{"title":"一个健康的“侏罗纪公园时刻”：温和的乐观理由。","authors":"Jonathan Beever, Nicolae Morar","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2025.2543098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this short analysis, we argue that while One Health approaches have remained anthropocentric (i.e. morally and practically prioritizing human health), One Health is due for its \"Jurassic Park moment.\" Such a moment would mark a shift in moral priority, balancing human interests against nonhuman interests. Examples of theory and practice in One Health support the potential for such a shift.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"36 1","pages":"2543098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One health's \\\"Jurassic Park moment\\\": tempered reasons for optimism.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Beever, Nicolae Morar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11287462.2025.2543098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this short analysis, we argue that while One Health approaches have remained anthropocentric (i.e. morally and practically prioritizing human health), One Health is due for its \\\"Jurassic Park moment.\\\" Such a moment would mark a shift in moral priority, balancing human interests against nonhuman interests. Examples of theory and practice in One Health support the potential for such a shift.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2543098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2543098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2543098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
One health's "Jurassic Park moment": tempered reasons for optimism.
In this short analysis, we argue that while One Health approaches have remained anthropocentric (i.e. morally and practically prioritizing human health), One Health is due for its "Jurassic Park moment." Such a moment would mark a shift in moral priority, balancing human interests against nonhuman interests. Examples of theory and practice in One Health support the potential for such a shift.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
