Stephen B Lo, Nicole A Arrato, Carolyn J Presley, Heather L McGinty, Michael W Otto, Barbara L Andersen
{"title":"肺癌呼吸困难的认知行为治疗:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Stephen B Lo, Nicole A Arrato, Carolyn J Presley, Heather L McGinty, Michael W Otto, Barbara L Andersen","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-580OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Dyspnea (breathlessness) commonly impacts patients with lung cancer, worsening depression, anxiety, quality of life, and functioning. Current treatments are limited. <b>Objectives:</b> To test the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of \"Take a Breath\" (TAB), a novel cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized controlled trial compared TAB with standard of care (SOC) in patients with lung cancer reporting at least moderate dyspnea (<i>N</i> = 45). TAB consisted of five 1-hour weekly individual sessions employing exposure-based interventions paired with pulse oximetry biofeedback, psychoeducation, and behavioral skills (e.g., pursed lip breathing). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 measured acceptability. Accrual, treatment retention, and homework completion measured feasibility. Primary outcomes were the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related functioning) and Cancer Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related effort, discomfort, and anxiety). Secondary outcomes included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), health-related quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form), and functional status (Karnofsky performance status). Measurements occurred at baseline, midtreatment (3 wk), post-treatment (6 wk), and 1-month follow-up. Robust mixed-effects modeling tested group × time interactions. <b>Results:</b> TAB was at least \"mostly satisfactory\" for 75% of participants. The accrual was 25.6%, with 60% completing all sessions and an 88.7% homework completion rate. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed greater improvements in TAB than SOC for dyspnea-related functioning (Cohen's <i>d = </i>0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and anxiety (Cohen's <i>d = </i>0.87; <i>P</i> < 0.01) at post-treatment and follow-up. TAB outperformed SOC in improving depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, sedentary time, and performance status over time (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> TAB yielded symptom, psychological, and functional improvements, establishing its readiness for further testing as the first comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea and related sequelae. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05304793).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1579-1591"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen B Lo, Nicole A Arrato, Carolyn J Presley, Heather L McGinty, Michael W Otto, Barbara L Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-580OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Dyspnea (breathlessness) commonly impacts patients with lung cancer, worsening depression, anxiety, quality of life, and functioning. Current treatments are limited. <b>Objectives:</b> To test the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of \\\"Take a Breath\\\" (TAB), a novel cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized controlled trial compared TAB with standard of care (SOC) in patients with lung cancer reporting at least moderate dyspnea (<i>N</i> = 45). TAB consisted of five 1-hour weekly individual sessions employing exposure-based interventions paired with pulse oximetry biofeedback, psychoeducation, and behavioral skills (e.g., pursed lip breathing). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 measured acceptability. Accrual, treatment retention, and homework completion measured feasibility. Primary outcomes were the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related functioning) and Cancer Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related effort, discomfort, and anxiety). Secondary outcomes included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), health-related quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form), and functional status (Karnofsky performance status). Measurements occurred at baseline, midtreatment (3 wk), post-treatment (6 wk), and 1-month follow-up. Robust mixed-effects modeling tested group × time interactions. <b>Results:</b> TAB was at least \\\"mostly satisfactory\\\" for 75% of participants. The accrual was 25.6%, with 60% completing all sessions and an 88.7% homework completion rate. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed greater improvements in TAB than SOC for dyspnea-related functioning (Cohen's <i>d = </i>0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and anxiety (Cohen's <i>d = </i>0.87; <i>P</i> < 0.01) at post-treatment and follow-up. TAB outperformed SOC in improving depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, sedentary time, and performance status over time (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> TAB yielded symptom, psychological, and functional improvements, establishing its readiness for further testing as the first comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea and related sequelae. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05304793).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1579-1591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-580OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-580OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
理由:呼吸困难(呼吸困难)通常影响肺癌患者,加重抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和功能。目前的治疗方法有限。目的:验证“Take a Breath”(TAB)这一治疗呼吸困难的认知行为疗法的可接受性、可行性及初步疗效。方法:一项随机对照试验比较TAB和标准护理(SOC)对报告至少中度呼吸困难的肺癌患者(N=45)的影响。TAB包括5个每周一小时的单独疗程,采用基于暴露的干预措施,辅以脉搏血氧仪生物反馈、心理教育和行为技巧(例如,抿嘴呼吸)。鲁棒混合效应建模测试组x时间相互作用。测量:客户满意度问卷-8测量可接受性。应计额、治疗保留和作业完成衡量可行性。主要结局是ATS呼吸困难量表(呼吸困难相关功能)和癌症呼吸困难量表(呼吸困难相关努力、不适和焦虑)。次要结局包括抑郁(PHQ-9)、健康相关生活质量(SF-12)、身体活动(IPAQ-SF)和功能状态(KPS)。测量发生在基线、治疗中期(3周)、治疗后(6周)和1个月的随访。结果:75%的受试者TAB≥“基本满意”。应计率为25.6%,其中60%完成了所有课程,作业完成率为88.7%。意向治疗分析显示,TAB比SOC对呼吸困难相关功能(Cohen’s d=0.82, p=0.03)和焦虑(Cohen’s d=0.87, p)的改善更大。结论:TAB改善了症状、心理和功能,为进一步测试奠定了基础,作为呼吸困难及相关后遗症的第一种综合认知行为治疗。临床试验注册可在www.Clinicaltrials: gov, ID: NCT05304793。
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Breathlessness in Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rationale: Dyspnea (breathlessness) commonly impacts patients with lung cancer, worsening depression, anxiety, quality of life, and functioning. Current treatments are limited. Objectives: To test the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of "Take a Breath" (TAB), a novel cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea. Methods: A randomized controlled trial compared TAB with standard of care (SOC) in patients with lung cancer reporting at least moderate dyspnea (N = 45). TAB consisted of five 1-hour weekly individual sessions employing exposure-based interventions paired with pulse oximetry biofeedback, psychoeducation, and behavioral skills (e.g., pursed lip breathing). The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 measured acceptability. Accrual, treatment retention, and homework completion measured feasibility. Primary outcomes were the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related functioning) and Cancer Dyspnea Scale (dyspnea-related effort, discomfort, and anxiety). Secondary outcomes included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), health-related quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form), and functional status (Karnofsky performance status). Measurements occurred at baseline, midtreatment (3 wk), post-treatment (6 wk), and 1-month follow-up. Robust mixed-effects modeling tested group × time interactions. Results: TAB was at least "mostly satisfactory" for 75% of participants. The accrual was 25.6%, with 60% completing all sessions and an 88.7% homework completion rate. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed greater improvements in TAB than SOC for dyspnea-related functioning (Cohen's d = 0.82; P = 0.03) and anxiety (Cohen's d = 0.87; P < 0.01) at post-treatment and follow-up. TAB outperformed SOC in improving depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, sedentary time, and performance status over time (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: TAB yielded symptom, psychological, and functional improvements, establishing its readiness for further testing as the first comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment for dyspnea and related sequelae. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05304793).