人工耳蜗使用者对电极或调制频率变化的反应时间。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hearing Research Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375
E Noordanus, L H M Mens, A J van Opstal
{"title":"人工耳蜗使用者对电极或调制频率变化的反应时间。","authors":"E Noordanus, L H M Mens, A J van Opstal","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatial and temporal selectivity vary substantially between cochlear implant users, resulting in large differences in speech perception. Direct electrode stimulation offers precise control to capture this variability. However, most studies using direct stimulation have not incorporated interfering stimuli, which may not reflect the complex nature of speech and ambient noise. To address this gap, we introduce the Electrode Interaction Reaction Time (ELI-RT) paradigm, which uses amplitude-modulated, interleaved pulses on two closely spaced electrodes at clinical pulse rates. ELI-RT includes two test types: \"∆EL\", measuring the participants' manual reaction times to a change in stimulated electrode, and \"∆MF\", measuring reaction times to a modulation frequency change. Both tests include ongoing interference on an adjacent electrode. We also measured speech-in-noise recognition thresholds. We analyzed data from 16 unilateral cochlear implant users and found that ELI-RT could dissociate participant-, electrode-, and test-dependent factors. The effect of the electrode location along the array differed considerably between participants. The ∆EL and ∆MF tests provided partly complementary insights. Reaction times on these tests correlated with speech-in-noise perception, especially for changes that typically yielded shorter reaction times and for electrodes located in the middle of the array. In conclusion, reaction times to changes in the place of stimulation and modulation frequency, in the presence of interference from an adjacent electrode, offer detailed insights into the acuity of information transfer along the cochlear implant electrode array to the central auditory pathways in cochlear implant users.</p>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"466 ","pages":"109375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaction times of cochlear implant users to a change in electrode or modulation frequency in the presence of a masker.\",\"authors\":\"E Noordanus, L H M Mens, A J van Opstal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spatial and temporal selectivity vary substantially between cochlear implant users, resulting in large differences in speech perception. Direct electrode stimulation offers precise control to capture this variability. However, most studies using direct stimulation have not incorporated interfering stimuli, which may not reflect the complex nature of speech and ambient noise. To address this gap, we introduce the Electrode Interaction Reaction Time (ELI-RT) paradigm, which uses amplitude-modulated, interleaved pulses on two closely spaced electrodes at clinical pulse rates. ELI-RT includes two test types: \\\"∆EL\\\", measuring the participants' manual reaction times to a change in stimulated electrode, and \\\"∆MF\\\", measuring reaction times to a modulation frequency change. Both tests include ongoing interference on an adjacent electrode. We also measured speech-in-noise recognition thresholds. We analyzed data from 16 unilateral cochlear implant users and found that ELI-RT could dissociate participant-, electrode-, and test-dependent factors. The effect of the electrode location along the array differed considerably between participants. The ∆EL and ∆MF tests provided partly complementary insights. Reaction times on these tests correlated with speech-in-noise perception, especially for changes that typically yielded shorter reaction times and for electrodes located in the middle of the array. In conclusion, reaction times to changes in the place of stimulation and modulation frequency, in the presence of interference from an adjacent electrode, offer detailed insights into the acuity of information transfer along the cochlear implant electrode array to the central auditory pathways in cochlear implant users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"466 \",\"pages\":\"109375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2025.109375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空间和时间选择性在人工耳蜗使用者之间存在很大差异,导致语音感知的巨大差异。直接电极刺激提供了精确的控制,以捕获这种可变性。然而,大多数使用直接刺激的研究并未纳入干扰刺激,这可能无法反映语音和环境噪声的复杂性。为了解决这一差距,我们引入了电极相互作用反应时间(ELI-RT)范式,该范式在两个紧密间隔的电极上以临床脉搏率使用幅度调制的交错脉冲。ELI-RT包括两种测试类型:“∆EL”,测量受试者对受激电极变化的手动反应时间;“∆MF”,测量调制频率变化的反应时间。两种测试都包括对相邻电极的持续干扰。我们还测量了噪声中的语音识别阈值。我们分析了16位单侧人工耳蜗使用者的数据,发现ELI-RT可以分离参与者、电极和测试依赖因素。电极沿阵列位置的影响在参与者之间有相当大的差异。∆EL和∆MF试验提供了部分互补的见解。这些测试中的反应时间与噪音中的语音感知相关,特别是对于通常产生较短反应时间的变化和位于阵列中间的电极。总之,在邻近电极存在干扰的情况下,对刺激位置和调制频率变化的反应时间,可以详细了解人工耳蜗使用者沿人工耳蜗电极阵列向中央听觉通路传递信息的敏锐度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reaction times of cochlear implant users to a change in electrode or modulation frequency in the presence of a masker.

Spatial and temporal selectivity vary substantially between cochlear implant users, resulting in large differences in speech perception. Direct electrode stimulation offers precise control to capture this variability. However, most studies using direct stimulation have not incorporated interfering stimuli, which may not reflect the complex nature of speech and ambient noise. To address this gap, we introduce the Electrode Interaction Reaction Time (ELI-RT) paradigm, which uses amplitude-modulated, interleaved pulses on two closely spaced electrodes at clinical pulse rates. ELI-RT includes two test types: "∆EL", measuring the participants' manual reaction times to a change in stimulated electrode, and "∆MF", measuring reaction times to a modulation frequency change. Both tests include ongoing interference on an adjacent electrode. We also measured speech-in-noise recognition thresholds. We analyzed data from 16 unilateral cochlear implant users and found that ELI-RT could dissociate participant-, electrode-, and test-dependent factors. The effect of the electrode location along the array differed considerably between participants. The ∆EL and ∆MF tests provided partly complementary insights. Reaction times on these tests correlated with speech-in-noise perception, especially for changes that typically yielded shorter reaction times and for electrodes located in the middle of the array. In conclusion, reaction times to changes in the place of stimulation and modulation frequency, in the presence of interference from an adjacent electrode, offer detailed insights into the acuity of information transfer along the cochlear implant electrode array to the central auditory pathways in cochlear implant users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信