语言病理学家、课堂教师和特殊教育教师的形态意识和自我效能感。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Semra Selvi-Balo, Buğse Durmuş, Havva Nur Yirtik, Sacide Ebrar Geçay, Batuhan Ökte, Rojda Özalp Bakla, Burcu Akçay
{"title":"语言病理学家、课堂教师和特殊教育教师的形态意识和自我效能感。","authors":"Semra Selvi-Balo, Buğse Durmuş, Havva Nur Yirtik, Sacide Ebrar Geçay, Batuhan Ökte, Rojda Özalp Bakla, Burcu Akçay","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2025.2526203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a component of metalinguistic knowledge, morphological awareness is intricately tied in with literacy skills. Hence, an adequate command of morphological awareness by the professionals providing therapy and education to school-age children is important forchildren's language and literacy skills. The current research aimed to assess and compare the self-efficacy and morphological awareness of speech and language pathologists (SLPs), classroom teachers (CTs), and special education teachers (SETs). A total of 258 individuals participated in the study - SLPs (n = 86), CTs (n = 77) and SETs (n = 95). A four-part survey composed of 30 Likert-type, short-answer, or multiple-choice items was sent to the participants through e-mails or social media. Data were analyzed via descriptive and comparative analysis methods. The findings showed that all the participants' self-efficacy levels were higher than half of all available points, suggesting confidence in their morphological awareness (M = 20.9, SD = 4.23). Furthermore, the results yielded no statistical difference among the three groups' self-efficacy scores. The morphological awareness of the participants was assessed through two tasks, morpheme counting and morpheme selection in nonwords, producing significant differences among the groups. The analyses indicated that the SLPs' morphological awareness was significantly higher than that of the educators (<i>p</i><.05). The results suggest that SLPs and teachers should collaborate to improve children's literacy skills and that all professionals should enhance their morphological awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological awareness and self-efficacy of speech and language pathologists, classroom teachers and special education teachers in Türkiye.\",\"authors\":\"Semra Selvi-Balo, Buğse Durmuş, Havva Nur Yirtik, Sacide Ebrar Geçay, Batuhan Ökte, Rojda Özalp Bakla, Burcu Akçay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699206.2025.2526203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As a component of metalinguistic knowledge, morphological awareness is intricately tied in with literacy skills. Hence, an adequate command of morphological awareness by the professionals providing therapy and education to school-age children is important forchildren's language and literacy skills. The current research aimed to assess and compare the self-efficacy and morphological awareness of speech and language pathologists (SLPs), classroom teachers (CTs), and special education teachers (SETs). A total of 258 individuals participated in the study - SLPs (n = 86), CTs (n = 77) and SETs (n = 95). A four-part survey composed of 30 Likert-type, short-answer, or multiple-choice items was sent to the participants through e-mails or social media. Data were analyzed via descriptive and comparative analysis methods. The findings showed that all the participants' self-efficacy levels were higher than half of all available points, suggesting confidence in their morphological awareness (M = 20.9, SD = 4.23). Furthermore, the results yielded no statistical difference among the three groups' self-efficacy scores. The morphological awareness of the participants was assessed through two tasks, morpheme counting and morpheme selection in nonwords, producing significant differences among the groups. The analyses indicated that the SLPs' morphological awareness was significantly higher than that of the educators (<i>p</i><.05). The results suggest that SLPs and teachers should collaborate to improve children's literacy skills and that all professionals should enhance their morphological awareness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2526203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2526203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为元语言知识的一个组成部分,词形意识与读写技能有着复杂的联系。因此,为学龄儿童提供治疗和教育的专业人员对词形意识的充分掌握对儿童的语言和读写技能至关重要。本研究旨在评估和比较语言病理学家(slp)、课堂教师(CTs)和特殊教育教师(set)的自我效能感和形态意识。共有258人参与了这项研究- slp (n = 86), ct (n = 77)和set (n = 95)。一份由30个李克特式、简答题或多项选择题组成的四部分调查通过电子邮件或社交媒体发送给参与者。采用描述性和比较性分析方法对数据进行分析。结果表明,所有参与者的自我效能水平都高于所有可用点的一半,表明他们对形态意识有信心(M = 20.9, SD = 4.23)。此外,三组的自我效能感得分无统计学差异。通过非词语素计数和语素选择两项任务对被试的词素意识进行了评估,结果显示组间存在显著差异。分析表明,学生的形态意识显著高于教育工作者(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphological awareness and self-efficacy of speech and language pathologists, classroom teachers and special education teachers in Türkiye.

As a component of metalinguistic knowledge, morphological awareness is intricately tied in with literacy skills. Hence, an adequate command of morphological awareness by the professionals providing therapy and education to school-age children is important forchildren's language and literacy skills. The current research aimed to assess and compare the self-efficacy and morphological awareness of speech and language pathologists (SLPs), classroom teachers (CTs), and special education teachers (SETs). A total of 258 individuals participated in the study - SLPs (n = 86), CTs (n = 77) and SETs (n = 95). A four-part survey composed of 30 Likert-type, short-answer, or multiple-choice items was sent to the participants through e-mails or social media. Data were analyzed via descriptive and comparative analysis methods. The findings showed that all the participants' self-efficacy levels were higher than half of all available points, suggesting confidence in their morphological awareness (M = 20.9, SD = 4.23). Furthermore, the results yielded no statistical difference among the three groups' self-efficacy scores. The morphological awareness of the participants was assessed through two tasks, morpheme counting and morpheme selection in nonwords, producing significant differences among the groups. The analyses indicated that the SLPs' morphological awareness was significantly higher than that of the educators (p<.05). The results suggest that SLPs and teachers should collaborate to improve children's literacy skills and that all professionals should enhance their morphological awareness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信