跨个体经颅磁刺激的精确网络模型提示治疗靶点和改进潜力。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Wendy Sun, Anne Billot, Jingnan Du, Xiangyu Wei, Rachel A Lemley, Mohammad Daneshzand, Aapo Nummenmaa, Randy L Buckner, Mark C Eldaief
{"title":"跨个体经颅磁刺激的精确网络模型提示治疗靶点和改进潜力。","authors":"Wendy Sun, Anne Billot, Jingnan Du, Xiangyu Wei, Rachel A Lemley, Mohammad Daneshzand, Aapo Nummenmaa, Randy L Buckner, Mark C Eldaief","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Higher-order cognitive and affective functions are supported by large-scale networks in the brain. Dysfunction in different networks is proposed to associate with distinct symptoms in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the specific networks targeted by current clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approaches are unclear. While standard-of-care TMS relies on scalp-based landmarks, recent FDA-approved TMS protocols use individualized functional connectivity with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) to optimize TMS targeting. Leveraging previous work on precision network estimation and modeling of the TMS electric field (E-field), we asked whether various clinical TMS approaches target different functional networks between individuals. Results revealed that modeled homotopic scalp positions (left F3 and right F4) target different networks within and across individuals, and right F4 generally favors a right-lateralized control network. TMS coil positions over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) zone anticorrelated with the sgACC most frequently target a network coupled to the ventral striatum (reward circuitry) but largely miss that network in some individuals. We further illustrate how modeling can be used to retrospectively assess the estimated targets achieved in prior TMS sessions and also used to prospectively provide coil positions that can target distinct closely localized dlPFC network regions with spatial selectivity and maximal E-field intensity. In a final study, precision targeting was found to be feasible in participants with Major Depressive Disorder using data derived from a single low-burden MRI session suggesting the methods are applicable to translational efforts where limiting patient burden and ensuring robustness are critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 11","pages":"e70266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision Network Modeling of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Across Individuals Suggests Therapeutic Targets and Potential for Improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Sun, Anne Billot, Jingnan Du, Xiangyu Wei, Rachel A Lemley, Mohammad Daneshzand, Aapo Nummenmaa, Randy L Buckner, Mark C Eldaief\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Higher-order cognitive and affective functions are supported by large-scale networks in the brain. Dysfunction in different networks is proposed to associate with distinct symptoms in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the specific networks targeted by current clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approaches are unclear. While standard-of-care TMS relies on scalp-based landmarks, recent FDA-approved TMS protocols use individualized functional connectivity with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) to optimize TMS targeting. Leveraging previous work on precision network estimation and modeling of the TMS electric field (E-field), we asked whether various clinical TMS approaches target different functional networks between individuals. Results revealed that modeled homotopic scalp positions (left F3 and right F4) target different networks within and across individuals, and right F4 generally favors a right-lateralized control network. TMS coil positions over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) zone anticorrelated with the sgACC most frequently target a network coupled to the ventral striatum (reward circuitry) but largely miss that network in some individuals. We further illustrate how modeling can be used to retrospectively assess the estimated targets achieved in prior TMS sessions and also used to prospectively provide coil positions that can target distinct closely localized dlPFC network regions with spatial selectivity and maximal E-field intensity. In a final study, precision targeting was found to be feasible in participants with Major Depressive Disorder using data derived from a single low-burden MRI session suggesting the methods are applicable to translational efforts where limiting patient burden and ensuring robustness are critical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 11\",\"pages\":\"e70266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329576/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70266\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高阶认知和情感功能是由大脑中的大规模网络支持的。不同网络的功能障碍被认为与神经精神障碍的不同症状有关。然而,目前临床经颅磁刺激(TMS)方法针对的具体网络尚不清楚。虽然标准的TMS依赖于基于头皮的地标,但最近fda批准的TMS方案使用与亚一般前扣带皮层(sgACC)的个性化功能连接来优化TMS靶向。利用先前关于经颅磁刺激电场(E-field)的精确网络估计和建模的工作,我们询问不同的临床经颅磁刺激方法是否针对个体之间不同的功能网络。结果显示,模拟的同位头皮位置(左F3和右F4)针对个体内部和个体之间的不同网络,而右F4通常倾向于右偏侧的控制网络。TMS线圈位于背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)与sgACC反相关的区域,最常靶向与腹侧纹状体(奖励回路)相连的网络,但在一些个体中很大程度上错过了该网络。我们进一步说明了如何使用建模来回顾性评估在先前的TMS过程中实现的估计目标,并用于前瞻性地提供线圈位置,这些线圈位置可以针对具有空间选择性和最大电场强度的不同紧密定位的dlPFC网络区域。在最后一项研究中,使用来自单次低负荷MRI会话的数据发现,精确靶向在重度抑郁症患者中是可行的,这表明该方法适用于限制患者负担和确保稳健性至关重要的翻译工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Precision Network Modeling of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Across Individuals Suggests Therapeutic Targets and Potential for Improvement.

Higher-order cognitive and affective functions are supported by large-scale networks in the brain. Dysfunction in different networks is proposed to associate with distinct symptoms in neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the specific networks targeted by current clinical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approaches are unclear. While standard-of-care TMS relies on scalp-based landmarks, recent FDA-approved TMS protocols use individualized functional connectivity with the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) to optimize TMS targeting. Leveraging previous work on precision network estimation and modeling of the TMS electric field (E-field), we asked whether various clinical TMS approaches target different functional networks between individuals. Results revealed that modeled homotopic scalp positions (left F3 and right F4) target different networks within and across individuals, and right F4 generally favors a right-lateralized control network. TMS coil positions over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) zone anticorrelated with the sgACC most frequently target a network coupled to the ventral striatum (reward circuitry) but largely miss that network in some individuals. We further illustrate how modeling can be used to retrospectively assess the estimated targets achieved in prior TMS sessions and also used to prospectively provide coil positions that can target distinct closely localized dlPFC network regions with spatial selectivity and maximal E-field intensity. In a final study, precision targeting was found to be feasible in participants with Major Depressive Disorder using data derived from a single low-burden MRI session suggesting the methods are applicable to translational efforts where limiting patient burden and ensuring robustness are critical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信