困扰体温计检测稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心理困扰的有效性验证:最佳临界值及影响因素

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Xu Tian, Xiaoling Liu, Xiuni Gan, Maria F Jimenez-Herrera, Hongcai Shang, Yi Ren
{"title":"困扰体温计检测稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者心理困扰的有效性验证:最佳临界值及影响因素","authors":"Xu Tian, Xiaoling Liu, Xiuni Gan, Maria F Jimenez-Herrera, Hongcai Shang, Yi Ren","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03864-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at high risk for psychological distress, yet validated screening tools are not routinely used in clinical practice. The Distress Thermometer (DT), originally developed for cancer patients, is a brief screening tool for detecting psychological distress. However, the optimal cut-off in COPD patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to validate the DT for use in stable COPD patients and to explore factors influencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 386 stable COPD patients. Data were collected using sociodemographic questionnaires, the DT, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to determine the predictive metrics of various DT cut-off scores compared to the HADS. Bivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This cross-sectional survey study did not involve experimental interventions and therefore did not require registration in a clinical trials platform. However, the study protocol can be retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C3N79 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DT reported by patients was 3.77, while the mean total HADS score was 29.68. The DT score showed a high correlation with the total HADS score (r = 0.640). An optimal DT cut-off score of ≥ 5 was identified, yielding a Youden index of 0.815, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.40% and 84.14%, respectively. Using this cut-off score, the incidence of significant psychological distress was found to be 32.1%. Risk factors for psychological distress included gender, number of children, educational level, frequency of exercise, GOLD degree, and number of acute exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DT is a valid screening tool for identifying psychological distress among COPD patients. With an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 5, the DT offers high sensitivity and specificity, making it a reliable measure for clinical use. This study also highlights significant factors contributing to psychological distress, emphasizing the importance of integrating routine psychological assessments and care into the routine management of COPD to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Distress Thermometer for detecting psychological distress in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal cut-off score and influencing factors.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Tian, Xiaoling Liu, Xiuni Gan, Maria F Jimenez-Herrera, Hongcai Shang, Yi Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03864-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at high risk for psychological distress, yet validated screening tools are not routinely used in clinical practice. The Distress Thermometer (DT), originally developed for cancer patients, is a brief screening tool for detecting psychological distress. However, the optimal cut-off in COPD patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to validate the DT for use in stable COPD patients and to explore factors influencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 386 stable COPD patients. Data were collected using sociodemographic questionnaires, the DT, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to determine the predictive metrics of various DT cut-off scores compared to the HADS. Bivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This cross-sectional survey study did not involve experimental interventions and therefore did not require registration in a clinical trials platform. However, the study protocol can be retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C3N79 .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DT reported by patients was 3.77, while the mean total HADS score was 29.68. The DT score showed a high correlation with the total HADS score (r = 0.640). An optimal DT cut-off score of ≥ 5 was identified, yielding a Youden index of 0.815, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.40% and 84.14%, respectively. Using this cut-off score, the incidence of significant psychological distress was found to be 32.1%. Risk factors for psychological distress included gender, number of children, educational level, frequency of exercise, GOLD degree, and number of acute exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DT is a valid screening tool for identifying psychological distress among COPD patients. With an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 5, the DT offers high sensitivity and specificity, making it a reliable measure for clinical use. This study also highlights significant factors contributing to psychological distress, emphasizing the importance of integrating routine psychological assessments and care into the routine management of COPD to improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03864-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03864-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者有较高的心理困扰风险,但经过验证的筛查工具并未在临床实践中常规使用。苦恼温度计(DT)最初是为癌症患者开发的,是一种检测心理困扰的简短筛查工具。然而,COPD患者的最佳临界值仍不清楚。目的:本研究旨在验证DT在稳定期COPD患者中的应用,并探讨影响心理困扰的因素。方法:对386例稳定期COPD患者进行横断面研究。数据收集使用社会人口调查问卷,DT和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定各种DT截止分数与HADS相比的预测指标。采用二元logistic回归分析确定影响心理困扰的因素。临床试验号:本横断面调查研究不涉及实验性干预,因此不需要在临床试验平台注册。然而,研究方案可从https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C3N79检索。结果:患者报告的平均DT为3.77,平均总HADS评分为29.68。DT评分与HADS总分呈高度相关(r = 0.640)。最佳DT临界值≥5,约登指数为0.815,敏感性97.40%,特异性84.14%。使用此截止分数,发现显著心理困扰的发生率为32.1%。心理困扰的危险因素包括性别、子女数量、受教育程度、运动频率、GOLD程度和急性加重次数。结论:DT是识别COPD患者心理困扰的有效筛查工具。DT的最佳临界值为≥5,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,是临床使用的可靠指标。本研究还强调了导致心理困扰的重要因素,强调了将常规心理评估和护理纳入COPD的常规管理以改善患者预后的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Distress Thermometer for detecting psychological distress in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal cut-off score and influencing factors.

Validation of the Distress Thermometer for detecting psychological distress in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal cut-off score and influencing factors.

Validation of the Distress Thermometer for detecting psychological distress in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: optimal cut-off score and influencing factors.

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at high risk for psychological distress, yet validated screening tools are not routinely used in clinical practice. The Distress Thermometer (DT), originally developed for cancer patients, is a brief screening tool for detecting psychological distress. However, the optimal cut-off in COPD patients remains unclear.

Aim: This study aims to validate the DT for use in stable COPD patients and to explore factors influencing psychological distress.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 386 stable COPD patients. Data were collected using sociodemographic questionnaires, the DT, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was employed to determine the predictive metrics of various DT cut-off scores compared to the HADS. Bivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing psychological distress.

Clinical trial number: This cross-sectional survey study did not involve experimental interventions and therefore did not require registration in a clinical trials platform. However, the study protocol can be retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/C3N79 .

Results: The mean DT reported by patients was 3.77, while the mean total HADS score was 29.68. The DT score showed a high correlation with the total HADS score (r = 0.640). An optimal DT cut-off score of ≥ 5 was identified, yielding a Youden index of 0.815, with sensitivity and specificity of 97.40% and 84.14%, respectively. Using this cut-off score, the incidence of significant psychological distress was found to be 32.1%. Risk factors for psychological distress included gender, number of children, educational level, frequency of exercise, GOLD degree, and number of acute exacerbations.

Conclusions: The DT is a valid screening tool for identifying psychological distress among COPD patients. With an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 5, the DT offers high sensitivity and specificity, making it a reliable measure for clinical use. This study also highlights significant factors contributing to psychological distress, emphasizing the importance of integrating routine psychological assessments and care into the routine management of COPD to improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信