土耳其某参考中心风湿病实践中生物类似药处方率数据分析

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hüseyin Kaplan, Gizem Cengiz, Hasan Kara, İsa Cüce, Mehmet Kirnap, Mustafa Çaliş
{"title":"土耳其某参考中心风湿病实践中生物类似药处方率数据分析","authors":"Hüseyin Kaplan, Gizem Cengiz, Hasan Kara, İsa Cüce, Mehmet Kirnap, Mustafa Çaliş","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-14816-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to determine the use/prescription rates of biosimilars (BSs) among patients being treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). This retrospective study included 647 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients' manual and electronic file records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related data were collected. Details of the last prescribed and previously used b/tsDMARDs were noted. The data obtained were compared between groups according to disease type or BSs use. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors associated with prescribing BSs. The mean age of all the patients was 48.1 ± 12.6 years, and 66% of the patients were women. The rate of BS use was 21.2% in all patients, and there was no significant difference in the rate of BS use between the axSpA and RA groups (22.2% vs. 19%; p = 0.337). The total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was 4.3 (1-8.3) years in all patients. Although there was no difference between the patients with axSpA and RA in terms of total treatment duration with the last b/tsDMARD (p = 0.655), the total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was significantly higher in patients with RA than in patients with axSpA (p = 0.001). The use of BSs increased with the number of treatment switches and prescription order(s) of b/tsDMARDs. The BSs prescription rate (39.7%) was highest in drugs prescribed as fifth order or later in patients with prior use of five or more distinct b/tsDMARDs. Female sex, disease duration, and the order of current b/tsDMARD were the most important predictors of preference for BSs over reference drugs. Approximately one in five patients were prescribed BSs among the patients being treated with b/tsDMARDs. The use/prescription rates of BSs were independent of disease type. In patients receiving two or more different b/tsDMARDs, the prescription rates for BSs tended to rise with later treatment line(s) relative to first-line b/tsDMARDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of data on biosimilar prescription rates in rheumatology practice from a reference center in Turkey.\",\"authors\":\"Hüseyin Kaplan, Gizem Cengiz, Hasan Kara, İsa Cüce, Mehmet Kirnap, Mustafa Çaliş\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-14816-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to determine the use/prescription rates of biosimilars (BSs) among patients being treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). This retrospective study included 647 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients' manual and electronic file records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related data were collected. Details of the last prescribed and previously used b/tsDMARDs were noted. The data obtained were compared between groups according to disease type or BSs use. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors associated with prescribing BSs. The mean age of all the patients was 48.1 ± 12.6 years, and 66% of the patients were women. The rate of BS use was 21.2% in all patients, and there was no significant difference in the rate of BS use between the axSpA and RA groups (22.2% vs. 19%; p = 0.337). The total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was 4.3 (1-8.3) years in all patients. Although there was no difference between the patients with axSpA and RA in terms of total treatment duration with the last b/tsDMARD (p = 0.655), the total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was significantly higher in patients with RA than in patients with axSpA (p = 0.001). The use of BSs increased with the number of treatment switches and prescription order(s) of b/tsDMARDs. The BSs prescription rate (39.7%) was highest in drugs prescribed as fifth order or later in patients with prior use of five or more distinct b/tsDMARDs. Female sex, disease duration, and the order of current b/tsDMARD were the most important predictors of preference for BSs over reference drugs. Approximately one in five patients were prescribed BSs among the patients being treated with b/tsDMARDs. The use/prescription rates of BSs were independent of disease type. In patients receiving two or more different b/tsDMARDs, the prescription rates for BSs tended to rise with later treatment line(s) relative to first-line b/tsDMARDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"28853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14816-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14816-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是确定生物仿制药(BSs)在接受生物或靶向合成疾病改善抗风湿药物(b/tsDMARDs)治疗的患者中的使用/处方率。这项回顾性研究包括647例轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)和类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者。回顾患者的手册和电子档案记录,收集人口统计、临床、实验室和治疗相关数据。记录了最后规定和以前使用的b/tsDMARDs的详细信息。根据疾病类型或BSs使用情况,比较两组间数据。采用Logistic回归分析确定与处方BSs相关的潜在预测因素。所有患者的平均年龄为48.1±12.6岁,女性占66%。所有患者的BS使用率为21.2%,axSpA组和RA组之间BS使用率无显著差异(22.2% vs 19%;p = 0.337)。所有患者使用b/tsDMARDs的总持续时间为4.3(1-8.3)年。虽然axSpA患者和RA患者在最后一次b/tsDMARD的总治疗时间方面没有差异(p = 0.655),但RA患者使用所有b/tsDMARD的总持续时间明显高于axSpA患者(p = 0.001)。BSs的使用随着b/tsDMARDs的治疗切换次数和处方顺序的增加而增加。既往使用过5种或5种以上不同b/ tsdmard的患者,第5级及以上处方的BSs处方率最高(39.7%)。女性性别、病程和当前b/tsDMARD顺序是BSs对参考药物偏好的最重要预测因素。在接受b/tsDMARDs治疗的患者中,大约五分之一的患者开了BSs。BSs的使用/处方率与疾病类型无关。在接受两种或多种不同b/ tsdmard治疗的患者中,相对于一线b/ tsdmard, BSs的处方率倾向于随着治疗线的延长而上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of data on biosimilar prescription rates in rheumatology practice from a reference center in Turkey.

We aimed to determine the use/prescription rates of biosimilars (BSs) among patients being treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). This retrospective study included 647 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients' manual and electronic file records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment-related data were collected. Details of the last prescribed and previously used b/tsDMARDs were noted. The data obtained were compared between groups according to disease type or BSs use. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors associated with prescribing BSs. The mean age of all the patients was 48.1 ± 12.6 years, and 66% of the patients were women. The rate of BS use was 21.2% in all patients, and there was no significant difference in the rate of BS use between the axSpA and RA groups (22.2% vs. 19%; p = 0.337). The total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was 4.3 (1-8.3) years in all patients. Although there was no difference between the patients with axSpA and RA in terms of total treatment duration with the last b/tsDMARD (p = 0.655), the total duration of all b/tsDMARDs use was significantly higher in patients with RA than in patients with axSpA (p = 0.001). The use of BSs increased with the number of treatment switches and prescription order(s) of b/tsDMARDs. The BSs prescription rate (39.7%) was highest in drugs prescribed as fifth order or later in patients with prior use of five or more distinct b/tsDMARDs. Female sex, disease duration, and the order of current b/tsDMARD were the most important predictors of preference for BSs over reference drugs. Approximately one in five patients were prescribed BSs among the patients being treated with b/tsDMARDs. The use/prescription rates of BSs were independent of disease type. In patients receiving two or more different b/tsDMARDs, the prescription rates for BSs tended to rise with later treatment line(s) relative to first-line b/tsDMARDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信