{"title":"影响髂静脉支架对侧髂静脉口重叠程度的因素。","authors":"Liang-Peng Wang, Zi-Hui Chen, Min-Yong Peng, Chao Li, Wen Huang","doi":"10.1177/02683555251365132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors influencing the extent of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage by stents extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS).MethodsThis retrospective study included 150 patients with IVCS who underwent unilateral stent placement between September 2018 and October 2020. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, venography showing ≥50% iliac vein narrowing, and exclusion of thrombosis or external compression. Patients received either a braided Wallstent or a laser-cut Smart Control stent. Three-dimensional rotational venography was used in all cases, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed in selected patients to guide stent sizing and placement. Postoperative imaging was used to measure stent protrusion into the IVC, iliac vein-IVC angulation, and the percentage of contralateral vein orifice obstruction. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with orifice coverage.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that stent protrusion length, lateral angulation between the iliac vein and IVC, and stent type were significantly associated with orifice coverage (all <i>p</i> < .001). Age, sex, stent diameter, and anteroposterior angulation were not significant predictors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that stent protrusion length was the strongest predictor (β = 0.595, <i>p</i> < .001), followed by stent type (β = 0.249, <i>p</i> < .001) and lateral angulation (β = -0.242, <i>p</i> = .002), with the model explaining 76.6% of the variation in orifice coverage.ConclusionThe degree of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage in IVCS is primarily determined by the stent's protrusion length into the IVC, the lateral angulation of the affected iliac vein relative to the IVC, and the mechanical design of the stent. These findings highlight the importance of individualized stent selection and precise deployment to minimize contralateral venous obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251365132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the extent of contralateral iliac vein orifice overlap by iliac vein stents.\",\"authors\":\"Liang-Peng Wang, Zi-Hui Chen, Min-Yong Peng, Chao Li, Wen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251365132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors influencing the extent of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage by stents extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS).MethodsThis retrospective study included 150 patients with IVCS who underwent unilateral stent placement between September 2018 and October 2020. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, venography showing ≥50% iliac vein narrowing, and exclusion of thrombosis or external compression. Patients received either a braided Wallstent or a laser-cut Smart Control stent. Three-dimensional rotational venography was used in all cases, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed in selected patients to guide stent sizing and placement. Postoperative imaging was used to measure stent protrusion into the IVC, iliac vein-IVC angulation, and the percentage of contralateral vein orifice obstruction. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with orifice coverage.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that stent protrusion length, lateral angulation between the iliac vein and IVC, and stent type were significantly associated with orifice coverage (all <i>p</i> < .001). Age, sex, stent diameter, and anteroposterior angulation were not significant predictors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that stent protrusion length was the strongest predictor (β = 0.595, <i>p</i> < .001), followed by stent type (β = 0.249, <i>p</i> < .001) and lateral angulation (β = -0.242, <i>p</i> = .002), with the model explaining 76.6% of the variation in orifice coverage.ConclusionThe degree of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage in IVCS is primarily determined by the stent's protrusion length into the IVC, the lateral angulation of the affected iliac vein relative to the IVC, and the mechanical design of the stent. These findings highlight the importance of individualized stent selection and precise deployment to minimize contralateral venous obstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251365132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨影响髂静脉压迫综合征(IVCS)患者置入下腔静脉(IVC)支架对侧髂静脉口覆盖范围的因素。方法本回顾性研究纳入了2018年9月至2020年10月期间接受单侧支架置入术的150例IVCS患者。诊断基于临床症状,静脉造影显示≥50%髂静脉狭窄,排除血栓形成或外部压迫。患者要么接受编织支架,要么接受激光切割的智能控制支架。所有病例均采用三维旋转静脉造影,并在选定的患者中进行血管内超声(IVUS)以指导支架的尺寸和放置。术后影像学测量支架伸入下腔静脉、髂静脉-下腔静脉成角、对侧静脉口梗阻百分比。进行了单因素和多因素回归分析,以确定与孔口覆盖率相关的因素。结果单因素分析显示,支架突出长度、髂静脉与下腔静脉之间的侧成角、支架类型与孔口覆盖率显著相关(均p < 0.001)。年龄、性别、支架直径和前后成角不是显著的预测因素。多因素分析证实,支架突出长度是最强的预测因子(β = 0.595, p < .001),其次是支架类型(β = 0.249, p < .001)和侧角度(β = -0.242, p = .002),该模型解释了76.6%的孔口覆盖率变化。结论IVCS对侧髂静脉孔口覆盖程度主要由支架伸入IVC的长度、受影响髂静脉相对于IVC的侧角度以及支架的机械设计决定。这些发现强调了个体化支架选择和精确部署的重要性,以尽量减少对侧静脉阻塞。
Factors influencing the extent of contralateral iliac vein orifice overlap by iliac vein stents.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors influencing the extent of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage by stents extending into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in patients with iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS).MethodsThis retrospective study included 150 patients with IVCS who underwent unilateral stent placement between September 2018 and October 2020. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, venography showing ≥50% iliac vein narrowing, and exclusion of thrombosis or external compression. Patients received either a braided Wallstent or a laser-cut Smart Control stent. Three-dimensional rotational venography was used in all cases, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed in selected patients to guide stent sizing and placement. Postoperative imaging was used to measure stent protrusion into the IVC, iliac vein-IVC angulation, and the percentage of contralateral vein orifice obstruction. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with orifice coverage.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that stent protrusion length, lateral angulation between the iliac vein and IVC, and stent type were significantly associated with orifice coverage (all p < .001). Age, sex, stent diameter, and anteroposterior angulation were not significant predictors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that stent protrusion length was the strongest predictor (β = 0.595, p < .001), followed by stent type (β = 0.249, p < .001) and lateral angulation (β = -0.242, p = .002), with the model explaining 76.6% of the variation in orifice coverage.ConclusionThe degree of contralateral iliac vein orifice coverage in IVCS is primarily determined by the stent's protrusion length into the IVC, the lateral angulation of the affected iliac vein relative to the IVC, and the mechanical design of the stent. These findings highlight the importance of individualized stent selection and precise deployment to minimize contralateral venous obstruction.