Pierre Kassis, Joe Lebbos, Nabil Chehata, Gebrael Saliba, Elie Haddad, Jacques Choucair, Akel Azzi
{"title":"转移优先事项:美国卫生政策和全球艾滋病毒/艾滋病工作的脆弱未来。","authors":"Pierre Kassis, Joe Lebbos, Nabil Chehata, Gebrael Saliba, Elie Haddad, Jacques Choucair, Akel Azzi","doi":"10.1177/09564624251365146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis narrative review examines the impact of the United States on the war against HIV/AIDS and thus the impact of political ideologies on the financing of the medical sector.DiscussionInitially marked by stigma, particularly in the early years of the epidemic, the US response was transformed with the launch of the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in 2003. PEPFAR has partnered with entities such as the Global Fund and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), retranslating global health governance. Despite this success, the global response remains dependent on the support of the United States. Political changes under the leadership of the conservatives have limited funding. Therefore, political polarization in the US is undermining long-term progress on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.ConclusionBy tracing historical developments and analysing current funding trends, the article highlights the urgent need for sustainable and depoliticized investments in global health systems. Without renewed bipartisan commitment and greater local ownership, the vision of eliminating AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 is seriously threatened.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"9564624251365146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting priorities: U.S. health policy and the fragile future of global HIV/AIDS efforts.\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Kassis, Joe Lebbos, Nabil Chehata, Gebrael Saliba, Elie Haddad, Jacques Choucair, Akel Azzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09564624251365146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis narrative review examines the impact of the United States on the war against HIV/AIDS and thus the impact of political ideologies on the financing of the medical sector.DiscussionInitially marked by stigma, particularly in the early years of the epidemic, the US response was transformed with the launch of the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in 2003. PEPFAR has partnered with entities such as the Global Fund and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), retranslating global health governance. Despite this success, the global response remains dependent on the support of the United States. Political changes under the leadership of the conservatives have limited funding. Therefore, political polarization in the US is undermining long-term progress on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.ConclusionBy tracing historical developments and analysing current funding trends, the article highlights the urgent need for sustainable and depoliticized investments in global health systems. Without renewed bipartisan commitment and greater local ownership, the vision of eliminating AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 is seriously threatened.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9564624251365146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251365146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251365146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shifting priorities: U.S. health policy and the fragile future of global HIV/AIDS efforts.
ObjectiveThis narrative review examines the impact of the United States on the war against HIV/AIDS and thus the impact of political ideologies on the financing of the medical sector.DiscussionInitially marked by stigma, particularly in the early years of the epidemic, the US response was transformed with the launch of the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in 2003. PEPFAR has partnered with entities such as the Global Fund and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), retranslating global health governance. Despite this success, the global response remains dependent on the support of the United States. Political changes under the leadership of the conservatives have limited funding. Therefore, political polarization in the US is undermining long-term progress on HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.ConclusionBy tracing historical developments and analysing current funding trends, the article highlights the urgent need for sustainable and depoliticized investments in global health systems. Without renewed bipartisan commitment and greater local ownership, the vision of eliminating AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 is seriously threatened.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).