良性前列腺增生水中消融与其他手术治疗30、90天疗效的比较分析。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1177/08927790251364272
Isabella S Florissi, Taylor Kohn, Dianelis G Pupo, Liam Nugent, Mark N Alshak, Pranjal Agrawal, Naren Nimmagadda
{"title":"良性前列腺增生水中消融与其他手术治疗30、90天疗效的比较分析。","authors":"Isabella S Florissi, Taylor Kohn, Dianelis G Pupo, Liam Nugent, Mark N Alshak, Pranjal Agrawal, Naren Nimmagadda","doi":"10.1177/08927790251364272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Short-term outcomes of Aquablation as the treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have not been well characterized. The aim of this analysis was to compare rates of 30- and 90-day complications following Aquablation with those after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), UroLift, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (SP). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the TriNetX Research database, a collaborative claims and electronic medical record research network of 79 large health care organizations, we conducted a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent Aquablation (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 0421T or Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System ((HCPCS) C2596), TURP (CPT 52601), UroLift (CPT 52441), HoLEP (CPT 52649), or laparoscopic SP (CPT 55866, 55867) between the dates of January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. We performed a propensity score matching for age at time of operation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) range to determine the relative risk of developing the following outcomes at 30- and 90-days postoperatively: visit to the emergency department, hospital readmission, catheter re-insertion, and urinary tract infection. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Prior to matching, data were available for 1054 Aquablation, 18,945 TURP, 3966 UroLift, 5200 HoLEP, and 5369 laparoscopic SP patients; 53% of Aquablation cases were performed in 2023. After matching Aquablation to each other procedure, the cohorts ranged in size from 1048 to 1054. At 30 and 90 days postoperatively, patients who underwent Aquablation were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital and require catheter re-insertion than most operative cohorts. When eliminating from the analysis patients who underwent Aquablation in 2023, the association between Aquablation and readmission did not persist. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients undergoing Aquablation may experience higher rates of hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days postoperatively than most other surgical BPH cohorts, which may be because of the learning curve associated with the procedure or applying the procedure to larger prostate volumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"862-870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of 30- and 90-Day Outcomes of Aquablation vs Other Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Isabella S Florissi, Taylor Kohn, Dianelis G Pupo, Liam Nugent, Mark N Alshak, Pranjal Agrawal, Naren Nimmagadda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08927790251364272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Short-term outcomes of Aquablation as the treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have not been well characterized. The aim of this analysis was to compare rates of 30- and 90-day complications following Aquablation with those after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), UroLift, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (SP). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the TriNetX Research database, a collaborative claims and electronic medical record research network of 79 large health care organizations, we conducted a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent Aquablation (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 0421T or Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System ((HCPCS) C2596), TURP (CPT 52601), UroLift (CPT 52441), HoLEP (CPT 52649), or laparoscopic SP (CPT 55866, 55867) between the dates of January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. We performed a propensity score matching for age at time of operation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) range to determine the relative risk of developing the following outcomes at 30- and 90-days postoperatively: visit to the emergency department, hospital readmission, catheter re-insertion, and urinary tract infection. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Prior to matching, data were available for 1054 Aquablation, 18,945 TURP, 3966 UroLift, 5200 HoLEP, and 5369 laparoscopic SP patients; 53% of Aquablation cases were performed in 2023. After matching Aquablation to each other procedure, the cohorts ranged in size from 1048 to 1054. At 30 and 90 days postoperatively, patients who underwent Aquablation were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital and require catheter re-insertion than most operative cohorts. When eliminating from the analysis patients who underwent Aquablation in 2023, the association between Aquablation and readmission did not persist. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients undergoing Aquablation may experience higher rates of hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days postoperatively than most other surgical BPH cohorts, which may be because of the learning curve associated with the procedure or applying the procedure to larger prostate volumes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"862-870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251364272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251364272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:水溶消融术治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的短期疗效尚未明确。本分析的目的是比较经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)、UroLift、钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)和腹腔镜单纯前列腺切除术(SP)后30天和90天并发症的发生率。方法:使用TriNetX研究数据库(79家大型医疗机构的协作索赔和电子医疗记录研究网络),我们对2017年1月1日期间接受水溶术(现行程序术语[CPT] 0421T或医疗保健通用程序编码系统((HCPCS) C2596)、TURP (CPT 52601)、UroLift (CPT 52441)、HoLEP (CPT 52649)或腹腔镜SP (CPT 55866、55867)的所有患者进行了倾向匹配的回顾性队列研究。2023年12月31日。我们对手术时的年龄、糖尿病、高血压、肥胖和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)范围进行了倾向评分,以确定术后30天和90天发生以下结果的相对风险:急诊就诊、再次住院、重新插入导尿管和尿路感染。结果:匹配前,有1054例Aquablation、18945例TURP、3966例UroLift、5200例HoLEP和5369例腹腔镜SP患者的数据;2023年进行了53%的水消融。在将Aquablation与其他方法相匹配后,队列的大小从1048到1054不等。在术后30天和90天,接受水消融的患者比大多数手术组更有可能再次入院并需要重新插入导管。当从分析中剔除2023年接受过水合消融术的患者时,水合消融术与再入院之间的关联不存在。结论:接受水溶消融的患者在术后30天和90天的再入院率可能高于大多数其他手术BPH组,这可能是因为与该手术相关的学习曲线或将该手术应用于更大的前列腺体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of 30- and 90-Day Outcomes of Aquablation vs Other Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Background: Short-term outcomes of Aquablation as the treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have not been well characterized. The aim of this analysis was to compare rates of 30- and 90-day complications following Aquablation with those after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), UroLift, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (SP). Methods: Using the TriNetX Research database, a collaborative claims and electronic medical record research network of 79 large health care organizations, we conducted a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent Aquablation (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 0421T or Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System ((HCPCS) C2596), TURP (CPT 52601), UroLift (CPT 52441), HoLEP (CPT 52649), or laparoscopic SP (CPT 55866, 55867) between the dates of January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. We performed a propensity score matching for age at time of operation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) range to determine the relative risk of developing the following outcomes at 30- and 90-days postoperatively: visit to the emergency department, hospital readmission, catheter re-insertion, and urinary tract infection. Results: Prior to matching, data were available for 1054 Aquablation, 18,945 TURP, 3966 UroLift, 5200 HoLEP, and 5369 laparoscopic SP patients; 53% of Aquablation cases were performed in 2023. After matching Aquablation to each other procedure, the cohorts ranged in size from 1048 to 1054. At 30 and 90 days postoperatively, patients who underwent Aquablation were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital and require catheter re-insertion than most operative cohorts. When eliminating from the analysis patients who underwent Aquablation in 2023, the association between Aquablation and readmission did not persist. Conclusions: Patients undergoing Aquablation may experience higher rates of hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days postoperatively than most other surgical BPH cohorts, which may be because of the learning curve associated with the procedure or applying the procedure to larger prostate volumes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信