James Cochran, Nancy Deng, Ameer Tabbaa, Afshin Razi, Sara Abu-Ghanem
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后的吞咽困难:发生率、危险因素和干预措施的PearlDiver分析。","authors":"James Cochran, Nancy Deng, Ameer Tabbaa, Afshin Razi, Sara Abu-Ghanem","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical procedure, with wide variation in reported postoperative dysphagia rates (1-79%). No standardized guidelines exist for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative ACDF dysphagia. The goal of the current study is to utilize a large database of US healthcare insurance claims to investigate incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF as well as risk factors for dysphagia and interventions performed in a large patient cohort. PearlDiver database was used to identify patients without preoperative dysphagia undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2022 and create cohorts of patients with and without postoperative ACDF dysphagia. International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrieve patient records. The two cohorts were compared in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior neck surgery, postoperative vocal fold paralysis, and dysphagia related interventions. OR with 95% CI were calculated, stratifying by various risk factors. Prevalence of various postoperative diagnoses and interventions were calculated. Of 618,170 patients undergoing primary ACDF from 2010 to 2022, 88,899 (14.4%) developed postoperative dysphagia. Females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients had higher odds of developing post ACDF dysphagia (OR 1.14, 2.51, 2.18, 2.50 respectively). 3% of patients with post ACDF dysphagia had new postoperative vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) versus 0.3% without dysphagia (OR 8.69). Within the dysphagia cohort,14.9% underwent laryngoscopy, 19.0% underwent MBSS, 0.80% underwent FEES, and 5.2% received swallow therapy. Dysphagia is commonly diagnosed after ACDF, with females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients having the highest odds of diagnosis. Yet, a low percentage of patients are being referred for evaluation or treatment. Providers performing ACDF should consider screening protocols and early referral to providers offering interventions for dysphagia diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A PearlDiver Analysis of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"James Cochran, Nancy Deng, Ameer Tabbaa, Afshin Razi, Sara Abu-Ghanem\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical procedure, with wide variation in reported postoperative dysphagia rates (1-79%). No standardized guidelines exist for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative ACDF dysphagia. The goal of the current study is to utilize a large database of US healthcare insurance claims to investigate incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF as well as risk factors for dysphagia and interventions performed in a large patient cohort. PearlDiver database was used to identify patients without preoperative dysphagia undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2022 and create cohorts of patients with and without postoperative ACDF dysphagia. International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrieve patient records. The two cohorts were compared in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior neck surgery, postoperative vocal fold paralysis, and dysphagia related interventions. OR with 95% CI were calculated, stratifying by various risk factors. Prevalence of various postoperative diagnoses and interventions were calculated. Of 618,170 patients undergoing primary ACDF from 2010 to 2022, 88,899 (14.4%) developed postoperative dysphagia. Females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients had higher odds of developing post ACDF dysphagia (OR 1.14, 2.51, 2.18, 2.50 respectively). 3% of patients with post ACDF dysphagia had new postoperative vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) versus 0.3% without dysphagia (OR 8.69). Within the dysphagia cohort,14.9% underwent laryngoscopy, 19.0% underwent MBSS, 0.80% underwent FEES, and 5.2% received swallow therapy. Dysphagia is commonly diagnosed after ACDF, with females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients having the highest odds of diagnosis. Yet, a low percentage of patients are being referred for evaluation or treatment. Providers performing ACDF should consider screening protocols and early referral to providers offering interventions for dysphagia diagnosis and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dysphagia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dysphagia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10867-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A PearlDiver Analysis of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Interventions.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical procedure, with wide variation in reported postoperative dysphagia rates (1-79%). No standardized guidelines exist for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of postoperative ACDF dysphagia. The goal of the current study is to utilize a large database of US healthcare insurance claims to investigate incidence of dysphagia post-ACDF as well as risk factors for dysphagia and interventions performed in a large patient cohort. PearlDiver database was used to identify patients without preoperative dysphagia undergoing ACDF between 2010 and 2022 and create cohorts of patients with and without postoperative ACDF dysphagia. International Classification of Disease version 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrieve patient records. The two cohorts were compared in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, prior neck surgery, postoperative vocal fold paralysis, and dysphagia related interventions. OR with 95% CI were calculated, stratifying by various risk factors. Prevalence of various postoperative diagnoses and interventions were calculated. Of 618,170 patients undergoing primary ACDF from 2010 to 2022, 88,899 (14.4%) developed postoperative dysphagia. Females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients had higher odds of developing post ACDF dysphagia (OR 1.14, 2.51, 2.18, 2.50 respectively). 3% of patients with post ACDF dysphagia had new postoperative vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) versus 0.3% without dysphagia (OR 8.69). Within the dysphagia cohort,14.9% underwent laryngoscopy, 19.0% underwent MBSS, 0.80% underwent FEES, and 5.2% received swallow therapy. Dysphagia is commonly diagnosed after ACDF, with females, smokers, diabetics, and obese patients having the highest odds of diagnosis. Yet, a low percentage of patients are being referred for evaluation or treatment. Providers performing ACDF should consider screening protocols and early referral to providers offering interventions for dysphagia diagnosis and treatment.
期刊介绍:
Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.