探讨COVID-19大流行对老年人情绪、焦虑和神经认知障碍的影响:性别、地理环境和医疗保健环境考虑因素。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jacquelyn Paquet, Katharine Hibbard, Pamela Brett-MacLean
{"title":"探讨COVID-19大流行对老年人情绪、焦虑和神经认知障碍的影响:性别、地理环境和医疗保健环境考虑因素。","authors":"Jacquelyn Paquet, Katharine Hibbard, Pamela Brett-MacLean","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02969-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults face unique risk factors for psychiatric illness, including comorbid medical concerns, loss, and loneliness. With the older adult population expected to triple in the next two decades, understanding patterns of prevalent psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders is crucial for treatment and policy planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal cohort design examined anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders among older adults in Alberta, utilizing physician billing data from 2017 to 2022. Rates of presentations were compared before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the influence of sex, geographic location (urban, rural) and healthcare setting (outpatient, emergency department, inpatient). Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of these factors on presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alberta's older adults had 1,365,423 presentations for mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders from 2017 to 2022 with outpatient services comprising the majority, increased 28.18% during the pandemic. Anxiety was the most common (45.47%), followed by mood (34.76%) and neurocognitive disorders (18.77%). ANOVA showed no significant differences across pandemic phases for mood, anxiety or neurocognitive disorders. Regression analyses identified sex, geographic locations, and healthcare setting as significant predictors, with healthcare setting having the strongest effect. Interactions between sex, geographic location, and healthcare setting were significant for mood and anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychiatric presentations varied by disorder, influenced by demographic and contextual factors. Healthcare setting was a significant predictor across all disorders. The lack of pandemic-related effects suggests a consistent impact across phases, highlighting the need for ongoing evaluation on the pandemic's long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders in older adults: sex, geographic context, and healthcare setting considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Jacquelyn Paquet, Katharine Hibbard, Pamela Brett-MacLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02969-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults face unique risk factors for psychiatric illness, including comorbid medical concerns, loss, and loneliness. With the older adult population expected to triple in the next two decades, understanding patterns of prevalent psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders is crucial for treatment and policy planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal cohort design examined anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders among older adults in Alberta, utilizing physician billing data from 2017 to 2022. Rates of presentations were compared before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the influence of sex, geographic location (urban, rural) and healthcare setting (outpatient, emergency department, inpatient). Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of these factors on presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alberta's older adults had 1,365,423 presentations for mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders from 2017 to 2022 with outpatient services comprising the majority, increased 28.18% during the pandemic. Anxiety was the most common (45.47%), followed by mood (34.76%) and neurocognitive disorders (18.77%). ANOVA showed no significant differences across pandemic phases for mood, anxiety or neurocognitive disorders. Regression analyses identified sex, geographic locations, and healthcare setting as significant predictors, with healthcare setting having the strongest effect. Interactions between sex, geographic location, and healthcare setting were significant for mood and anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychiatric presentations varied by disorder, influenced by demographic and contextual factors. Healthcare setting was a significant predictor across all disorders. The lack of pandemic-related effects suggests a consistent impact across phases, highlighting the need for ongoing evaluation on the pandemic's long-term effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02969-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02969-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人面临独特的精神疾病风险因素,包括合并症、丧失和孤独。随着老年人口预计将在未来二十年增加两倍,了解包括焦虑、情绪和神经认知障碍在内的流行精神疾病的模式对治疗和政策规划至关重要。方法:该纵向队列设计利用2017年至2022年的医生账单数据,研究了阿尔伯塔省老年人的焦虑、情绪和神经认知障碍。比较了COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后的报告率。该研究评估了性别、地理位置(城市、农村)和医疗环境(门诊、急诊、住院)的影响。采用描述性统计、方差分析和回归分析来评估这些因素对表现的影响。结果:从2017年到2022年,艾伯塔省的老年人有1,365,423例情绪、焦虑和神经认知障碍的表现,门诊服务占大多数,在大流行期间增加了28.18%。最常见的是焦虑(45.47%),其次是情绪(34.76%)和神经认知障碍(18.77%)。方差分析显示,情绪、焦虑或神经认知障碍在不同的流行阶段没有显著差异。回归分析发现,性别、地理位置和医疗环境是重要的预测因素,其中医疗环境的影响最大。性别、地理位置和医疗环境之间的相互作用对情绪和焦虑障碍有显著影响。结论:精神病学表现因障碍而异,受人口统计学和环境因素的影响。医疗环境是所有疾病的重要预测因子。没有出现与大流行有关的影响,这表明各阶段的影响是一致的,突出表明需要对大流行的长期影响进行持续评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders in older adults: sex, geographic context, and healthcare setting considerations.

Introduction: Older adults face unique risk factors for psychiatric illness, including comorbid medical concerns, loss, and loneliness. With the older adult population expected to triple in the next two decades, understanding patterns of prevalent psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders is crucial for treatment and policy planning.

Methods: This longitudinal cohort design examined anxiety, mood, and neurocognitive disorders among older adults in Alberta, utilizing physician billing data from 2017 to 2022. Rates of presentations were compared before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study assessed the influence of sex, geographic location (urban, rural) and healthcare setting (outpatient, emergency department, inpatient). Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of these factors on presentations.

Results: Alberta's older adults had 1,365,423 presentations for mood, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders from 2017 to 2022 with outpatient services comprising the majority, increased 28.18% during the pandemic. Anxiety was the most common (45.47%), followed by mood (34.76%) and neurocognitive disorders (18.77%). ANOVA showed no significant differences across pandemic phases for mood, anxiety or neurocognitive disorders. Regression analyses identified sex, geographic locations, and healthcare setting as significant predictors, with healthcare setting having the strongest effect. Interactions between sex, geographic location, and healthcare setting were significant for mood and anxiety disorders.

Conclusion: Psychiatric presentations varied by disorder, influenced by demographic and contextual factors. Healthcare setting was a significant predictor across all disorders. The lack of pandemic-related effects suggests a consistent impact across phases, highlighting the need for ongoing evaluation on the pandemic's long-term effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信