评估国家预防自杀战略实现目标的程度。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021
Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton
{"title":"评估国家预防自杀战略实现目标的程度。","authors":"Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120021"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the extent to which targets are achieved in national suicide prevention strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Canal-Rivero, Jane Pirkis, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Nicholas, Miguel Ruiz-Veguilla, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Angela Clapperton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些国家已经实施了国家自杀预防战略(NSPSs),其中一些包括与减少自杀和/或自杀行为有关的具体目标。本研究旨在:(1)确定包含目标的NSPSs的比例;(2)评估这些目标是否实现。方法:使用相关数据库对NSPSs进行综合评价,以确定具有明确目标的NSPSs。咨询了官方机构,以核实目标的实现情况,并收集自杀行为的数据。结果:我们确定了54个国家战略进行分析,其中27个(50% %)包含具体的定量目标。其中11项战略已经过了预定日期,并有可供评估的数据。在这11个国家中,只有智利和以色列两个国家实现了它们的目标。其余9个国家的结果各不相同:保加利亚和巴拿马观察到非统计上显著的减少。爱尔兰也出现了减少,虽然在数量上超过了目标,但在统计上并不显著。英格兰的发病率保持稳定,而北爱尔兰、美国、苏格兰和乌拉圭的发病率有所上升。局限性:虽然数据来源于官方记录,但潜在的偏差可能会影响分析的质量和准确性。结论:相当大比例的国家安全报告缺乏具体目标,即使在那些有具体目标的国家安全报告中,实现这些目标对许多国家来说仍然是一个挑战。但是,具体目标的存在至少有助于查明妨碍实现这些目标的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the extent to which targets are achieved in national suicide prevention strategies.

Background: Several countries have implemented National Suicide Prevention Strategies (NSPSs), some of which include specific targets relating to reductions in suicide and/or suicidal behaviour. This study aimed to: (1) identify the proportion of NSPSs that include targets; and (2) assess whether these targets were achieved.

Methods: A comprehensive review of NSPSs was conducted using relevant databases to identify those with defined targets. Official agencies were consulted to verify target achievement and to gather data on suicidal behaviour.

Results: We identified 54 national strategies for analysis, of which 27 (50 %) included specific, quantitative targets. Eleven of these strategies had passed their target date and had available data for assessment. Of these eleven, only two countries, Chile and Israel, achieved their targets. For the remaining nine, outcomes varied: non-statistically significant reductions were observed in Bulgaria and Panama. Ireland also saw a reduction that, while numerically surpassing its target, was not statistically significant. Rates remained stable in England, and increased in Northern Ireland, the United States, Scotland, and Uruguay.

Limitations: Although the data were sourced from official records, potential biases may have affected the quality and accuracy of the analysis.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of NSPSs lack specific targets and even among those that have specific targets, achieving these remains a challenge for many. However, the presence of specific targets could at least facilitate the identification of barriers hindering the attainment of these targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信