一项调查研究:让基本患者支持人员作为患者伙伴参与研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S512398
Christine Skubisz, Shayna DeRosa, Carly R Pacanowski
{"title":"一项调查研究:让基本患者支持人员作为患者伙伴参与研究。","authors":"Christine Skubisz, Shayna DeRosa, Carly R Pacanowski","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S512398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient engagement in research is a collaborative interaction between patients and researchers throughout the entire research process. Healthcare workers provide care for others, but are the patients themselves in areas of workplace safety and mental health. Essential patient support personnel working on the front line of healthcare are particularly vulnerable but have an underrepresented voice in the research conducted about their health and work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To explore this topic, a survey study of essential patient support personnel (N=42), guided by the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction, measured attitudes about engagement, behavioral intentions, and past engagement behavior. Skills and constraints, predictors of behavioral intentions for engagement in the model, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that essential patient support personnel had positive attitudes and positive behavioral intentions to engage in research, yet only two participants had engaged in research in the past. Participants reported the most positive behavioral intentions to contribute at the preparation stage of research. Overwhelmingly, participants reported that the most important skill essential patient support personnel bring to a research team is their first-hand experience. Significant constraints to engagement included a lack of time, insufficient compensation, and job burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efforts to bolster patient engagement in research should focus on increasing the skills necessary for study execution (eg, study design and data analysis) and removing constraints to contribution (eg, providing appropriate monetary compensation, being mindful of time and heavy work schedules).</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2529-2537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging Essential Patient Support Personnel in Research as Patient Partners: A Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Skubisz, Shayna DeRosa, Carly R Pacanowski\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S512398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient engagement in research is a collaborative interaction between patients and researchers throughout the entire research process. Healthcare workers provide care for others, but are the patients themselves in areas of workplace safety and mental health. Essential patient support personnel working on the front line of healthcare are particularly vulnerable but have an underrepresented voice in the research conducted about their health and work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To explore this topic, a survey study of essential patient support personnel (N=42), guided by the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction, measured attitudes about engagement, behavioral intentions, and past engagement behavior. Skills and constraints, predictors of behavioral intentions for engagement in the model, were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that essential patient support personnel had positive attitudes and positive behavioral intentions to engage in research, yet only two participants had engaged in research in the past. Participants reported the most positive behavioral intentions to contribute at the preparation stage of research. Overwhelmingly, participants reported that the most important skill essential patient support personnel bring to a research team is their first-hand experience. Significant constraints to engagement included a lack of time, insufficient compensation, and job burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efforts to bolster patient engagement in research should focus on increasing the skills necessary for study execution (eg, study design and data analysis) and removing constraints to contribution (eg, providing appropriate monetary compensation, being mindful of time and heavy work schedules).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2529-2537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S512398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S512398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者参与研究是患者和研究人员在整个研究过程中的协作互动。医护人员为他人提供护理,但在工作场所安全和心理健康方面,他们自己就是病人。在医疗保健第一线工作的基本患者支持人员尤其脆弱,但在对他们的健康和工作进行的研究中,他们的发言权不足。方法:采用行为预测综合模型(Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction)对42名急诊护理人员进行调查研究,测量其敬业态度、行为意向和过去的敬业行为。技能和约束,模型中参与行为意图的预测因素,也被评估。结果:基本患者支持人员对参与研究有积极的态度和积极的行为意向,但只有2名参与者过去参与过研究。在研究的准备阶段,参与者报告了最积极的行为意图。绝大多数参与者报告说,基本病人支持人员给研究团队带来的最重要的技能是他们的第一手经验。影响员工敬业度的主要因素包括缺乏时间、薪酬不足和工作倦怠。结论:加强患者参与研究的努力应侧重于提高研究执行所需的技能(例如,研究设计和数据分析),并消除对贡献的限制(例如,提供适当的货币补偿,注意时间和繁重的工作安排)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Engaging Essential Patient Support Personnel in Research as Patient Partners: A Survey Study.

Engaging Essential Patient Support Personnel in Research as Patient Partners: A Survey Study.

Introduction: Patient engagement in research is a collaborative interaction between patients and researchers throughout the entire research process. Healthcare workers provide care for others, but are the patients themselves in areas of workplace safety and mental health. Essential patient support personnel working on the front line of healthcare are particularly vulnerable but have an underrepresented voice in the research conducted about their health and work.

Methods: To explore this topic, a survey study of essential patient support personnel (N=42), guided by the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction, measured attitudes about engagement, behavioral intentions, and past engagement behavior. Skills and constraints, predictors of behavioral intentions for engagement in the model, were also assessed.

Results: Results showed that essential patient support personnel had positive attitudes and positive behavioral intentions to engage in research, yet only two participants had engaged in research in the past. Participants reported the most positive behavioral intentions to contribute at the preparation stage of research. Overwhelmingly, participants reported that the most important skill essential patient support personnel bring to a research team is their first-hand experience. Significant constraints to engagement included a lack of time, insufficient compensation, and job burnout.

Conclusion: Efforts to bolster patient engagement in research should focus on increasing the skills necessary for study execution (eg, study design and data analysis) and removing constraints to contribution (eg, providing appropriate monetary compensation, being mindful of time and heavy work schedules).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信