光生物调节对多种健康结果的影响:随机临床试验的综述

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yejun Son, Hyeri Lee, Seungyeong Yu, Hyeon Jin Kim, Jaeyu Park, Selin Woo, Hayeon Lee, Guillaume Fond, Laurent Boyer, Masoud Rahmati, Lee Smith, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Elena Dragioti, Jiseung Kang, Tae Kim, Dong Keon Yon
{"title":"光生物调节对多种健康结果的影响:随机临床试验的综述","authors":"Yejun Son, Hyeri Lee, Seungyeong Yu, Hyeon Jin Kim, Jaeyu Park, Selin Woo, Hayeon Lee, Guillaume Fond, Laurent Boyer, Masoud Rahmati, Lee Smith, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Elena Dragioti, Jiseung Kang, Tae Kim, Dong Keon Yon","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02902-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive therapy increasingly used for pain, inflammation, and tissue repair, yet a comprehensive synthesis of its effectiveness across multiple health outcomes remains lacking. Herein, we aimed to systematically assess the clinical effects and strength of evidence for PBM across a wide range of health outcomes using data from existing meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of RCTs, searching five databases up to December 8, 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2 and evaluated certainty of evidence using a modified GRADE framework. Pooled effect sizes were recalculated as equivalent standardized mean differences (eSMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023495502).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 meta-analyses encompassing 204 RCTs and over 9000 participants were included, covering 35 health endpoints across 15 disease conditions. PBM showed significant effects for 12 outcomes, with moderate certainty of evidence supporting improvements in burning mouth syndrome (pain reduction, eSMD - 0.92 [95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.46]), knee osteoarthritis (disability, 0.65 [0.14 to 1.15]), fibromyalgia (fatigue, 1.25 [0.63 to 1.87]), androgenetic alopecia (hair density, 1.32 [1.00 to 1.63]), and cognitive function (0.49 [0.14 to 0.84]). Most other outcomes exhibited low or very low certainty due to heterogeneity or small-study effects. P-curve and funnel plot analyses indicated evidential value for several outcomes, though potential publication bias was identified in some.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBM appeared beneficial for some health conditions, such as the strongest support for fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis-related disability, and cognitive impairment. However, given the overall low-to-moderate certainty of evidence for most endpoints, further high-quality trials and standardization of PBM protocols are warranted before widespread clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of photobiomodulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yejun Son, Hyeri Lee, Seungyeong Yu, Hyeon Jin Kim, Jaeyu Park, Selin Woo, Hayeon Lee, Guillaume Fond, Laurent Boyer, Masoud Rahmati, Lee Smith, Guillermo F López Sánchez, Elena Dragioti, Jiseung Kang, Tae Kim, Dong Keon Yon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02902-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive therapy increasingly used for pain, inflammation, and tissue repair, yet a comprehensive synthesis of its effectiveness across multiple health outcomes remains lacking. Herein, we aimed to systematically assess the clinical effects and strength of evidence for PBM across a wide range of health outcomes using data from existing meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of RCTs, searching five databases up to December 8, 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2 and evaluated certainty of evidence using a modified GRADE framework. Pooled effect sizes were recalculated as equivalent standardized mean differences (eSMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023495502).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 meta-analyses encompassing 204 RCTs and over 9000 participants were included, covering 35 health endpoints across 15 disease conditions. PBM showed significant effects for 12 outcomes, with moderate certainty of evidence supporting improvements in burning mouth syndrome (pain reduction, eSMD - 0.92 [95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.46]), knee osteoarthritis (disability, 0.65 [0.14 to 1.15]), fibromyalgia (fatigue, 1.25 [0.63 to 1.87]), androgenetic alopecia (hair density, 1.32 [1.00 to 1.63]), and cognitive function (0.49 [0.14 to 0.84]). Most other outcomes exhibited low or very low certainty due to heterogeneity or small-study effects. P-curve and funnel plot analyses indicated evidential value for several outcomes, though potential publication bias was identified in some.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBM appeared beneficial for some health conditions, such as the strongest support for fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis-related disability, and cognitive impairment. However, given the overall low-to-moderate certainty of evidence for most endpoints, further high-quality trials and standardization of PBM protocols are warranted before widespread clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02902-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02902-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:光生物调节(PBM)是一种非侵入性治疗方法,越来越多地用于疼痛、炎症和组织修复,但对其在多种健康结果中的有效性的综合研究仍然缺乏。在此,我们的目的是利用现有随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析数据,系统地评估PBM在广泛健康结局中的临床效果和证据强度。方法:我们对随机对照试验的meta分析进行了总括性综述,检索了截至2023年12月8日的5个数据库。两名审稿人使用AMSTAR 2独立评估方法学质量,并使用改进的GRADE框架评估证据的确定性。合并效应量重新计算为等效标准化平均差(eSMD), 95%置信区间(CI)。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023495502)。结果:共纳入了15项荟萃分析,包括204项随机对照试验和9000多名参与者,涵盖了15种疾病条件下的35个健康终点。PBM在12个结果中显示出显著的效果,有中等确定性的证据支持灼口综合征(疼痛减轻,eSMD - 0.92 [95% CI - 1.38至- 0.46])、膝骨关节炎(残疾,0.65[0.14至1.15])、纤维肌痛(疲劳,1.25[0.63至1.87])、雄性激素性脱发(头发密度,1.32[1.00至1.63])和认知功能(0.49[0.14至0.84])的改善。由于异质性或小研究效应,大多数其他结果表现出低或极低的确定性。p曲线和漏斗图分析显示了一些结果的证据价值,尽管在一些结果中发现了潜在的发表偏倚。结论:PBM似乎对某些健康状况有益,例如对纤维肌痛、骨关节炎相关残疾和认知障碍的最强支持。然而,考虑到大多数终点的证据总体上是低到中等的确定性,在广泛的临床应用之前,需要进一步的高质量试验和PBM方案的标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of photobiomodulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials.

Background: Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive therapy increasingly used for pain, inflammation, and tissue repair, yet a comprehensive synthesis of its effectiveness across multiple health outcomes remains lacking. Herein, we aimed to systematically assess the clinical effects and strength of evidence for PBM across a wide range of health outcomes using data from existing meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of RCTs, searching five databases up to December 8, 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2 and evaluated certainty of evidence using a modified GRADE framework. Pooled effect sizes were recalculated as equivalent standardized mean differences (eSMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023495502).

Results: A total of 15 meta-analyses encompassing 204 RCTs and over 9000 participants were included, covering 35 health endpoints across 15 disease conditions. PBM showed significant effects for 12 outcomes, with moderate certainty of evidence supporting improvements in burning mouth syndrome (pain reduction, eSMD - 0.92 [95% CI - 1.38 to - 0.46]), knee osteoarthritis (disability, 0.65 [0.14 to 1.15]), fibromyalgia (fatigue, 1.25 [0.63 to 1.87]), androgenetic alopecia (hair density, 1.32 [1.00 to 1.63]), and cognitive function (0.49 [0.14 to 0.84]). Most other outcomes exhibited low or very low certainty due to heterogeneity or small-study effects. P-curve and funnel plot analyses indicated evidential value for several outcomes, though potential publication bias was identified in some.

Conclusions: PBM appeared beneficial for some health conditions, such as the strongest support for fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis-related disability, and cognitive impairment. However, given the overall low-to-moderate certainty of evidence for most endpoints, further high-quality trials and standardization of PBM protocols are warranted before widespread clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信