在安非他明阳性尿液样本中发现的低甲基苯丙胺水平的起源和解释:支持安非他明甲基化作为次要代谢途径。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Anders Helander, Annika Andersson, Tomas Villén
{"title":"在安非他明阳性尿液样本中发现的低甲基苯丙胺水平的起源和解释:支持安非他明甲基化作为次要代谢途径。","authors":"Anders Helander, Annika Andersson, Tomas Villén","doi":"10.1002/dta.3940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methamphetamine is relatively uncommon on the European drug market, but Swedish drug test laboratories repeatedly detect low methamphetamine concentrations in urine samples containing high amphetamine levels, warranting clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. Of 12,062 routine samples screened positive for amphetamines, 86% were confirmed positive (≥ 200 μg/L) for amphetamine, 2.1% for methamphetamine, and 4.0% for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 259 methamphetamine-positive samples, 98% contained amphetamine concentrations above the reporting limit, consistent with the metabolic conversion of methamphetamine to amphetamine in the body. However, in most (69%) of these samples, the methamphetamine concentration was only < 2% of the amphetamine level, suggesting methamphetamine was not the primary drug taken. Chiral analysis of selected samples showed that after use of illicit street amphetamine with a racemic content of the l- and d-enantiomers, a similar l/d proportion was observed for methamphetamine. Similarly, in samples from patients receiving d-amphetamine-based ADHD medication, low d-methamphetamine levels were detected, even though the pharmaceutical products contained no methamphetamine. This observation, together with the parallel l/d-enantiomer distributions, supports amphetamine N-methylation as a trace, albeit quantitatively insignificant, metabolic pathway in humans. From both a clinical and forensic perspective, a low urinary methamphetamine concentration of less than a few percent of the amphetamine level therefore does not warrant further clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. The present findings further demonstrate that chiral analysis of both amphetamine and methamphetamine is an effective approach for distinguishing between illicit and therapeutic sources in positive screening drug tests for the amphetamines.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origin and Interpretation of Low Methamphetamine Levels Found in Amphetamine-Positive Urine Samples: Support for Methylation of Amphetamine as a Minor Metabolic Pathway.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Helander, Annika Andersson, Tomas Villén\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Methamphetamine is relatively uncommon on the European drug market, but Swedish drug test laboratories repeatedly detect low methamphetamine concentrations in urine samples containing high amphetamine levels, warranting clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. Of 12,062 routine samples screened positive for amphetamines, 86% were confirmed positive (≥ 200 μg/L) for amphetamine, 2.1% for methamphetamine, and 4.0% for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 259 methamphetamine-positive samples, 98% contained amphetamine concentrations above the reporting limit, consistent with the metabolic conversion of methamphetamine to amphetamine in the body. However, in most (69%) of these samples, the methamphetamine concentration was only < 2% of the amphetamine level, suggesting methamphetamine was not the primary drug taken. Chiral analysis of selected samples showed that after use of illicit street amphetamine with a racemic content of the l- and d-enantiomers, a similar l/d proportion was observed for methamphetamine. Similarly, in samples from patients receiving d-amphetamine-based ADHD medication, low d-methamphetamine levels were detected, even though the pharmaceutical products contained no methamphetamine. This observation, together with the parallel l/d-enantiomer distributions, supports amphetamine N-methylation as a trace, albeit quantitatively insignificant, metabolic pathway in humans. From both a clinical and forensic perspective, a low urinary methamphetamine concentration of less than a few percent of the amphetamine level therefore does not warrant further clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. The present findings further demonstrate that chiral analysis of both amphetamine and methamphetamine is an effective approach for distinguishing between illicit and therapeutic sources in positive screening drug tests for the amphetamines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3940\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲基苯丙胺在欧洲毒品市场上相对不常见,但瑞典药物测试实验室反复在含有高含量甲基苯丙胺的尿样中检测到低浓度甲基苯丙胺,因此有必要对疑似使用多种药物进行临床评估。通过液相色谱-串联质谱分析,在12062份常规样品中,安非他明检测阳性率为86%(≥200 μg/L),甲基苯丙胺检测阳性率为2.1%,3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)检测阳性率为4.0%。在259个甲基苯丙胺阳性样本中,98%的甲基苯丙胺浓度高于报告限值,与甲基苯丙胺在体内代谢转化为安非他明的情况一致。然而,在大多数(69%)样本中,甲基苯丙胺的浓度仅为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Origin and Interpretation of Low Methamphetamine Levels Found in Amphetamine-Positive Urine Samples: Support for Methylation of Amphetamine as a Minor Metabolic Pathway.

Methamphetamine is relatively uncommon on the European drug market, but Swedish drug test laboratories repeatedly detect low methamphetamine concentrations in urine samples containing high amphetamine levels, warranting clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. Of 12,062 routine samples screened positive for amphetamines, 86% were confirmed positive (≥ 200 μg/L) for amphetamine, 2.1% for methamphetamine, and 4.0% for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Of the 259 methamphetamine-positive samples, 98% contained amphetamine concentrations above the reporting limit, consistent with the metabolic conversion of methamphetamine to amphetamine in the body. However, in most (69%) of these samples, the methamphetamine concentration was only < 2% of the amphetamine level, suggesting methamphetamine was not the primary drug taken. Chiral analysis of selected samples showed that after use of illicit street amphetamine with a racemic content of the l- and d-enantiomers, a similar l/d proportion was observed for methamphetamine. Similarly, in samples from patients receiving d-amphetamine-based ADHD medication, low d-methamphetamine levels were detected, even though the pharmaceutical products contained no methamphetamine. This observation, together with the parallel l/d-enantiomer distributions, supports amphetamine N-methylation as a trace, albeit quantitatively insignificant, metabolic pathway in humans. From both a clinical and forensic perspective, a low urinary methamphetamine concentration of less than a few percent of the amphetamine level therefore does not warrant further clinical evaluation for suspected polydrug use. The present findings further demonstrate that chiral analysis of both amphetamine and methamphetamine is an effective approach for distinguishing between illicit and therapeutic sources in positive screening drug tests for the amphetamines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信