对小脑分割的扩散MRI图像对比度的明智选择。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Jon Haitz Legarreta, Zhou Lan, Yuqian Chen, Fan Zhang, Edward H Yeterian, Nikos Makris, Richard J Rushmore, Yogesh Rathi, Lauren J O'Donnell
{"title":"对小脑分割的扩散MRI图像对比度的明智选择。","authors":"Jon Haitz Legarreta, Zhou Lan, Yuqian Chen, Fan Zhang, Edward H Yeterian, Nikos Makris, Richard J Rushmore, Yogesh Rathi, Lauren J O'Donnell","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fine-grained segmentation of cerebellar structures is an essential step towards supplying increasingly accurate anatomically informed analyses, including, for example, white matter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Cerebellar tissue segmentation is typically performed on structural MRI data, such as T1-weighted data, while connectivity between segmented regions is mapped using diffusion MRI tractography data. Small deviations in structural to diffusion MRI data co-registration may negatively impact connectivity analyses. Reliable segmentation of brain tissue performed directly on diffusion MRI data helps to circumvent such inaccuracies. Diffusion MRI enables the computation of many image contrasts, including a variety of tissue microstructure maps. While multiple methods have been proposed for the segmentation of cerebellar structures using diffusion MRI, little attention has been paid to the systematic evaluation of the performance of different available input image contrasts for the segmentation task. In this work, we evaluate and compare the segmentation performance of diffusion MRI-derived contrasts on the cerebellar segmentation task. Specifically, we include spherical mean (diffusion-weighted image average) and b0 (non-diffusion-weighted image average) contrasts, local signal parameterization contrasts (diffusion tensor and kurtosis fit maps), and the structural T1-weighted MRI contrast that is most commonly employed for the task. We train a popular deep-learning architecture using a publicly available dataset (HCP-YA) on a set of cerebellar white and gray matter region labels obtained from the atlas-based SUIT cerebellar segmentation pipeline employing T1-weighted data. By training and testing using many diffusion-MRI-derived image inputs, we find that the spherical mean image computed from b = 1000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> shell data provides stable performance across different metrics and significantly outperforms the tissue microstructure contrasts that are traditionally used in machine learning segmentation methods for diffusion MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 11","pages":"e70317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Informed Choice of Diffusion MRI Image Contrasts for Cerebellar Segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Haitz Legarreta, Zhou Lan, Yuqian Chen, Fan Zhang, Edward H Yeterian, Nikos Makris, Richard J Rushmore, Yogesh Rathi, Lauren J O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fine-grained segmentation of cerebellar structures is an essential step towards supplying increasingly accurate anatomically informed analyses, including, for example, white matter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Cerebellar tissue segmentation is typically performed on structural MRI data, such as T1-weighted data, while connectivity between segmented regions is mapped using diffusion MRI tractography data. Small deviations in structural to diffusion MRI data co-registration may negatively impact connectivity analyses. Reliable segmentation of brain tissue performed directly on diffusion MRI data helps to circumvent such inaccuracies. Diffusion MRI enables the computation of many image contrasts, including a variety of tissue microstructure maps. While multiple methods have been proposed for the segmentation of cerebellar structures using diffusion MRI, little attention has been paid to the systematic evaluation of the performance of different available input image contrasts for the segmentation task. In this work, we evaluate and compare the segmentation performance of diffusion MRI-derived contrasts on the cerebellar segmentation task. Specifically, we include spherical mean (diffusion-weighted image average) and b0 (non-diffusion-weighted image average) contrasts, local signal parameterization contrasts (diffusion tensor and kurtosis fit maps), and the structural T1-weighted MRI contrast that is most commonly employed for the task. We train a popular deep-learning architecture using a publicly available dataset (HCP-YA) on a set of cerebellar white and gray matter region labels obtained from the atlas-based SUIT cerebellar segmentation pipeline employing T1-weighted data. By training and testing using many diffusion-MRI-derived image inputs, we find that the spherical mean image computed from b = 1000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> shell data provides stable performance across different metrics and significantly outperforms the tissue microstructure contrasts that are traditionally used in machine learning segmentation methods for diffusion MRI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 11\",\"pages\":\"e70317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12332183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70317\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小脑结构的细粒度分割是提供越来越准确的解剖学信息分析的重要一步,包括,例如,白质扩散磁共振成像(MRI)束状图。小脑组织分割通常是在结构性MRI数据上进行的,比如t1加权数据,而分割区域之间的连通性是使用弥散性MRI牵道成像数据绘制的。结构与扩散MRI数据共配准的小偏差可能对连通性分析产生负面影响。直接对弥散MRI数据进行脑组织的可靠分割有助于避免这种不准确性。扩散MRI能够计算许多图像对比,包括各种组织微观结构图。虽然已经提出了多种方法来使用弥散MRI分割小脑结构,但很少有人关注对分割任务中不同可用输入图像对比度的系统评估。在这项工作中,我们评估和比较了扩散mri衍生对比度在小脑分割任务中的分割性能。具体来说,我们包括球面平均值(扩散加权图像平均值)和b0(非扩散加权图像平均值)对比,局部信号参数化对比(扩散张量和峰度拟合图),以及最常用于该任务的结构t1加权MRI对比。我们使用公开可用的数据集(HCP-YA)在一组小脑白质和灰质区域标签上训练了一个流行的深度学习架构,这些标签来自基于atlas的SUIT小脑分割管道,采用t1加权数据。通过使用许多弥散MRI衍生图像输入进行训练和测试,我们发现从b = 1000 s/mm2壳数据计算的球形平均图像在不同指标上提供了稳定的性能,并且显著优于传统上用于弥散MRI机器学习分割方法的组织微观结构对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an Informed Choice of Diffusion MRI Image Contrasts for Cerebellar Segmentation.

The fine-grained segmentation of cerebellar structures is an essential step towards supplying increasingly accurate anatomically informed analyses, including, for example, white matter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Cerebellar tissue segmentation is typically performed on structural MRI data, such as T1-weighted data, while connectivity between segmented regions is mapped using diffusion MRI tractography data. Small deviations in structural to diffusion MRI data co-registration may negatively impact connectivity analyses. Reliable segmentation of brain tissue performed directly on diffusion MRI data helps to circumvent such inaccuracies. Diffusion MRI enables the computation of many image contrasts, including a variety of tissue microstructure maps. While multiple methods have been proposed for the segmentation of cerebellar structures using diffusion MRI, little attention has been paid to the systematic evaluation of the performance of different available input image contrasts for the segmentation task. In this work, we evaluate and compare the segmentation performance of diffusion MRI-derived contrasts on the cerebellar segmentation task. Specifically, we include spherical mean (diffusion-weighted image average) and b0 (non-diffusion-weighted image average) contrasts, local signal parameterization contrasts (diffusion tensor and kurtosis fit maps), and the structural T1-weighted MRI contrast that is most commonly employed for the task. We train a popular deep-learning architecture using a publicly available dataset (HCP-YA) on a set of cerebellar white and gray matter region labels obtained from the atlas-based SUIT cerebellar segmentation pipeline employing T1-weighted data. By training and testing using many diffusion-MRI-derived image inputs, we find that the spherical mean image computed from b = 1000 s/mm2 shell data provides stable performance across different metrics and significantly outperforms the tissue microstructure contrasts that are traditionally used in machine learning segmentation methods for diffusion MRI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信