多学科辅助干预与常规物理治疗康复减少膝关节置换术患者运动恐惧症的比较分析:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Hung Tzu-Han, Liu Mei-Chun, Kuo Ya-Wen, Lee Jiann-Der
{"title":"多学科辅助干预与常规物理治疗康复减少膝关节置换术患者运动恐惧症的比较分析:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hung Tzu-Han, Liu Mei-Chun, Kuo Ya-Wen, Lee Jiann-Der","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00899-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent disease that affects 24-31.8% of patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR); it impedes their rehabilitation and increases their risk of complications. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care intervention with that of conventional physical therapy in mitigating kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42022366356). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two Chinese databases (the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Airiti Library) and four English databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase) were searched from their inception up to January 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on multidisciplinary intervention for kinesiophobia following TKR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs comprising 648 individuals (327 in the experimental group and 321 in the control group) were included in the analysis. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations revealed moderate evidence quality and strong recommendations for kinesiophobia, pain, and knee joint functional scales. Meta-analysis revealed that multidisciplinary care intervention significantly outperformed conventional physical therapy in terms of reducing kinesiophobia (P < 0.01), with this effect persisting for up to 6 months after the intervention. The overall effect size (standardized mean difference = -2.57, 95% confidence interval [-3.71, -1.44], P < 0.00001) was large, and no risk of publication bias was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary care intervention reduces kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis following TKR. It also reduces their pain scores and promotes early postoperative ambulation. Two studies of the seven included RCTs had small sample sizes (fewer than 100 individuals); this may have affected the robustness of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hung Tzu-Han, Liu Mei-Chun, Kuo Ya-Wen, Lee Jiann-Der\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00899-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent disease that affects 24-31.8% of patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR); it impedes their rehabilitation and increases their risk of complications. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care intervention with that of conventional physical therapy in mitigating kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42022366356). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two Chinese databases (the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Airiti Library) and four English databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase) were searched from their inception up to January 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on multidisciplinary intervention for kinesiophobia following TKR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs comprising 648 individuals (327 in the experimental group and 321 in the control group) were included in the analysis. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations revealed moderate evidence quality and strong recommendations for kinesiophobia, pain, and knee joint functional scales. Meta-analysis revealed that multidisciplinary care intervention significantly outperformed conventional physical therapy in terms of reducing kinesiophobia (P < 0.01), with this effect persisting for up to 6 months after the intervention. The overall effect size (standardized mean difference = -2.57, 95% confidence interval [-3.71, -1.44], P < 0.00001) was large, and no risk of publication bias was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary care intervention reduces kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis following TKR. It also reduces their pain scores and promotes early postoperative ambulation. Two studies of the seven included RCTs had small sample sizes (fewer than 100 individuals); this may have affected the robustness of the findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00899-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00899-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝关节骨关节炎是一种非常普遍的疾病,在接受全膝关节置换术(TKR)的患者中占24-31.8%;它阻碍了他们的康复,并增加了他们出现并发症的风险。本系统综述的目的是比较多学科护理干预与传统物理治疗在减轻膝关节骨性关节炎患者关节置换术中的运动恐惧症方面的有效性。方法:本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(注册号:。CRD42022366356)。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,检索了两个中文数据库(国家论文和学位论文数字图书馆和Airiti图书馆)和四个英文数据库(CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和Embase),从其建立到2023年1月,检索了TKR后运动恐惧症多学科干预的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:共纳入7项rct,共648例(实验组327例,对照组321例)。推荐、评估、发展和评估的分级显示,证据质量中等,强烈推荐运动恐惧症、疼痛和膝关节功能量表。荟萃分析显示,多学科护理干预在减少运动恐惧症方面明显优于常规物理治疗(P)。结论:多学科护理干预可减少膝关节骨性关节炎患者TKR后的运动恐惧症。它还可以减少疼痛评分,促进术后早期活动。在纳入的7项随机对照试验中,有2项研究样本量较小(少于100人);这可能影响了研究结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Analysis of Multidisciplinary Complementary Intervention Versus Routine Physiotherapy Rehabilitation to Reduce Kinesiophobia in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent disease that affects 24-31.8% of patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR); it impedes their rehabilitation and increases their risk of complications. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care intervention with that of conventional physical therapy in mitigating kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing joint replacement.

Methods: This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42022366356). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, two Chinese databases (the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations and Airiti Library) and four English databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase) were searched from their inception up to January 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on multidisciplinary intervention for kinesiophobia following TKR.

Results: Seven RCTs comprising 648 individuals (327 in the experimental group and 321 in the control group) were included in the analysis. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations revealed moderate evidence quality and strong recommendations for kinesiophobia, pain, and knee joint functional scales. Meta-analysis revealed that multidisciplinary care intervention significantly outperformed conventional physical therapy in terms of reducing kinesiophobia (P < 0.01), with this effect persisting for up to 6 months after the intervention. The overall effect size (standardized mean difference = -2.57, 95% confidence interval [-3.71, -1.44], P < 0.00001) was large, and no risk of publication bias was found.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary care intervention reduces kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis following TKR. It also reduces their pain scores and promotes early postoperative ambulation. Two studies of the seven included RCTs had small sample sizes (fewer than 100 individuals); this may have affected the robustness of the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信