免疫检查点抑制剂在肺神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用——系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
OncoTargets and therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OTT.S515194
Rita Carrilho Pichel, Lavinia Benini, Marco Romelli, Sara Gandini, Lorenzo Gervaso, Monica Valente, Maria João De Sousa, Alexandra Araújo, António Araújo, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Nicola Fazio
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂在肺神经内分泌肿瘤中的应用——系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rita Carrilho Pichel, Lavinia Benini, Marco Romelli, Sara Gandini, Lorenzo Gervaso, Monica Valente, Maria João De Sousa, Alexandra Araújo, António Araújo, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Nicola Fazio","doi":"10.2147/OTT.S515194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms of lung origin, including typical and atypical carcinoids (ACs). Therapeutic options for this rare disease are limited in daily clinical practice. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are under clinical investigation. Here, we report a systematic reappraisal about ICIs results in lung NETs. We reviewed articles on observational or interventional studies that reported efficacy data of ICIs in lung NETs. Case reports and studies with insufficient data were excluded from the analysis. We searched the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 2024. Two investigators independently screened the identified records and assessed studies quality. We summarized the results descriptively and in a meta-analysis of ORR according to the type of intervention. The search retrieved 1344 records. After selection, we included 11 studies in the meta-analysis of ORR, with a total of 128 adult patients with lung NET (25% ACs) that were progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy, including treatment with somatostatin analogs. Ten studies were Phase II, and 1 study was phase Ib. The summary ORR was 14.7% (95% CI, 5.8-32.2), 44.4% (27.2-63.1) for ACs. Subgroup analysis by intervention types showed a trend for lower ORR of lung NETs treated with ICI monotherapy (ORR: 2.7%; 0.0-63.7) compared with combinations (p-value: 0.056). The combination of temozolomide plus nivolumab showed the highest ORR (66.7%; 33.3-88.9). The median OS (reported in 2 studies) was not reached. Safety was consistent with historical data of ICIs. Our work suggests that ICIs are a promising treatment for patients with lung NETs, especially ACs, and warrant further investigation in more focused studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19534,"journal":{"name":"OncoTargets and therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"833-843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rita Carrilho Pichel, Lavinia Benini, Marco Romelli, Sara Gandini, Lorenzo Gervaso, Monica Valente, Maria João De Sousa, Alexandra Araújo, António Araújo, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Nicola Fazio\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OTT.S515194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms of lung origin, including typical and atypical carcinoids (ACs). Therapeutic options for this rare disease are limited in daily clinical practice. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are under clinical investigation. Here, we report a systematic reappraisal about ICIs results in lung NETs. We reviewed articles on observational or interventional studies that reported efficacy data of ICIs in lung NETs. Case reports and studies with insufficient data were excluded from the analysis. We searched the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 2024. Two investigators independently screened the identified records and assessed studies quality. We summarized the results descriptively and in a meta-analysis of ORR according to the type of intervention. The search retrieved 1344 records. After selection, we included 11 studies in the meta-analysis of ORR, with a total of 128 adult patients with lung NET (25% ACs) that were progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy, including treatment with somatostatin analogs. Ten studies were Phase II, and 1 study was phase Ib. The summary ORR was 14.7% (95% CI, 5.8-32.2), 44.4% (27.2-63.1) for ACs. Subgroup analysis by intervention types showed a trend for lower ORR of lung NETs treated with ICI monotherapy (ORR: 2.7%; 0.0-63.7) compared with combinations (p-value: 0.056). The combination of temozolomide plus nivolumab showed the highest ORR (66.7%; 33.3-88.9). The median OS (reported in 2 studies) was not reached. Safety was consistent with historical data of ICIs. Our work suggests that ICIs are a promising treatment for patients with lung NETs, especially ACs, and warrant further investigation in more focused studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OncoTargets and therapy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"833-843\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OncoTargets and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S515194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OncoTargets and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S515194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)是肺源性分化良好的神经内分泌肿瘤,包括典型和非典型类癌(ACs)。这种罕见疾病的治疗选择在日常临床实践中是有限的。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)正在临床研究中。在这里,我们报告了对肺NETs中ICIs结果的系统重新评估。我们回顾了一些观察性或介入性研究的文章,这些文章报道了ICIs在肺NETs中的疗效数据。数据不足的病例报告和研究被排除在分析之外。我们检索了截止到2024年5月的Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library电子数据库。两名研究者独立筛选已确定的记录并评估研究质量。我们对结果进行了描述性总结,并根据干预类型对ORR进行了荟萃分析。搜索检索了1344条记录。经过筛选,我们在ORR的荟萃分析中纳入了11项研究,共有128名成年肺NET患者(25% ACs)在接受至少一种全身治疗(包括生长抑素类似物治疗)后进展。10项研究为II期,1项研究为Ib期。ACs的总ORR为14.7% (95% CI, 5.8-32.2), 44.4%(27.2-63.1)。按干预类型进行的亚组分析显示,ICI单药治疗肺NETs的ORR有较低的趋势(ORR: 2.7%;0 ~ 63.7),与组合相比(p值:0.056)。替莫唑胺联合纳武单抗的ORR最高(66.7%;33.3 - -88.9)。中位总生存期(2项研究报告)未达到。安全性与ICIs的历史数据一致。我们的研究表明,对于肺net患者,特别是ACs患者,ICIs是一种很有希望的治疗方法,值得在更有针对性的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms of lung origin, including typical and atypical carcinoids (ACs). Therapeutic options for this rare disease are limited in daily clinical practice. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are under clinical investigation. Here, we report a systematic reappraisal about ICIs results in lung NETs. We reviewed articles on observational or interventional studies that reported efficacy data of ICIs in lung NETs. Case reports and studies with insufficient data were excluded from the analysis. We searched the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 2024. Two investigators independently screened the identified records and assessed studies quality. We summarized the results descriptively and in a meta-analysis of ORR according to the type of intervention. The search retrieved 1344 records. After selection, we included 11 studies in the meta-analysis of ORR, with a total of 128 adult patients with lung NET (25% ACs) that were progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy, including treatment with somatostatin analogs. Ten studies were Phase II, and 1 study was phase Ib. The summary ORR was 14.7% (95% CI, 5.8-32.2), 44.4% (27.2-63.1) for ACs. Subgroup analysis by intervention types showed a trend for lower ORR of lung NETs treated with ICI monotherapy (ORR: 2.7%; 0.0-63.7) compared with combinations (p-value: 0.056). The combination of temozolomide plus nivolumab showed the highest ORR (66.7%; 33.3-88.9). The median OS (reported in 2 studies) was not reached. Safety was consistent with historical data of ICIs. Our work suggests that ICIs are a promising treatment for patients with lung NETs, especially ACs, and warrant further investigation in more focused studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OncoTargets and therapy
OncoTargets and therapy BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-ONCOLOGY
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: OncoTargets and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed journal focusing on molecular aspects of cancer research, that is, the molecular diagnosis of and targeted molecular or precision therapy for all types of cancer. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, basic science, reviews and evaluations, expert opinion and commentary that shed novel insight on a cancer or cancer subtype. Specific topics covered by the journal include: -Novel therapeutic targets and innovative agents -Novel therapeutic regimens for improved benefit and/or decreased side effects -Early stage clinical trials Further considerations when submitting to OncoTargets and Therapy: -Studies containing in vivo animal model data will be considered favorably. -Tissue microarray analyses will not be considered except in cases where they are supported by comprehensive biological studies involving multiple cell lines. -Biomarker association studies will be considered only when validated by comprehensive in vitro data and analysis of human tissue samples. -Studies utilizing publicly available data (e.g. GWAS/TCGA/GEO etc.) should add to the body of knowledge about a specific disease or relevant phenotype and must be validated using the authors’ own data through replication in an independent sample set and functional follow-up. -Bioinformatics studies must be validated using the authors’ own data through replication in an independent sample set and functional follow-up. -Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) studies will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信