知觉负荷引起的分心减少:复制失败。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Robert J Snowden, Nicola S Gray
{"title":"知觉负荷引起的分心减少:复制失败。","authors":"Robert J Snowden, Nicola S Gray","doi":"10.1177/03010066251364203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceptual load theory states that there are limited processing resources, but that these must always be fully employed. It has been used to predict and explain the commonly reported finding that irrelevant distractors influence behaviour when the task has low load (such as processing just one target element) but not when the task has high load (processing many target elements). We attempted to replicate this effect over a series of six experiments that manipulated the location of the distractor, the duration of the display, and different levels of load. We examined both the distracting effects caused by a \"neutral\" distractor, and response-biases (congruence effects) that occur when the distractor is either congruent or incongruent with the target. Strong distraction and congruence effects were found with central distractors and weaker effects were found with peripheral distractors. These effects appeared to be independent of the level of perceptual load in all conditions. Our findings thus do not support the tenants of perceptual load theory and fail to replicate the many findings that do support this theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066251364203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction in distraction due to perceptual load: A failure to replicate.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Snowden, Nicola S Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03010066251364203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Perceptual load theory states that there are limited processing resources, but that these must always be fully employed. It has been used to predict and explain the commonly reported finding that irrelevant distractors influence behaviour when the task has low load (such as processing just one target element) but not when the task has high load (processing many target elements). We attempted to replicate this effect over a series of six experiments that manipulated the location of the distractor, the duration of the display, and different levels of load. We examined both the distracting effects caused by a \\\"neutral\\\" distractor, and response-biases (congruence effects) that occur when the distractor is either congruent or incongruent with the target. Strong distraction and congruence effects were found with central distractors and weaker effects were found with peripheral distractors. These effects appeared to be independent of the level of perceptual load in all conditions. Our findings thus do not support the tenants of perceptual load theory and fail to replicate the many findings that do support this theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3010066251364203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251364203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251364203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知觉负荷理论认为,加工资源是有限的,但必须充分利用。它已被用来预测和解释通常报道的发现,即当任务负荷低(例如只处理一个目标元素)时,不相关的干扰因素会影响行为,而当任务负荷高(处理多个目标元素)时则不会。我们试图通过一系列的六个实验来复制这种效果,这些实验操纵了干扰物的位置,显示的持续时间和不同的负载水平。我们研究了由“中性”分心物引起的分心效应,以及当分心物与目标一致或不一致时发生的反应偏差(一致性效应)。中心干扰物具有较强的分心和一致性效应,而外围干扰物的影响较弱。这些影响似乎与所有条件下的感知负荷水平无关。因此,我们的研究结果不支持感知负荷理论的租户,也无法复制许多支持这一理论的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reduction in distraction due to perceptual load: A failure to replicate.

Perceptual load theory states that there are limited processing resources, but that these must always be fully employed. It has been used to predict and explain the commonly reported finding that irrelevant distractors influence behaviour when the task has low load (such as processing just one target element) but not when the task has high load (processing many target elements). We attempted to replicate this effect over a series of six experiments that manipulated the location of the distractor, the duration of the display, and different levels of load. We examined both the distracting effects caused by a "neutral" distractor, and response-biases (congruence effects) that occur when the distractor is either congruent or incongruent with the target. Strong distraction and congruence effects were found with central distractors and weaker effects were found with peripheral distractors. These effects appeared to be independent of the level of perceptual load in all conditions. Our findings thus do not support the tenants of perceptual load theory and fail to replicate the many findings that do support this theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信