drug-naïve首发、复发和服药的重度抑郁症患者的有效连通性改变:一项多位点fMRI研究

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-10-18 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115756
Peishan Dai, Kaineng Huang, Ting Hu, Qiongpu Chen, Shenghui Liao, Alessandro Grecucci, Xiaoping Yi, Bihong T Chen
{"title":"drug-naïve首发、复发和服药的重度抑郁症患者的有效连通性改变:一项多位点fMRI研究","authors":"Peishan Dai, Kaineng Huang, Ting Hu, Qiongpu Chen, Shenghui Liao, Alessandro Grecucci, Xiaoping Yi, Bihong T Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been diagnosed through subjective and inconsistent clinical assessments. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with connectivity analysis has been valuable for identifying neural correlates of patients with MDD, yet most studies rely on single-site and small sample sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized large-scale, multi-site rs-fMRI data from the Rest-meta-MDD consortium to assess effective connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, i.e., drug-naïve first-episode (FEDN), recurrent (RMDD), and medicated MDD (MMDD) subtypes. To mitigate site-related variability, the ComBat algorithm was applied, and multivariate linear regression was used to control for age and gender effects. A random forest classification model was developed to identify the most predictive features. Nested five-fold cross-validation was used to assess model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model effectively distinguished FEDN subtype from healthy controls (HC) group, achieving 90.13 % accuracy and 96.41 % AUC. However, classification performance for RMDD vs. FEDN and MMDD vs. FEDN was lower, suggesting that differences between the subtypes were less pronounced than differences between the patients with MDD and the HC group. Patients with RMDD exhibited more extensive connectivity abnormalities in the frontal-limbic system and default mode network than the patients with FEDN, implying heightened rumination. Additionally, treatment with medication appeared to partially modulate the aberrant connectivity, steering it toward normalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed altered brain connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, which could be classified with machine learning models with robust performance. Abnormal connectivity could be the potential neural correlates for the presenting symptoms of patients with MDD. These findings provide novel insights into the neural pathogenesis of patients with MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"115756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered effective connectivity in patients with drug-naïve first-episode, recurrent, and medicated major depressive disorder: A multi-site fMRI study.\",\"authors\":\"Peishan Dai, Kaineng Huang, Ting Hu, Qiongpu Chen, Shenghui Liao, Alessandro Grecucci, Xiaoping Yi, Bihong T Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been diagnosed through subjective and inconsistent clinical assessments. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with connectivity analysis has been valuable for identifying neural correlates of patients with MDD, yet most studies rely on single-site and small sample sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized large-scale, multi-site rs-fMRI data from the Rest-meta-MDD consortium to assess effective connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, i.e., drug-naïve first-episode (FEDN), recurrent (RMDD), and medicated MDD (MMDD) subtypes. To mitigate site-related variability, the ComBat algorithm was applied, and multivariate linear regression was used to control for age and gender effects. A random forest classification model was developed to identify the most predictive features. Nested five-fold cross-validation was used to assess model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model effectively distinguished FEDN subtype from healthy controls (HC) group, achieving 90.13 % accuracy and 96.41 % AUC. However, classification performance for RMDD vs. FEDN and MMDD vs. FEDN was lower, suggesting that differences between the subtypes were less pronounced than differences between the patients with MDD and the HC group. Patients with RMDD exhibited more extensive connectivity abnormalities in the frontal-limbic system and default mode network than the patients with FEDN, implying heightened rumination. Additionally, treatment with medication appeared to partially modulate the aberrant connectivity, steering it toward normalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed altered brain connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, which could be classified with machine learning models with robust performance. Abnormal connectivity could be the potential neural correlates for the presenting symptoms of patients with MDD. These findings provide novel insights into the neural pathogenesis of patients with MDD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"115756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115756\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是通过主观和不一致的临床评估来诊断的。静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)与连通性分析对于识别重度抑郁症患者的神经相关性很有价值,但大多数研究依赖于单点和小样本量。方法:本研究利用Rest-meta-MDD联盟的大规模、多位点rs-fMRI数据来评估MDD及其亚型(即drug-naïve首发(FEDN)、复发(RMDD)和用药型MDD (MMDD)亚型)患者的有效连通性。为了减轻与地点相关的可变性,应用了ComBat算法,并使用多元线性回归来控制年龄和性别的影响。开发了随机森林分类模型来识别最具预测性的特征。采用嵌套五重交叉验证来评估模型性能。结果:该模型能有效区分FEDN亚型与健康对照组(HC),准确率为90.13%,AUC为96.41%。然而,RMDD与FEDN和MMDD与FEDN的分类性能较低,表明亚型之间的差异不如MDD患者与HC组之间的差异明显。与FEDN患者相比,RMDD患者在额边缘系统和默认模式网络中表现出更广泛的连通性异常,这意味着反刍增强。此外,药物治疗似乎部分调节了异常的连通性,使其趋于正常化。结论:这项研究表明,重度抑郁症患者及其亚型的大脑连通性发生了改变,这可以通过具有强大性能的机器学习模型进行分类。异常连通性可能是MDD患者表现症状的潜在神经相关因素。这些发现为MDD患者的神经发病机制提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altered effective connectivity in patients with drug-naïve first-episode, recurrent, and medicated major depressive disorder: A multi-site fMRI study.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been diagnosed through subjective and inconsistent clinical assessments. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with connectivity analysis has been valuable for identifying neural correlates of patients with MDD, yet most studies rely on single-site and small sample sizes.

Methods: This study utilized large-scale, multi-site rs-fMRI data from the Rest-meta-MDD consortium to assess effective connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, i.e., drug-naïve first-episode (FEDN), recurrent (RMDD), and medicated MDD (MMDD) subtypes. To mitigate site-related variability, the ComBat algorithm was applied, and multivariate linear regression was used to control for age and gender effects. A random forest classification model was developed to identify the most predictive features. Nested five-fold cross-validation was used to assess model performance.

Results: The model effectively distinguished FEDN subtype from healthy controls (HC) group, achieving 90.13 % accuracy and 96.41 % AUC. However, classification performance for RMDD vs. FEDN and MMDD vs. FEDN was lower, suggesting that differences between the subtypes were less pronounced than differences between the patients with MDD and the HC group. Patients with RMDD exhibited more extensive connectivity abnormalities in the frontal-limbic system and default mode network than the patients with FEDN, implying heightened rumination. Additionally, treatment with medication appeared to partially modulate the aberrant connectivity, steering it toward normalization.

Conclusion: This study showed altered brain connectivity in patients with MDD and its subtypes, which could be classified with machine learning models with robust performance. Abnormal connectivity could be the potential neural correlates for the presenting symptoms of patients with MDD. These findings provide novel insights into the neural pathogenesis of patients with MDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信