炎症性肠病生物治疗剂量递增和剂量递减的频率和有效性:ENEIDA的RAINBOW-IBD研究

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Cristina Rubín de Célix,Elena Ricart,M Dolores Martín-Arranz,Ruth de Francisco,Francisco Javier García-Alonso,Francisco Mesonero,Fernando Gomollón,Luisa de Castro,Laura Ramos,Santiago García-López,Lara Arias,Miriam Mañosa,Eva Iglesias,Xavier Calvet,Carles Suria Bolufer,María José Casanova,José Lázaro Pérez-Calle,Antonio Giordano,Mónica Sierra-Ausín,Isabel Vera,Mercè Navarro-Llavat,Rufo Lorente,Marta Piqueras,Montserrat Rivero,Jordi Guardiola,María Esteve,Ana Fuentes Coronel,Iago Rodríguez-Lago,Ángel Ponferrada-Díaz,Yolanda Ber,Carlos Tardillo,Lucía Márquez,Daniel Carpio,Carlos Taxonera,Fernando Bermejo,David Busquets,Blau Camps,Ana Gutiérrez,Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre,Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta,Ignacio Marín-Jiménez,José M Huguet,Luis Ignacio Fernández-Salazar,Jordina Jaó,Cristina Rodríguez-Gutiérrez,Carlos Martínez-Flores,Luis Bujanda,Alfredo J Lucendo,Eva Sesé,Pilar Robledo Andrés,Daniel Ginard,Pablo Vega,Joan Riera,Ramón Pajares,Manuel Van Domselaar,Pedro Almela,Teresa Martínez Pérez,Carmen Muñoz-Villafranca,Pilar Varela,Federico Argüelles-Arias,Pilar Nos,Guillermo Alcaín,Luis Hernández,Hipólito Fernández,Fernando Muñoz,Pau Gilabert,Victor Manuel Navas-López,Patricia Ramírez de la Piscina,Lidia Buendía Sánchez,Jesús Legido Gil,Gemma Valldosera,Rosa Ana Muñoz,Santiago Frago,Eugeni Domènech,María Chaparro,Javier P Gisbert
{"title":"炎症性肠病生物治疗剂量递增和剂量递减的频率和有效性:ENEIDA的RAINBOW-IBD研究","authors":"Cristina Rubín de Célix,Elena Ricart,M Dolores Martín-Arranz,Ruth de Francisco,Francisco Javier García-Alonso,Francisco Mesonero,Fernando Gomollón,Luisa de Castro,Laura Ramos,Santiago García-López,Lara Arias,Miriam Mañosa,Eva Iglesias,Xavier Calvet,Carles Suria Bolufer,María José Casanova,José Lázaro Pérez-Calle,Antonio Giordano,Mónica Sierra-Ausín,Isabel Vera,Mercè Navarro-Llavat,Rufo Lorente,Marta Piqueras,Montserrat Rivero,Jordi Guardiola,María Esteve,Ana Fuentes Coronel,Iago Rodríguez-Lago,Ángel Ponferrada-Díaz,Yolanda Ber,Carlos Tardillo,Lucía Márquez,Daniel Carpio,Carlos Taxonera,Fernando Bermejo,David Busquets,Blau Camps,Ana Gutiérrez,Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre,Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta,Ignacio Marín-Jiménez,José M Huguet,Luis Ignacio Fernández-Salazar,Jordina Jaó,Cristina Rodríguez-Gutiérrez,Carlos Martínez-Flores,Luis Bujanda,Alfredo J Lucendo,Eva Sesé,Pilar Robledo Andrés,Daniel Ginard,Pablo Vega,Joan Riera,Ramón Pajares,Manuel Van Domselaar,Pedro Almela,Teresa Martínez Pérez,Carmen Muñoz-Villafranca,Pilar Varela,Federico Argüelles-Arias,Pilar Nos,Guillermo Alcaín,Luis Hernández,Hipólito Fernández,Fernando Muñoz,Pau Gilabert,Victor Manuel Navas-López,Patricia Ramírez de la Piscina,Lidia Buendía Sánchez,Jesús Legido Gil,Gemma Valldosera,Rosa Ana Muñoz,Santiago Frago,Eugeni Domènech,María Chaparro,Javier P Gisbert","doi":"10.1111/apt.70312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nReal-world data on dose escalation/de-escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nTo assess the frequency, effectiveness and durability of escalation/de-escalation of infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD, and to identify factors influencing relapse and drug discontinuation and re-escalation efficacy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included patients from the ENEIDA registry of GETECCU who were exposed to biologics and analysed escalations/de-escalations. We assessed the impact of variables on durability, drug discontinuation and relapse after escalation/de-escalation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 19,720 patients on biologics, 5096 (26%) underwent dose escalation. Frequency of escalation per patient-year was 5% (infliximab), 7% (adalimumab), 7% (golimumab), 10% (vedolizumab) and 12% (ustekinumab). Clinical remission was recaptured in 32%-49% of patients. Durability of escalation (24 months) ranged from 66% to 88%. Drug discontinuation was associated with previous biologic exposure and disease duration (infliximab), monotherapy (adalimumab) and ulcerative colitis (ustekinumab). There were 669 de-escalations. The frequency per patient-year was 6%, 9%, 5%, 6% and 3% for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Maintenance of remission after de-escalation was observed in 75%-100%. Durability of de-escalation (12 months) was 82%-90%. Factors associated with relapse were biologic exposure (infliximab) and age at de-escalation (adalimumab). Re-escalation benefited most patients.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn the long term, some patients with IBD need biologic escalation, which frequently recaptures durable clinical remission. De-escalation is feasible in some patients. Re-escalation is generally effective after relapse.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and Effectiveness of Dose Escalation and De-Escalation of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The RAINBOW-IBD Study of ENEIDA.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Rubín de Célix,Elena Ricart,M Dolores Martín-Arranz,Ruth de Francisco,Francisco Javier García-Alonso,Francisco Mesonero,Fernando Gomollón,Luisa de Castro,Laura Ramos,Santiago García-López,Lara Arias,Miriam Mañosa,Eva Iglesias,Xavier Calvet,Carles Suria Bolufer,María José Casanova,José Lázaro Pérez-Calle,Antonio Giordano,Mónica Sierra-Ausín,Isabel Vera,Mercè Navarro-Llavat,Rufo Lorente,Marta Piqueras,Montserrat Rivero,Jordi Guardiola,María Esteve,Ana Fuentes Coronel,Iago Rodríguez-Lago,Ángel Ponferrada-Díaz,Yolanda Ber,Carlos Tardillo,Lucía Márquez,Daniel Carpio,Carlos Taxonera,Fernando Bermejo,David Busquets,Blau Camps,Ana Gutiérrez,Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre,Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta,Ignacio Marín-Jiménez,José M Huguet,Luis Ignacio Fernández-Salazar,Jordina Jaó,Cristina Rodríguez-Gutiérrez,Carlos Martínez-Flores,Luis Bujanda,Alfredo J Lucendo,Eva Sesé,Pilar Robledo Andrés,Daniel Ginard,Pablo Vega,Joan Riera,Ramón Pajares,Manuel Van Domselaar,Pedro Almela,Teresa Martínez Pérez,Carmen Muñoz-Villafranca,Pilar Varela,Federico Argüelles-Arias,Pilar Nos,Guillermo Alcaín,Luis Hernández,Hipólito Fernández,Fernando Muñoz,Pau Gilabert,Victor Manuel Navas-López,Patricia Ramírez de la Piscina,Lidia Buendía Sánchez,Jesús Legido Gil,Gemma Valldosera,Rosa Ana Muñoz,Santiago Frago,Eugeni Domènech,María Chaparro,Javier P Gisbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.70312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nReal-world data on dose escalation/de-escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce.\\r\\n\\r\\nAIMS\\r\\nTo assess the frequency, effectiveness and durability of escalation/de-escalation of infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD, and to identify factors influencing relapse and drug discontinuation and re-escalation efficacy.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe included patients from the ENEIDA registry of GETECCU who were exposed to biologics and analysed escalations/de-escalations. We assessed the impact of variables on durability, drug discontinuation and relapse after escalation/de-escalation.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 19,720 patients on biologics, 5096 (26%) underwent dose escalation. Frequency of escalation per patient-year was 5% (infliximab), 7% (adalimumab), 7% (golimumab), 10% (vedolizumab) and 12% (ustekinumab). Clinical remission was recaptured in 32%-49% of patients. Durability of escalation (24 months) ranged from 66% to 88%. Drug discontinuation was associated with previous biologic exposure and disease duration (infliximab), monotherapy (adalimumab) and ulcerative colitis (ustekinumab). There were 669 de-escalations. The frequency per patient-year was 6%, 9%, 5%, 6% and 3% for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Maintenance of remission after de-escalation was observed in 75%-100%. Durability of de-escalation (12 months) was 82%-90%. Factors associated with relapse were biologic exposure (infliximab) and age at de-escalation (adalimumab). Re-escalation benefited most patients.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIn the long term, some patients with IBD need biologic escalation, which frequently recaptures durable clinical remission. De-escalation is feasible in some patients. Re-escalation is generally effective after relapse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70312\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现实世界中关于炎症性肠病(IBD)剂量递增/递减的数据很少。目的评估IBD患者英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、戈利单抗、维多利单抗和乌斯特金单抗升级/降级的频率、有效性和持久性,并确定影响复发、停药和再升级疗效的因素。方法我们纳入了GETECCU ENEIDA登记的暴露于生物制剂的患者,并分析了升级/降级。我们评估了变量对持续性、药物停药和升级/降级后复发的影响。结果在19,720例使用生物制剂的患者中,5096例(26%)进行了剂量递增。每患者年的升级频率分别为5%(英夫利昔单抗)、7%(阿达木单抗)、7%(戈利单抗)、10%(维多单抗)和12%(乌斯特金单抗)。32%-49%的患者再次获得临床缓解。持续时间(24个月)从66%到88%不等。停药与先前的生物暴露和疾病持续时间(英夫利昔单抗)、单药治疗(阿达木单抗)和溃疡性结肠炎(ustekinumab)有关。有669次降级。英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、戈利单抗、维多单抗和乌斯特金单抗的频率分别为6%、9%、5%、6%和3%。降级后缓解的维持率为75%-100%。缓解的持久性(12个月)为82%-90%。与复发相关的因素是生物暴露(英夫利昔单抗)和降级时的年龄(阿达木单抗)。再升级使大多数患者受益。结论从长期来看,一些IBD患者需要生物升级,这往往会重新获得持久的临床缓解。在一些患者中,降级是可行的。复发后再升级通常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency and Effectiveness of Dose Escalation and De-Escalation of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The RAINBOW-IBD Study of ENEIDA.
BACKGROUND Real-world data on dose escalation/de-escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce. AIMS To assess the frequency, effectiveness and durability of escalation/de-escalation of infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD, and to identify factors influencing relapse and drug discontinuation and re-escalation efficacy. METHODS We included patients from the ENEIDA registry of GETECCU who were exposed to biologics and analysed escalations/de-escalations. We assessed the impact of variables on durability, drug discontinuation and relapse after escalation/de-escalation. RESULTS Of 19,720 patients on biologics, 5096 (26%) underwent dose escalation. Frequency of escalation per patient-year was 5% (infliximab), 7% (adalimumab), 7% (golimumab), 10% (vedolizumab) and 12% (ustekinumab). Clinical remission was recaptured in 32%-49% of patients. Durability of escalation (24 months) ranged from 66% to 88%. Drug discontinuation was associated with previous biologic exposure and disease duration (infliximab), monotherapy (adalimumab) and ulcerative colitis (ustekinumab). There were 669 de-escalations. The frequency per patient-year was 6%, 9%, 5%, 6% and 3% for infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Maintenance of remission after de-escalation was observed in 75%-100%. Durability of de-escalation (12 months) was 82%-90%. Factors associated with relapse were biologic exposure (infliximab) and age at de-escalation (adalimumab). Re-escalation benefited most patients. CONCLUSIONS In the long term, some patients with IBD need biologic escalation, which frequently recaptures durable clinical remission. De-escalation is feasible in some patients. Re-escalation is generally effective after relapse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信