性功能是在脊髓损伤或疾病个体中最常被调查的性行为方面-一项系统综述。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jasmin L. Mahler, Judith J. W. van Beek, Jens Wöllner, Jörg Krebs, Jürgen Pannek
{"title":"性功能是在脊髓损伤或疾病个体中最常被调查的性行为方面-一项系统综述。","authors":"Jasmin L. Mahler, Judith J. W. van Beek, Jens Wöllner, Jörg Krebs, Jürgen Pannek","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01111-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic review. To create an overview of standardized assessments to evaluate sexuality after SCI/D in a systematic literature review. Furthermore, we explored the various dimensions of sexuality assessed by these tools and analyzed sex and gender differences. In a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023416855), we reviewed published assessments of sexuality in individuals with SCI/D with a focus on differences between women and men. The comprehensive search was conducted in PUBMED, Medline, CINAHL and psychINFO in March 2023. The extracted publications were grouped and analyzed according to their objectives. A total of 264 papers were included in the analysis and divided into three categories: “physiological aspects of sexuality”, “psychological aspects of sexuality”, and “sexual adjustment”. Most assessments of sexuality after SCI/D concern physiological aspects (n = 176, 66.7%). Fewer studies focus on psychological aspects (n = 49, 18.6%), and sexual adjustment (n = 39, 14.8%) is the least investigated topic. More research has been published on men’s compared to women’s sexuality (n = 195, 73.9% versus n = 125, 47.3%). In men, the most frequently used standardized assessment is the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF). In women, the equivalent to the IIEF, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), is most frequently used. Most assessments focus primarily on sexual function in men. New assessments are needed to address other aspects of sexuality as well. Furthermore, more research on female sexuality is needed.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":"63 10","pages":"523-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual function is the most commonly investigated aspect of sexuality in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease – a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin L. Mahler, Judith J. W. van Beek, Jens Wöllner, Jörg Krebs, Jürgen Pannek\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41393-025-01111-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systematic review. To create an overview of standardized assessments to evaluate sexuality after SCI/D in a systematic literature review. Furthermore, we explored the various dimensions of sexuality assessed by these tools and analyzed sex and gender differences. In a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023416855), we reviewed published assessments of sexuality in individuals with SCI/D with a focus on differences between women and men. The comprehensive search was conducted in PUBMED, Medline, CINAHL and psychINFO in March 2023. The extracted publications were grouped and analyzed according to their objectives. A total of 264 papers were included in the analysis and divided into three categories: “physiological aspects of sexuality”, “psychological aspects of sexuality”, and “sexual adjustment”. Most assessments of sexuality after SCI/D concern physiological aspects (n = 176, 66.7%). Fewer studies focus on psychological aspects (n = 49, 18.6%), and sexual adjustment (n = 39, 14.8%) is the least investigated topic. More research has been published on men’s compared to women’s sexuality (n = 195, 73.9% versus n = 125, 47.3%). In men, the most frequently used standardized assessment is the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF). In women, the equivalent to the IIEF, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), is most frequently used. Most assessments focus primarily on sexual function in men. New assessments are needed to address other aspects of sexuality as well. Furthermore, more research on female sexuality is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spinal cord\",\"volume\":\"63 10\",\"pages\":\"523-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spinal cord\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-025-01111-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-025-01111-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:系统评价。目的:在系统的文献综述中建立一个评估SCI/D后性行为的标准化评估的概述。此外,我们探索了这些工具评估的性行为的各个维度,并分析了性别和性别差异。方法:在一项系统综述(PROSPERO CRD42023416855)中,我们回顾了已发表的SCI/D患者性行为评估,重点关注女性和男性之间的差异。于2023年3月在PUBMED、Medline、CINAHL和psychINFO进行综合检索。将提取的出版物按其目的进行分组和分析。结果:共纳入论文264篇,分为“性生理方面”、“性心理方面”和“性调适”三类。大多数脊髓损伤/D后的性行为评估涉及生理方面(n = 176, 66.7%)。较少的研究关注心理方面(n = 49, 18.6%),性调整(n = 39, 14.8%)是最少被调查的主题。与女性的性取向相比,男性的性取向研究更多(n = 195,73.9%对n = 125,47.3%)。对于男性,最常用的标准化评估是国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)。在女性中,最常用的是相当于IIEF的女性性功能指数(FSFI)。结论:大多数评估主要关注男性的性功能。还需要对性的其他方面进行新的评估。此外,还需要对女性性行为进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sexual function is the most commonly investigated aspect of sexuality in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease – a systematic review

Sexual function is the most commonly investigated aspect of sexuality in individuals with spinal cord injury or disease – a systematic review
Systematic review. To create an overview of standardized assessments to evaluate sexuality after SCI/D in a systematic literature review. Furthermore, we explored the various dimensions of sexuality assessed by these tools and analyzed sex and gender differences. In a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023416855), we reviewed published assessments of sexuality in individuals with SCI/D with a focus on differences between women and men. The comprehensive search was conducted in PUBMED, Medline, CINAHL and psychINFO in March 2023. The extracted publications were grouped and analyzed according to their objectives. A total of 264 papers were included in the analysis and divided into three categories: “physiological aspects of sexuality”, “psychological aspects of sexuality”, and “sexual adjustment”. Most assessments of sexuality after SCI/D concern physiological aspects (n = 176, 66.7%). Fewer studies focus on psychological aspects (n = 49, 18.6%), and sexual adjustment (n = 39, 14.8%) is the least investigated topic. More research has been published on men’s compared to women’s sexuality (n = 195, 73.9% versus n = 125, 47.3%). In men, the most frequently used standardized assessment is the International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF). In women, the equivalent to the IIEF, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), is most frequently used. Most assessments focus primarily on sexual function in men. New assessments are needed to address other aspects of sexuality as well. Furthermore, more research on female sexuality is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信