{"title":"新生儿高钠血症性脱水:一项减少中度静脉液体使用的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Deniz Yaprak, Belma Saygılı Karagöl","doi":"10.1177/19345798251363457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe rehydration approach for hypernatremic dehydration in newborns is challenging. A new treatment protocol was introduced in the NICU for moderate hypernatremic dehydrated (MHD) newborns to achieve safer and more effective serum sodium (Na+) correction.MethodsA prospective study in a four-level NICU examined term and near term MHD (150-169 mEq/L) newborns. In a novel hypernatremic dehydration treatment protocol, 49 newly diagnosed MHD patients were in group 1, while 54 previously treated control MHD patients were in group 2.Results49 neonates received the novel treatment protocol (group 1), and data from 54 neonates were obtained from hospital records (group 2). Serum Na+ correction rate was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2, with a median serum Na+ level of 0.66 versus 1.05 mEq/L/h, <i>p</i> = 0.001. The proportion of patients who were treated with pure oral rehydration was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (67.3% vs 25.9%, <i>p<0.001</i>). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with use of intravenous rehydration: initial serum Na+ [odds ratio (OR):1.515, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.94, <i>p</i><0.001] and serum uric acid [OR: 1.495, 95% CI 1.092-2.00, <i>p</i> = 0.012] in model 2; belonging to Group 2 [OR: 28.267, 95% CI 10.321-53.69, <i>p</i><0.001]; each additional delay in the day of postnatal admission [OR: 1.381, 95% CI 1.011-1.888, <i>p</i> = 0.043]; and initial serum Na+ [OR: 1.574, 95% CI 1.216-2.037, <i>p</i> = 0.001] in model 4 were significantly associated with intravenous rehydration.ConclusionsOral rehydration therapy offers slower sodium reduction and has a low treatment failure rate in MHD newborns. It can be the primary treatment approach, while intravenous therapy should be considered based on the patient's overall clinical and biochemical status, not just initial sodium levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19345798251363457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newborn hypernatremic dehydration: A prospective study reducing the usage of intravenous liquids in moderate cases.\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Yaprak, Belma Saygılı Karagöl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19345798251363457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesThe rehydration approach for hypernatremic dehydration in newborns is challenging. A new treatment protocol was introduced in the NICU for moderate hypernatremic dehydrated (MHD) newborns to achieve safer and more effective serum sodium (Na+) correction.MethodsA prospective study in a four-level NICU examined term and near term MHD (150-169 mEq/L) newborns. In a novel hypernatremic dehydration treatment protocol, 49 newly diagnosed MHD patients were in group 1, while 54 previously treated control MHD patients were in group 2.Results49 neonates received the novel treatment protocol (group 1), and data from 54 neonates were obtained from hospital records (group 2). Serum Na+ correction rate was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2, with a median serum Na+ level of 0.66 versus 1.05 mEq/L/h, <i>p</i> = 0.001. The proportion of patients who were treated with pure oral rehydration was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (67.3% vs 25.9%, <i>p<0.001</i>). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with use of intravenous rehydration: initial serum Na+ [odds ratio (OR):1.515, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.94, <i>p</i><0.001] and serum uric acid [OR: 1.495, 95% CI 1.092-2.00, <i>p</i> = 0.012] in model 2; belonging to Group 2 [OR: 28.267, 95% CI 10.321-53.69, <i>p</i><0.001]; each additional delay in the day of postnatal admission [OR: 1.381, 95% CI 1.011-1.888, <i>p</i> = 0.043]; and initial serum Na+ [OR: 1.574, 95% CI 1.216-2.037, <i>p</i> = 0.001] in model 4 were significantly associated with intravenous rehydration.ConclusionsOral rehydration therapy offers slower sodium reduction and has a low treatment failure rate in MHD newborns. It can be the primary treatment approach, while intravenous therapy should be considered based on the patient's overall clinical and biochemical status, not just initial sodium levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19345798251363457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251363457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251363457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的新生儿高钠血症性脱水的补液方法具有挑战性。为实现更安全、更有效的血清钠(Na+)校正,NICU为中度高钠血症性脱水(MHD)新生儿引入了一种新的治疗方案。方法在四级新生儿重症监护室进行前瞻性研究,检查足月和近期MHD新生儿(150-169 mEq/L)。在一种新的高钠血症脱水治疗方案中,49名新诊断的MHD患者被分为1组,而54名以前治疗过的MHD患者被分为2组。结果49例新生儿接受了新治疗方案(第一组),54例新生儿的数据来自医院记录(第二组)。1组血清Na+校正率显著低于2组,血清Na+中位值分别为0.66和1.05 mEq/L/h, p = 0.001。1组接受单纯口服补液治疗的患者比例明显高于2组(67.3% vs 25.9%, p)。进行多元回归分析以确定与静脉补液使用相关的因素:模型2中初始血清Na+[比值比(OR):1.515, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.17-1.94, pp = 0.012];属于第二组[OR: 28.267, 95% CI 10.321 ~ 53.69, pp = 0.043];模型4的初始血清Na+ [OR: 1.574, 95% CI 1.216-2.037, p = 0.001]与静脉补液显著相关。结论口服补液治疗对MHD新生儿钠还原较慢,治疗失败率低。它可以作为主要的治疗方法,而静脉注射治疗应根据患者的整体临床和生化状态来考虑,而不仅仅是初始钠水平。
Newborn hypernatremic dehydration: A prospective study reducing the usage of intravenous liquids in moderate cases.
ObjectivesThe rehydration approach for hypernatremic dehydration in newborns is challenging. A new treatment protocol was introduced in the NICU for moderate hypernatremic dehydrated (MHD) newborns to achieve safer and more effective serum sodium (Na+) correction.MethodsA prospective study in a four-level NICU examined term and near term MHD (150-169 mEq/L) newborns. In a novel hypernatremic dehydration treatment protocol, 49 newly diagnosed MHD patients were in group 1, while 54 previously treated control MHD patients were in group 2.Results49 neonates received the novel treatment protocol (group 1), and data from 54 neonates were obtained from hospital records (group 2). Serum Na+ correction rate was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2, with a median serum Na+ level of 0.66 versus 1.05 mEq/L/h, p = 0.001. The proportion of patients who were treated with pure oral rehydration was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (67.3% vs 25.9%, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with use of intravenous rehydration: initial serum Na+ [odds ratio (OR):1.515, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.94, p<0.001] and serum uric acid [OR: 1.495, 95% CI 1.092-2.00, p = 0.012] in model 2; belonging to Group 2 [OR: 28.267, 95% CI 10.321-53.69, p<0.001]; each additional delay in the day of postnatal admission [OR: 1.381, 95% CI 1.011-1.888, p = 0.043]; and initial serum Na+ [OR: 1.574, 95% CI 1.216-2.037, p = 0.001] in model 4 were significantly associated with intravenous rehydration.ConclusionsOral rehydration therapy offers slower sodium reduction and has a low treatment failure rate in MHD newborns. It can be the primary treatment approach, while intravenous therapy should be considered based on the patient's overall clinical and biochemical status, not just initial sodium levels.