评估全身性炎症及其预后价值:格拉斯哥预后评分、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率还是其他选择?

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Maurizio Muscaritoli, Alessio Molfino, Simona Orlando, Federica Tambaro
{"title":"评估全身性炎症及其预后价值:格拉斯哥预后评分、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率还是其他选择?","authors":"Maurizio Muscaritoli, Alessio Molfino, Simona Orlando, Federica Tambaro","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Systemic inflammation represents a complex, widespread physiological response initiated by the body in response to various noxious stressors, including infections, trauma, surgery, and chronic diseases. The assessment of systemic inflammation relies on a spectrum of measurable biological indicators.This review evaluates the current evidence on several systemic inflammation biomarkers, including the traditional Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and other emerging indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several simple biomarkers can assess systemic inflammation, each with specific strengths and limitations. The GPS is a well validated index in oncology and is increasingly being used in cardiovascular disease, integrating inflammatory and nutritional status. Blood count-derived ratios such as NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI are widely available and have shown prognostic value across different clinical conditions. Current evidence supports their use in risk stratification and clinical decision-making, though interpretation should always consider the overall clinical picture.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Inflammation biomarkers like GPS, NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI offer accessible tools for risk stratification, with clinical utility varying by context and requiring further standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":"28 5","pages":"367-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing systemic inflammation and its prognostic value: Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or other options?\",\"authors\":\"Maurizio Muscaritoli, Alessio Molfino, Simona Orlando, Federica Tambaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Systemic inflammation represents a complex, widespread physiological response initiated by the body in response to various noxious stressors, including infections, trauma, surgery, and chronic diseases. The assessment of systemic inflammation relies on a spectrum of measurable biological indicators.This review evaluates the current evidence on several systemic inflammation biomarkers, including the traditional Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and other emerging indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several simple biomarkers can assess systemic inflammation, each with specific strengths and limitations. The GPS is a well validated index in oncology and is increasingly being used in cardiovascular disease, integrating inflammatory and nutritional status. Blood count-derived ratios such as NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI are widely available and have shown prognostic value across different clinical conditions. Current evidence supports their use in risk stratification and clinical decision-making, though interpretation should always consider the overall clinical picture.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Inflammation biomarkers like GPS, NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI offer accessible tools for risk stratification, with clinical utility varying by context and requiring further standardization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"367-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:全身性炎症是机体对各种有害应激源(包括感染、创伤、手术和慢性疾病)的复杂、广泛的生理反应。全身性炎症的评估依赖于一系列可测量的生物指标。本综述评估了几种系统性炎症生物标志物的现有证据,包括传统的格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和其他新兴指标,如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)。最近的研究发现:几种简单的生物标志物可以评估全身性炎症,每种标志物都有其特定的优势和局限性。GPS在肿瘤学中是一个很好的验证指标,并且越来越多地用于心血管疾病,整合炎症和营养状况。血液计数衍生的比值如NLR、PLR、LMR、SII和SIRI广泛可用,并在不同的临床条件下显示出预后价值。目前的证据支持它们在风险分层和临床决策中的应用,尽管解释应始终考虑整体临床情况。炎症生物标志物如GPS、NLR、PLR、LMR、SII和SIRI为风险分层提供了方便的工具,临床应用因环境而异,需要进一步标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing systemic inflammation and its prognostic value: Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or other options?

Purpose of review: Systemic inflammation represents a complex, widespread physiological response initiated by the body in response to various noxious stressors, including infections, trauma, surgery, and chronic diseases. The assessment of systemic inflammation relies on a spectrum of measurable biological indicators.This review evaluates the current evidence on several systemic inflammation biomarkers, including the traditional Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and other emerging indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI).

Recent findings: Several simple biomarkers can assess systemic inflammation, each with specific strengths and limitations. The GPS is a well validated index in oncology and is increasingly being used in cardiovascular disease, integrating inflammatory and nutritional status. Blood count-derived ratios such as NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI are widely available and have shown prognostic value across different clinical conditions. Current evidence supports their use in risk stratification and clinical decision-making, though interpretation should always consider the overall clinical picture.

Summary: Inflammation biomarkers like GPS, NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, and SIRI offer accessible tools for risk stratification, with clinical utility varying by context and requiring further standardization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信