乌干达坎帕拉市屠宰场工人对废物管理的知识、态度和做法。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S517421
John Paul Sserubula, Pius Jemba, Robert Twinamatsiko
{"title":"乌干达坎帕拉市屠宰场工人对废物管理的知识、态度和做法。","authors":"John Paul Sserubula, Pius Jemba, Robert Twinamatsiko","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S517421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effective management of abattoir waste is crucial for environmental protection and public health. The existing poor waste management and related effects can be caused by insufficient knowledge and bad attitudes of the stakeholders involved in abattoir operations. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of abattoir workers regarding waste management in the Wambizzi and Kalerwe abattoirs in Kampala, Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method cross-sectional design utilising qualitative and quantitative methods. The data collection involved questionnaires among 250 workers, 2 observational checklists, 12 key informant interviewees (KIIs), and 8 focus group discussion groups (FGDs). Study participants for quantitative research were recruited using a stratified random sampling technique and data analysed descriptively while purposive sampling was used for KIIs and FGDs and data analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that 71.6% of workers had good knowledge of abattoir waste management, although gaps in waste sorting were identified. Additionally, 71.2% of workers had positive attitudes towards waste management. However, challenges, such as inadequate infrastructure, poor abattoir design, and inconsistent waste collection, are prevalent. Despite these challenges, the workers demonstrated good practices, with 50.4% exhibiting effective waste management. From qualitative findings, existence of internal rules and regulations on waste management with penalties and punishments was also responsible for abattoir workers' practices towards abattoir waste management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>This study highlights the need for improved waste sorting knowledge, enhanced infrastructure, and logistical support since there was a disconnect between survey results and actual practices. Future research should explore the impact of long-term benefits of infrastructure improvements on waste management efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both knowledge and practical challenges in achieving sustainable waste management in abattoirs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2517-2527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers Towards Waste Management in Slaughterhouses in Kampala City, Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"John Paul Sserubula, Pius Jemba, Robert Twinamatsiko\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S517421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effective management of abattoir waste is crucial for environmental protection and public health. The existing poor waste management and related effects can be caused by insufficient knowledge and bad attitudes of the stakeholders involved in abattoir operations. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of abattoir workers regarding waste management in the Wambizzi and Kalerwe abattoirs in Kampala, Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method cross-sectional design utilising qualitative and quantitative methods. The data collection involved questionnaires among 250 workers, 2 observational checklists, 12 key informant interviewees (KIIs), and 8 focus group discussion groups (FGDs). Study participants for quantitative research were recruited using a stratified random sampling technique and data analysed descriptively while purposive sampling was used for KIIs and FGDs and data analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that 71.6% of workers had good knowledge of abattoir waste management, although gaps in waste sorting were identified. Additionally, 71.2% of workers had positive attitudes towards waste management. However, challenges, such as inadequate infrastructure, poor abattoir design, and inconsistent waste collection, are prevalent. Despite these challenges, the workers demonstrated good practices, with 50.4% exhibiting effective waste management. From qualitative findings, existence of internal rules and regulations on waste management with penalties and punishments was also responsible for abattoir workers' practices towards abattoir waste management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>This study highlights the need for improved waste sorting knowledge, enhanced infrastructure, and logistical support since there was a disconnect between survey results and actual practices. Future research should explore the impact of long-term benefits of infrastructure improvements on waste management efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both knowledge and practical challenges in achieving sustainable waste management in abattoirs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2517-2527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S517421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S517421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效管理屠宰场废物对环境保护和公众健康至关重要。现有的废物管理不善和相关影响可能是由于参与屠宰场业务的利益攸关方知识不足和态度不良造成的。本研究评估了乌干达坎帕拉的Wambizzi和Kalerwe屠宰场的屠宰场工人对废物管理的知识、态度和做法。方法:采用定性与定量相结合的混合截面设计法。数据收集包括对250名工人进行问卷调查,2份观察清单,12名关键信息受访者(kii)和8个焦点小组讨论组(fgd)。定量研究的研究参与者采用分层随机抽样技术,并对数据进行描述性分析,而kii和fgd采用目的抽样,并对数据进行主题分析。结果:研究发现,71.6%的工人对屠宰场废物管理有良好的了解,尽管发现了废物分类方面的差距。此外,71.2%的工人对废物管理持积极态度。然而,诸如基础设施不足、屠宰场设计不良和废物收集不一致等挑战仍然普遍存在。尽管面临这些挑战,工人们表现出良好的做法,50.4%的工人表现出有效的废物管理。从定性调查结果来看,存在关于废物管理的内部规则和条例以及惩罚措施也是屠宰场工人对屠宰场废物管理的做法的原因。结论和建议:由于调查结果与实际做法之间存在脱节,本研究强调需要改进废物分类知识、加强基础设施和后勤支持。未来的研究应探讨基础设施改善对废物管理效率的长期效益的影响。这些发现强调了在实现屠宰场可持续废物管理方面解决知识和实际挑战的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers Towards Waste Management in Slaughterhouses in Kampala City, Uganda.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers Towards Waste Management in Slaughterhouses in Kampala City, Uganda.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers Towards Waste Management in Slaughterhouses in Kampala City, Uganda.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Abattoir Workers Towards Waste Management in Slaughterhouses in Kampala City, Uganda.

Background: The effective management of abattoir waste is crucial for environmental protection and public health. The existing poor waste management and related effects can be caused by insufficient knowledge and bad attitudes of the stakeholders involved in abattoir operations. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of abattoir workers regarding waste management in the Wambizzi and Kalerwe abattoirs in Kampala, Uganda.

Methods: A mixed method cross-sectional design utilising qualitative and quantitative methods. The data collection involved questionnaires among 250 workers, 2 observational checklists, 12 key informant interviewees (KIIs), and 8 focus group discussion groups (FGDs). Study participants for quantitative research were recruited using a stratified random sampling technique and data analysed descriptively while purposive sampling was used for KIIs and FGDs and data analysed thematically.

Results: The study found that 71.6% of workers had good knowledge of abattoir waste management, although gaps in waste sorting were identified. Additionally, 71.2% of workers had positive attitudes towards waste management. However, challenges, such as inadequate infrastructure, poor abattoir design, and inconsistent waste collection, are prevalent. Despite these challenges, the workers demonstrated good practices, with 50.4% exhibiting effective waste management. From qualitative findings, existence of internal rules and regulations on waste management with penalties and punishments was also responsible for abattoir workers' practices towards abattoir waste management.

Conclusion and recommendations: This study highlights the need for improved waste sorting knowledge, enhanced infrastructure, and logistical support since there was a disconnect between survey results and actual practices. Future research should explore the impact of long-term benefits of infrastructure improvements on waste management efficiency. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both knowledge and practical challenges in achieving sustainable waste management in abattoirs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信