肝细胞癌反应评估:放射科医师入门。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nayla Mroueh, Jinjin Cao, Shravya Srinivas Rao, Soumyadeep Ghosh, Ok Kyu Song, Sasiprang Kongboonvijit, Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle, Avinash Kambadakone
{"title":"肝细胞癌反应评估:放射科医师入门。","authors":"Nayla Mroueh, Jinjin Cao, Shravya Srinivas Rao, Soumyadeep Ghosh, Ok Kyu Song, Sasiprang Kongboonvijit, Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle, Avinash Kambadakone","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating accurate and early diagnosis to guide therapy, along with assessment of treatment response. Response assessment criteria have evolved from traditional morphologic approaches, such as WHO criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to more recent methods focused on evaluating viable tumor burden, including European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) criteria, modified RECIST (mRECIST) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response (LI-TR) algorithm. This shift reflects the complex and evolving landscape of HCC treatment in the context of emerging systemic and locoregional therapies. Each of these criteria have their own nuanced strengths and limitations in capturing the detailed characteristics of HCC treatment and response assessment. The emergence of functional imaging techniques, including dual-energy CT, perfusion imaging, and rising use of radiomics, are enhancing the capabilities of response assessment. Growth in the realm of artificial intelligence and machine learning models provides an opportunity to refine the precision of response assessment by facilitating analysis of complex imaging data patterns. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of existing criteria, discusses functional and emerging imaging techniques, and outlines future directions for advancing HCC tumor response assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response Assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Primer for Radiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Nayla Mroueh, Jinjin Cao, Shravya Srinivas Rao, Soumyadeep Ghosh, Ok Kyu Song, Sasiprang Kongboonvijit, Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle, Avinash Kambadakone\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating accurate and early diagnosis to guide therapy, along with assessment of treatment response. Response assessment criteria have evolved from traditional morphologic approaches, such as WHO criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to more recent methods focused on evaluating viable tumor burden, including European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) criteria, modified RECIST (mRECIST) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response (LI-TR) algorithm. This shift reflects the complex and evolving landscape of HCC treatment in the context of emerging systemic and locoregional therapies. Each of these criteria have their own nuanced strengths and limitations in capturing the detailed characteristics of HCC treatment and response assessment. The emergence of functional imaging techniques, including dual-energy CT, perfusion imaging, and rising use of radiomics, are enhancing the capabilities of response assessment. Growth in the realm of artificial intelligence and machine learning models provides an opportunity to refine the precision of response assessment by facilitating analysis of complex imaging data patterns. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of existing criteria, discusses functional and emerging imaging techniques, and outlines future directions for advancing HCC tumor response assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001789\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球癌症相关死亡的第三大原因,需要准确和早期诊断来指导治疗,并评估治疗反应。反应评估标准已经从传统的形态学方法,如WHO标准和实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST),发展到最近专注于评估活肿瘤负担的方法,包括欧洲肝脏研究协会(EASL)标准、改进的RECIST (mRECIST)和肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应(LI-TR)算法。这种转变反映了在新兴的全身和局部治疗的背景下,HCC治疗的复杂和不断发展的前景。这些标准在捕捉HCC治疗和反应评估的详细特征方面都有其细微的优势和局限性。功能成像技术的出现,包括双能CT、灌注成像和放射组学的使用,正在提高反应评估的能力。人工智能和机器学习模型领域的发展为通过促进复杂成像数据模式的分析来改进响应评估的精度提供了机会。这篇综述文章提供了现有标准的全面概述,讨论了功能和新兴的成像技术,并概述了推进HCC肿瘤反应评估的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response Assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Primer for Radiologists.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating accurate and early diagnosis to guide therapy, along with assessment of treatment response. Response assessment criteria have evolved from traditional morphologic approaches, such as WHO criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to more recent methods focused on evaluating viable tumor burden, including European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) criteria, modified RECIST (mRECIST) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response (LI-TR) algorithm. This shift reflects the complex and evolving landscape of HCC treatment in the context of emerging systemic and locoregional therapies. Each of these criteria have their own nuanced strengths and limitations in capturing the detailed characteristics of HCC treatment and response assessment. The emergence of functional imaging techniques, including dual-energy CT, perfusion imaging, and rising use of radiomics, are enhancing the capabilities of response assessment. Growth in the realm of artificial intelligence and machine learning models provides an opportunity to refine the precision of response assessment by facilitating analysis of complex imaging data patterns. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of existing criteria, discusses functional and emerging imaging techniques, and outlines future directions for advancing HCC tumor response assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信