Christoph Fraenz, Dorothea Metzen, Christian J Merz, Helene Selpien, Patrick Friedrich, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Nikolai Axmacher, Erhan Genç
{"title":"恐惧学习在静止状态下塑造了超越传统恐惧网络的功能性大脑连接。","authors":"Christoph Fraenz, Dorothea Metzen, Christian J Merz, Helene Selpien, Patrick Friedrich, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Nikolai Axmacher, Erhan Genç","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroscientific research has identified specific brain networks involved in the acquisition of fear memories. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess changes in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) induced by fear acquisition, single brain regions from these networks have been linked to fear memory consolidation. However, previous studies merely examined RSFC changes within restricted sets of brain regions or without a proper control group, leaving our knowledge about fear consolidation outside of traditional fear networks incomplete. Here, an experimental group of 98 and a control group of 28 individuals, free of self-reported psychiatric or neurological disorders, participated in a differential fear conditioning paradigm using visual stimuli and electrical stimulation. Fear responses were quantified by skin conductance responses. RSFC changes were analyzed across 360 cortical and 16 subcortical brain regions, constituting a total of 70,500 functional connections. Subsequent to fear acquisition, we identified 21 functional connections, involving 35 individual brain regions, that exhibited significant RSFC changes in the experimental compared to the control group. Importantly, these connections were not restricted to traditional fear networks but also comprised various frontal, visual, premotor, and somatosensory regions. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of employing a proper control group and indicate that fear memory consolidation is a complex process that integrates relevant information across the entire brain. Brain regions recruited for this task presumably depend on the modality of acquired fear memories, which demands an update regarding the components of established fear networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear learning sculpts functional brain connectivity at rest beyond the traditional fear network.\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Fraenz, Dorothea Metzen, Christian J Merz, Helene Selpien, Patrick Friedrich, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Nikolai Axmacher, Erhan Genç\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuroscientific research has identified specific brain networks involved in the acquisition of fear memories. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess changes in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) induced by fear acquisition, single brain regions from these networks have been linked to fear memory consolidation. However, previous studies merely examined RSFC changes within restricted sets of brain regions or without a proper control group, leaving our knowledge about fear consolidation outside of traditional fear networks incomplete. Here, an experimental group of 98 and a control group of 28 individuals, free of self-reported psychiatric or neurological disorders, participated in a differential fear conditioning paradigm using visual stimuli and electrical stimulation. Fear responses were quantified by skin conductance responses. RSFC changes were analyzed across 360 cortical and 16 subcortical brain regions, constituting a total of 70,500 functional connections. Subsequent to fear acquisition, we identified 21 functional connections, involving 35 individual brain regions, that exhibited significant RSFC changes in the experimental compared to the control group. Importantly, these connections were not restricted to traditional fear networks but also comprised various frontal, visual, premotor, and somatosensory regions. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of employing a proper control group and indicate that fear memory consolidation is a complex process that integrates relevant information across the entire brain. Brain regions recruited for this task presumably depend on the modality of acquired fear memories, which demands an update regarding the components of established fear networks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115764\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fear learning sculpts functional brain connectivity at rest beyond the traditional fear network.
Neuroscientific research has identified specific brain networks involved in the acquisition of fear memories. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess changes in resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) induced by fear acquisition, single brain regions from these networks have been linked to fear memory consolidation. However, previous studies merely examined RSFC changes within restricted sets of brain regions or without a proper control group, leaving our knowledge about fear consolidation outside of traditional fear networks incomplete. Here, an experimental group of 98 and a control group of 28 individuals, free of self-reported psychiatric or neurological disorders, participated in a differential fear conditioning paradigm using visual stimuli and electrical stimulation. Fear responses were quantified by skin conductance responses. RSFC changes were analyzed across 360 cortical and 16 subcortical brain regions, constituting a total of 70,500 functional connections. Subsequent to fear acquisition, we identified 21 functional connections, involving 35 individual brain regions, that exhibited significant RSFC changes in the experimental compared to the control group. Importantly, these connections were not restricted to traditional fear networks but also comprised various frontal, visual, premotor, and somatosensory regions. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of employing a proper control group and indicate that fear memory consolidation is a complex process that integrates relevant information across the entire brain. Brain regions recruited for this task presumably depend on the modality of acquired fear memories, which demands an update regarding the components of established fear networks.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.