Maximilian Brandstetter, Andreas Brandstetter, Sabine Kainz-Schultes, Volker R Jacobs, Claudius Fazelnia, Thorsten Fischer, Gerhard Bogner
{"title":"两次剖宫产后的成功分娩试验(TOLA2C):一种分娩方案与胎母结局的分析。","authors":"Maximilian Brandstetter, Andreas Brandstetter, Sabine Kainz-Schultes, Volker R Jacobs, Claudius Fazelnia, Thorsten Fischer, Gerhard Bogner","doi":"10.1055/a-2513-6562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The majority of obstetrical clinics do not offer a trial of labor after two Caesarean sections (TOLA2C) due to concerns about fetal and maternal complications such as uterine rupture or asphyxia. This study aimed to establish a delivery protocol for safely undergoing TOLA2C and analyzed predictors for a successful vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of retrospectively collected data of all pregnant women after two consecutive Caesarean sections was performed at the Obstetrics Department of a tertiary community hospital from January 2013 until December 2022. Those who desired TOLA2C were screened by a senior obstetrician and had to consent to a delivery protocol consisting of five pre- and eight peripartum criteria. Maternal demographic data, indications for previous Caesarean sections and feto-maternal outcome parameters were compared between the successful TOLA2C group and the intrapartum Third-Caesarean section group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 385 women planned a delivery after two consecutive CS. Following the protocol, 358 patients (93.0%) were scheduled as elective repeat CS, while 27 (7.0%) attempted vaginal delivery. In this TOLA2C group, 17 women (63.0%) successfully delivered vaginally. In contrast, ten failed vaginal attempts (37.0%) resulted in nine intrapartum repeat CS and one intrapartum emergency CS. Women with prior vaginal delivery had a higher chance of a successful TOLA2C (p = 0.04). In comparison, women with a previous CS due to the indication of arrested labor had a higher risk for intrapartum repeat CS (p = 0.02). No fetal or maternal death occurred, and no major complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the specified conditions, TOLA2C is safe for mother and fetus, and successful vaginal delivery is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 8","pages":"862-869"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful Trial of Labor After Two Caesarean Sections (TOLA2C): Analysis of a Delivery Protocol with Feto-Maternal Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Brandstetter, Andreas Brandstetter, Sabine Kainz-Schultes, Volker R Jacobs, Claudius Fazelnia, Thorsten Fischer, Gerhard Bogner\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2513-6562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The majority of obstetrical clinics do not offer a trial of labor after two Caesarean sections (TOLA2C) due to concerns about fetal and maternal complications such as uterine rupture or asphyxia. This study aimed to establish a delivery protocol for safely undergoing TOLA2C and analyzed predictors for a successful vaginal delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of retrospectively collected data of all pregnant women after two consecutive Caesarean sections was performed at the Obstetrics Department of a tertiary community hospital from January 2013 until December 2022. Those who desired TOLA2C were screened by a senior obstetrician and had to consent to a delivery protocol consisting of five pre- and eight peripartum criteria. Maternal demographic data, indications for previous Caesarean sections and feto-maternal outcome parameters were compared between the successful TOLA2C group and the intrapartum Third-Caesarean section group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 385 women planned a delivery after two consecutive CS. Following the protocol, 358 patients (93.0%) were scheduled as elective repeat CS, while 27 (7.0%) attempted vaginal delivery. In this TOLA2C group, 17 women (63.0%) successfully delivered vaginally. In contrast, ten failed vaginal attempts (37.0%) resulted in nine intrapartum repeat CS and one intrapartum emergency CS. Women with prior vaginal delivery had a higher chance of a successful TOLA2C (p = 0.04). In comparison, women with a previous CS due to the indication of arrested labor had a higher risk for intrapartum repeat CS (p = 0.02). No fetal or maternal death occurred, and no major complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the specified conditions, TOLA2C is safe for mother and fetus, and successful vaginal delivery is feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\"85 8\",\"pages\":\"862-869\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324859/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2513-6562\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2513-6562","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Successful Trial of Labor After Two Caesarean Sections (TOLA2C): Analysis of a Delivery Protocol with Feto-Maternal Outcome.
Introduction: The majority of obstetrical clinics do not offer a trial of labor after two Caesarean sections (TOLA2C) due to concerns about fetal and maternal complications such as uterine rupture or asphyxia. This study aimed to establish a delivery protocol for safely undergoing TOLA2C and analyzed predictors for a successful vaginal delivery.
Methods: Analysis of retrospectively collected data of all pregnant women after two consecutive Caesarean sections was performed at the Obstetrics Department of a tertiary community hospital from January 2013 until December 2022. Those who desired TOLA2C were screened by a senior obstetrician and had to consent to a delivery protocol consisting of five pre- and eight peripartum criteria. Maternal demographic data, indications for previous Caesarean sections and feto-maternal outcome parameters were compared between the successful TOLA2C group and the intrapartum Third-Caesarean section group.
Results: In the study period, 385 women planned a delivery after two consecutive CS. Following the protocol, 358 patients (93.0%) were scheduled as elective repeat CS, while 27 (7.0%) attempted vaginal delivery. In this TOLA2C group, 17 women (63.0%) successfully delivered vaginally. In contrast, ten failed vaginal attempts (37.0%) resulted in nine intrapartum repeat CS and one intrapartum emergency CS. Women with prior vaginal delivery had a higher chance of a successful TOLA2C (p = 0.04). In comparison, women with a previous CS due to the indication of arrested labor had a higher risk for intrapartum repeat CS (p = 0.02). No fetal or maternal death occurred, and no major complications were observed.
Conclusion: Under the specified conditions, TOLA2C is safe for mother and fetus, and successful vaginal delivery is feasible.
期刊介绍:
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely
gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast
obstetrics and perinatal medicine,
reproductive medicine,
and urogynecology.
GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles.
In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information.
Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.