成年腰痛手术患者术后康复的结构性障碍和促进因素:范围审查方案

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica J Wong, Jen Rinaldi, Paulo Pereira, Silvano Mior, Lauren Ead, Alanna Veitch, Kent Murnaghan, Pierre Côté
{"title":"成年腰痛手术患者术后康复的结构性障碍和促进因素:范围审查方案","authors":"Jessica J Wong, Jen Rinaldi, Paulo Pereira, Silvano Mior, Lauren Ead, Alanna Veitch, Kent Murnaghan, Pierre Côté","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02919-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to disability and rehabilitation needs globally. A proportion of patients with LBP undergo surgery and require postsurgical rehabilitation to optimize functioning. However, many encounter barriers to accessing rehabilitation due to structurally generated inequities linked to socioeconomic position. Structural barriers to accessing rehabilitation intersect with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity) to perpetuate stigma and marginalization, leading to tremendous consequences. This literature needs to be reviewed to identify key themes and knowledge gaps focused on structural factors to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation. Our objectives are to conduct a scoping review of the literature to (1) systematically map the literature on the experiences with structural barriers and facilitators to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation of adults who were treated with surgery for LBP (including with or without radiculopathy, symptomatic spinal stenosis); (2) investigate whether these experiences differ when grouped by diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geographic region).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a scoping review of the literature based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review guidance and report it according to PRISMA-Scoping Reviews. We will search multiple databases from inception to 2025 for qualitative research exploring experiences with structural barriers or facilitators to rehabilitation access after surgery among adults with LBP. Drawing upon the World Health Organization (WHO) Action on Social Determinants of Health framework, structural factors to accessing rehabilitation will include socioeconomic and political contexts; governance; macroeconomic, social and public policies; and cultural and societal values/norms. Paired reviewers will independently screen articles and extract data. Results will be summarized and grouped by type of LBP and rehabilitation, and by intersections with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, age, ethnicity, disabilities, geographic region). Our interdisciplinary team will engage with an Advisory Committee of knowledge users with lived experience throughout.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Aligned with WHO and EUROSPINE priorities, our scoping review will elucidate the structural barriers and facilitators influencing access to post-surgical rehabilitation for LBP more inclusively. Findings will advance knowledge of structural challenges experienced by adults needing post-surgical rehabilitation, informing rehabilitation and other healthcare strategies to remove barriers and improve functioning globally.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework (OSF) https://osf.io/26h9w.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural barriers and facilitators to accessing postsurgical rehabilitation in adults who were treated with surgery for low back pain: protocol for a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica J Wong, Jen Rinaldi, Paulo Pereira, Silvano Mior, Lauren Ead, Alanna Veitch, Kent Murnaghan, Pierre Côté\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02919-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to disability and rehabilitation needs globally. A proportion of patients with LBP undergo surgery and require postsurgical rehabilitation to optimize functioning. However, many encounter barriers to accessing rehabilitation due to structurally generated inequities linked to socioeconomic position. Structural barriers to accessing rehabilitation intersect with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity) to perpetuate stigma and marginalization, leading to tremendous consequences. This literature needs to be reviewed to identify key themes and knowledge gaps focused on structural factors to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation. Our objectives are to conduct a scoping review of the literature to (1) systematically map the literature on the experiences with structural barriers and facilitators to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation of adults who were treated with surgery for LBP (including with or without radiculopathy, symptomatic spinal stenosis); (2) investigate whether these experiences differ when grouped by diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geographic region).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a scoping review of the literature based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review guidance and report it according to PRISMA-Scoping Reviews. We will search multiple databases from inception to 2025 for qualitative research exploring experiences with structural barriers or facilitators to rehabilitation access after surgery among adults with LBP. Drawing upon the World Health Organization (WHO) Action on Social Determinants of Health framework, structural factors to accessing rehabilitation will include socioeconomic and political contexts; governance; macroeconomic, social and public policies; and cultural and societal values/norms. Paired reviewers will independently screen articles and extract data. Results will be summarized and grouped by type of LBP and rehabilitation, and by intersections with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, age, ethnicity, disabilities, geographic region). Our interdisciplinary team will engage with an Advisory Committee of knowledge users with lived experience throughout.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Aligned with WHO and EUROSPINE priorities, our scoping review will elucidate the structural barriers and facilitators influencing access to post-surgical rehabilitation for LBP more inclusively. Findings will advance knowledge of structural challenges experienced by adults needing post-surgical rehabilitation, informing rehabilitation and other healthcare strategies to remove barriers and improve functioning globally.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework (OSF) https://osf.io/26h9w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02919-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02919-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰痛(LBP)是全球残疾和康复需求的主要贡献者。一部分腰痛患者接受手术,并需要术后康复以优化功能。然而,由于与社会经济地位相关的结构性不平等,许多人在获得康复方面遇到障碍。获得康复的结构性障碍与与多样性有关的因素(例如,性别、种族)交织在一起,使耻辱和边缘化永久化,导致巨大后果。这些文献需要进行审查,以确定关键主题和知识差距,重点关注结构性因素,以获得术后康复。我们的目标是对文献进行范围综述,以:(1)系统地绘制有关结构性障碍和促进因素的经验的文献,这些文献有助于接受LBP手术治疗的成年人(包括伴有或不伴有神经根病、症状性椎管狭窄)的术后康复;(2)调查这些经历是否因多样性相关因素(如性别、种族、地理区域)而不同。方法:我们将根据Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)的范围综述指南对文献进行范围综述,并按照PRISMA-Scoping Reviews进行报告。我们将检索从成立到2025年的多个数据库,以进行定性研究,探索成年LBP患者手术后康复准入的结构性障碍或促进因素。根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)关于健康问题社会决定因素的行动框架,获得康复的结构性因素将包括社会经济和政治背景;治理;宏观经济、社会和公共政策;以及文化和社会价值观/规范。配对审稿人将独立筛选文章并提取数据。结果将根据LBP和康复类型以及与多样性相关因素(如性别、年龄、种族、残疾、地理区域)的交叉点进行汇总和分组。我们的跨学科团队将与一个由具有实际经验的知识使用者组成的咨询委员会合作。讨论:根据WHO和EUROSPINE的优先事项,我们的范围审查将阐明影响LBP术后康复的结构性障碍和促进因素。研究结果将促进对需要术后康复的成年人所经历的结构性挑战的认识,为康复和其他医疗保健策略提供信息,以消除障碍并改善全球功能。系统评审注册:开放科学框架(OSF) https://osf.io/26h9w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural barriers and facilitators to accessing postsurgical rehabilitation in adults who were treated with surgery for low back pain: protocol for a scoping review.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to disability and rehabilitation needs globally. A proportion of patients with LBP undergo surgery and require postsurgical rehabilitation to optimize functioning. However, many encounter barriers to accessing rehabilitation due to structurally generated inequities linked to socioeconomic position. Structural barriers to accessing rehabilitation intersect with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity) to perpetuate stigma and marginalization, leading to tremendous consequences. This literature needs to be reviewed to identify key themes and knowledge gaps focused on structural factors to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation. Our objectives are to conduct a scoping review of the literature to (1) systematically map the literature on the experiences with structural barriers and facilitators to accessing post-surgical rehabilitation of adults who were treated with surgery for LBP (including with or without radiculopathy, symptomatic spinal stenosis); (2) investigate whether these experiences differ when grouped by diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, ethnicity, geographic region).

Methods: We will conduct a scoping review of the literature based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review guidance and report it according to PRISMA-Scoping Reviews. We will search multiple databases from inception to 2025 for qualitative research exploring experiences with structural barriers or facilitators to rehabilitation access after surgery among adults with LBP. Drawing upon the World Health Organization (WHO) Action on Social Determinants of Health framework, structural factors to accessing rehabilitation will include socioeconomic and political contexts; governance; macroeconomic, social and public policies; and cultural and societal values/norms. Paired reviewers will independently screen articles and extract data. Results will be summarized and grouped by type of LBP and rehabilitation, and by intersections with diversity-related factors (e.g., gender, age, ethnicity, disabilities, geographic region). Our interdisciplinary team will engage with an Advisory Committee of knowledge users with lived experience throughout.

Discussion: Aligned with WHO and EUROSPINE priorities, our scoping review will elucidate the structural barriers and facilitators influencing access to post-surgical rehabilitation for LBP more inclusively. Findings will advance knowledge of structural challenges experienced by adults needing post-surgical rehabilitation, informing rehabilitation and other healthcare strategies to remove barriers and improve functioning globally.

Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) https://osf.io/26h9w.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信