高压布比卡因加芬太尼与不加芬太尼对减轻脊柱麻醉剖宫产时内脏疼痛的比较。

Q3 Medicine
Rashmi Thapa, Pooja Paudyal, Bishwas Pradhan, Megha Koirala, Bashu Dev Parajuli
{"title":"高压布比卡因加芬太尼与不加芬太尼对减轻脊柱麻醉剖宫产时内脏疼痛的比较。","authors":"Rashmi Thapa, Pooja Paudyal, Bishwas Pradhan, Megha Koirala, Bashu Dev Parajuli","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Visceral pain occurred during cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia can be decreased with a higher dose of bupivacaine. However, larger doses of bupivacaine increases the risk of high sensory block. We hypothesized that addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine intrathecally could intensifies the sensory block and improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia. The aim of this study is to compare incidence of visceral pain between hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 72 term parturient with ASA PS II undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly distributed into two groups. Group B received 2.2ml (11mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine while Group BF received 2 ml (10mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2ml (10µg) of fentanyl intrathecally. Incidence of intraoperative visceral pain, maternal hemodynamics, side effects and APGAR score were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During exteriorization of uterus, 11% of parturient in Group BF and 44% parturient in Group B complained of intraoperative visceral pain with significant difference between two group (p=0.002). The intraoperative rescue analgesia was given in 22 % parturient in Group BF and 33% parturient in Group B (p= 0.29). Maternal vital parameters like blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were comparable between two groups. APGAR score was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine was effective in reducing intraoperative visceral pain during cesarean delivery with stable maternal hemodynamics and without neonatal side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":"23 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with and Without Fentanyl in Reducing Visceral Pain During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anaesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Thapa, Pooja Paudyal, Bishwas Pradhan, Megha Koirala, Bashu Dev Parajuli\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Visceral pain occurred during cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia can be decreased with a higher dose of bupivacaine. However, larger doses of bupivacaine increases the risk of high sensory block. We hypothesized that addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine intrathecally could intensifies the sensory block and improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia. The aim of this study is to compare incidence of visceral pain between hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 72 term parturient with ASA PS II undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly distributed into two groups. Group B received 2.2ml (11mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine while Group BF received 2 ml (10mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2ml (10µg) of fentanyl intrathecally. Incidence of intraoperative visceral pain, maternal hemodynamics, side effects and APGAR score were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During exteriorization of uterus, 11% of parturient in Group BF and 44% parturient in Group B complained of intraoperative visceral pain with significant difference between two group (p=0.002). The intraoperative rescue analgesia was given in 22 % parturient in Group BF and 33% parturient in Group B (p= 0.29). Maternal vital parameters like blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were comparable between two groups. APGAR score was similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine was effective in reducing intraoperative visceral pain during cesarean delivery with stable maternal hemodynamics and without neonatal side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"25-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高剂量布比卡因可减少腰麻剖宫产时内脏疼痛。然而,大剂量的布比卡因会增加高度感觉阻滞的风险。我们假设在布比卡因鞘内加入芬太尼可以增强感觉阻滞,提高术中镇痛质量。本研究的目的是比较脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时使用高压布比卡因加芬太尼或不加芬太尼时内脏疼痛的发生率。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照试验,将72例ASA PS II型足月产妇在脊髓麻醉下剖宫产,随机分为两组。B组给予0.5%高压布比卡因2.2ml (11mg), BF组给予0.5%高压布比卡因2ml (10mg),芬太尼0.2ml(10µg)。比较术中内脏疼痛发生率、产妇血流动力学、不良反应及APGAR评分。结果:在子宫外展术中,BF组11%的产妇诉说术中内脏疼痛,B组44%的产妇诉说术中内脏疼痛,两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.002)。BF组术中抢救性镇痛占22%,B组术中抢救性镇痛占33% (p= 0.29)。两组产妇的血压、心率、血氧饱和度、呼吸频率等重要指标比较,差异无统计学意义。两组APGAR评分相近。结论:在高压布比卡因基础上鞘内加用芬太尼可有效减少剖宫产术中内脏疼痛,产妇血流动力学稳定,无新生儿副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with and Without Fentanyl in Reducing Visceral Pain During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anaesthesia.

Background: Visceral pain occurred during cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia can be decreased with a higher dose of bupivacaine. However, larger doses of bupivacaine increases the risk of high sensory block. We hypothesized that addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine intrathecally could intensifies the sensory block and improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia. The aim of this study is to compare incidence of visceral pain between hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 72 term parturient with ASA PS II undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly distributed into two groups. Group B received 2.2ml (11mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine while Group BF received 2 ml (10mg) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2ml (10µg) of fentanyl intrathecally. Incidence of intraoperative visceral pain, maternal hemodynamics, side effects and APGAR score were compared.

Results: During exteriorization of uterus, 11% of parturient in Group BF and 44% parturient in Group B complained of intraoperative visceral pain with significant difference between two group (p=0.002). The intraoperative rescue analgesia was given in 22 % parturient in Group BF and 33% parturient in Group B (p= 0.29). Maternal vital parameters like blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were comparable between two groups. APGAR score was similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Addition of intrathecal fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine was effective in reducing intraoperative visceral pain during cesarean delivery with stable maternal hemodynamics and without neonatal side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信