Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton
{"title":"评估国家预防自杀战略实现目标的程度。","authors":"Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120021"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the extent to which targets are achieved in national suicide prevention strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the extent to which targets are achieved in national suicide prevention strategies.
Background: Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.
Methods: A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.
Results: We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.
Limitations: Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.
Conclusions: A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.