迷你精神状态检查与蒙特利尔认知评估相结合预测脑血管高危患者阿尔茨海默病痴呆的发生

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1177/13872877251365629
Kazuo Kitagawa, Hiroshi Yoshizawa, Sono Toi, Kenichi Todo
{"title":"迷你精神状态检查与蒙特利尔认知评估相结合预测脑血管高危患者阿尔茨海默病痴呆的发生","authors":"Kazuo Kitagawa, Hiroshi Yoshizawa, Sono Toi, Kenichi Todo","doi":"10.1177/13872877251365629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundScreening for cognitive function, using tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), is the first step in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the sensitivity of detecting MCI patients who will develop incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in the near future is low.ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the utility of the combination of the MMSE and MoCA in selecting patients at a high risk of incident AD dementia.MethodsIn this post-hoc analysis, we derived data from a Japanese observational registry of patients with vascular risk factors. The primary outcome was incident AD dementia. The accepted cutoff values of an MMSE score of 28 and an MoCA score of 26 for MCI were considered.ResultsAfter excluding those who did not undergo the test, 940 patients were included. During a median follow-up period of 4.6 years, incident AD dementia occurred in 49 patients. Patients diagnosed with MCI with MMSE scores <28 or MoCA scores <26 showed a significantly higher risk of AD dementia than those with normal MMSE or MoCA groups. However, patients who met the MCI criteria in only one test showed a risk similar to that of the normal group. In contrast, patients who met the MCI criteria for MMSE and MoCA scores had a 20.65-fold higher risk than those with normal MMSE and MoCA scores.ConclusionsPatients who met the MCI criteria for both the MMSE and MoCA were highly susceptible to incident AD dementia.Clinical Trial RegistrationUMIN000026671.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"1267-1274"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of combination of Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment to predict incident Alzheimer's disease dementia in patients at high vascular risks.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuo Kitagawa, Hiroshi Yoshizawa, Sono Toi, Kenichi Todo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251365629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundScreening for cognitive function, using tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), is the first step in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the sensitivity of detecting MCI patients who will develop incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in the near future is low.ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the utility of the combination of the MMSE and MoCA in selecting patients at a high risk of incident AD dementia.MethodsIn this post-hoc analysis, we derived data from a Japanese observational registry of patients with vascular risk factors. The primary outcome was incident AD dementia. The accepted cutoff values of an MMSE score of 28 and an MoCA score of 26 for MCI were considered.ResultsAfter excluding those who did not undergo the test, 940 patients were included. During a median follow-up period of 4.6 years, incident AD dementia occurred in 49 patients. Patients diagnosed with MCI with MMSE scores <28 or MoCA scores <26 showed a significantly higher risk of AD dementia than those with normal MMSE or MoCA groups. However, patients who met the MCI criteria in only one test showed a risk similar to that of the normal group. In contrast, patients who met the MCI criteria for MMSE and MoCA scores had a 20.65-fold higher risk than those with normal MMSE and MoCA scores.ConclusionsPatients who met the MCI criteria for both the MMSE and MoCA were highly susceptible to incident AD dementia.Clinical Trial RegistrationUMIN000026671.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1267-1274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251365629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251365629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:认知功能筛查是检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的第一步,使用的测试如迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)。然而,检测MCI患者是否会在不久的将来发展为阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆的敏感性很低。目的本研究旨在阐明MMSE和MoCA结合在选择AD痴呆高危患者中的作用。方法在这项事后分析中,我们从日本的血管危险因素患者的观察性登记中获得数据。主要结局是AD痴呆的发生。考虑MCI的MMSE评分为28分,MoCA评分为26分的可接受临界值。结果在排除未接受检查的患者后,纳入940例患者。在4.6年的中位随访期间,49名患者发生阿尔茨海默氏症。诊断为轻度认知障碍的患者有MMSE评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of combination of Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment to predict incident Alzheimer's disease dementia in patients at high vascular risks.

BackgroundScreening for cognitive function, using tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), is the first step in detecting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the sensitivity of detecting MCI patients who will develop incident Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in the near future is low.ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the utility of the combination of the MMSE and MoCA in selecting patients at a high risk of incident AD dementia.MethodsIn this post-hoc analysis, we derived data from a Japanese observational registry of patients with vascular risk factors. The primary outcome was incident AD dementia. The accepted cutoff values of an MMSE score of 28 and an MoCA score of 26 for MCI were considered.ResultsAfter excluding those who did not undergo the test, 940 patients were included. During a median follow-up period of 4.6 years, incident AD dementia occurred in 49 patients. Patients diagnosed with MCI with MMSE scores <28 or MoCA scores <26 showed a significantly higher risk of AD dementia than those with normal MMSE or MoCA groups. However, patients who met the MCI criteria in only one test showed a risk similar to that of the normal group. In contrast, patients who met the MCI criteria for MMSE and MoCA scores had a 20.65-fold higher risk than those with normal MMSE and MoCA scores.ConclusionsPatients who met the MCI criteria for both the MMSE and MoCA were highly susceptible to incident AD dementia.Clinical Trial RegistrationUMIN000026671.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信