府医院工作,38.6%是专科医生,54.9%在儿科工作之外还有其他职责。此外,77.5%的儿科医生发表过论文,其中78%为主要作者,95.15%为共同作者。系统评价和荟萃分析被认为是最具挑战性的,而横断面研究是最容易进行的。学术认可(73.7%)是发表论文的主要动机,而最重要的障碍是临床工作(64.5%)。时间管理(96.1%)和临床工作责任(93.2%)是论文准备的主要挑战。代作者(14%)和赠与作者(32.6%)是与作者身份相关的最常见问题。大多数参与者(80.5%)认为对论文写作和研究方法的培训可以提高研究出版物的质量和数量。结论:尼泊尔的儿科医生面临着一些发表障碍,这些障碍可以通过增加资金、改善资源和加强研究培训来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Barriers and Areas of Focus to Improve the Publication Practices among Paediatricians in Nepal.

Background: Medical research publications in Nepal have remained relatively uncommon over the last decade. However, recent growing research interest among clinicians in Nepal has emphasised the need to identify and address key barriers to strengthen the research-publication process. This study aimed to identify these barriers and focus areas for improving publication practices among paediatricians in Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Nepali paediatricians from 15 January to 15 May 2024 using a semi-structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The survey included Likert-scale, open-ended, and closed-ended questions on research-publication barriers, research practices, motivation, and recommendations for improvement.

Results: A total of 293 participants (male: 60.1%) responded to the survey. Of these, 35.2% worked in government hospitals, 38.6% were subspecialists, and 54.9% had additional responsibilities beyond their paediatric work. Furthermore, 77.5% of paediatricians had publications, with 78% and 95.15% as principal authors and co-authors, respectively. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were deemed to be the most challenging, whereas cross-sectional studies were the easiest to conduct. Academic recognition (73.7%) was the primary motivation for publishing, whereas the most significant barrier was being overwhelmed by clinical work (64.5%). Time management (96.1%) and clinical work responsibilities (93.2%) were the main challenges in the manuscript preparation. Ghost authorship (14%) and gift authorship (32.6%) were the most common issues related to authorship. Most participants (80.5%) believed that training in manuscript writing and research methodology could improve the quality and quantity of the research publications.

Conclusions: Paediatricians in Nepal face several publication barriers, which can be addressed through increased funding, improved resources, and enhanced research training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信