中老年人的认知衰弱与卫生保健利用和费用:来自四项纵向队列研究的结果

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yemin Yuan, Zhenyu Shi, Xiaolong Guan, Yiqi Xia, Yanshang Wang, Huaxin Si, Ping He
{"title":"中老年人的认知衰弱与卫生保健利用和费用:来自四项纵向队列研究的结果","authors":"Yemin Yuan, Zhenyu Shi, Xiaolong Guan, Yiqi Xia, Yanshang Wang, Huaxin Si, Ping He","doi":"10.14336/AD.2025.0722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care systems need better strategies to identify older adults at risk for costly care to select target populations for interventions to reduce health care burden. Cognitive impairment and frailty are among the two most common geriatric syndromes. We examined the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Participants aged 50 and over were drawn from four prospective cohorts of aging, including the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA), the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We classified participants according to their cognitive impairment and frailty status into the following groups: none, only cognitive impairment, only frailty and cognitive frailty. We used negative binomial regression models and sample selection models to explore the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Compared to participants without cognitive impairment and frailty, participants in the only frailty or cognitive frailty groups had higher average annual outpatient visits and inpatient admissions. Only cognitive impairment was significantly negatively associated with the probability of outpatient visits or out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Only frailty was significantly associated with a higher probability of outpatient visits or more OOP costs. The association between cognitive frailty and outpatient visits varied by cohort. In KLoSA, cognitive frailty was associated with a lower probability of outpatient visits, whereas the other three cohorts show the opposite. Cognitive frailty was associated with higher outpatient costs in CHARLS, KLoSA and MHAS. Only frailty and cognitive frailty were associated with a higher likelihood of inpatient admission in each cohort, and they were also linked to higher inpatient costs in both KLoSA and SHARE. But cognitive frailty was associated with lower inpatient costs in MHAS. This study highlights the significant positive association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and OOP costs in most countries. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of cognitive impairment and frailty, healthcare providers and policymakers can work towards more effective interventions and support systems that address the needs of middle-aged and older adults, ultimately improving their quality of life and reducing health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7434,"journal":{"name":"Aging and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Frailty and Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Findings from Four Longitudinal Cohort Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Yemin Yuan, Zhenyu Shi, Xiaolong Guan, Yiqi Xia, Yanshang Wang, Huaxin Si, Ping He\",\"doi\":\"10.14336/AD.2025.0722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health care systems need better strategies to identify older adults at risk for costly care to select target populations for interventions to reduce health care burden. Cognitive impairment and frailty are among the two most common geriatric syndromes. We examined the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Participants aged 50 and over were drawn from four prospective cohorts of aging, including the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA), the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We classified participants according to their cognitive impairment and frailty status into the following groups: none, only cognitive impairment, only frailty and cognitive frailty. We used negative binomial regression models and sample selection models to explore the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Compared to participants without cognitive impairment and frailty, participants in the only frailty or cognitive frailty groups had higher average annual outpatient visits and inpatient admissions. Only cognitive impairment was significantly negatively associated with the probability of outpatient visits or out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Only frailty was significantly associated with a higher probability of outpatient visits or more OOP costs. The association between cognitive frailty and outpatient visits varied by cohort. In KLoSA, cognitive frailty was associated with a lower probability of outpatient visits, whereas the other three cohorts show the opposite. Cognitive frailty was associated with higher outpatient costs in CHARLS, KLoSA and MHAS. Only frailty and cognitive frailty were associated with a higher likelihood of inpatient admission in each cohort, and they were also linked to higher inpatient costs in both KLoSA and SHARE. But cognitive frailty was associated with lower inpatient costs in MHAS. This study highlights the significant positive association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and OOP costs in most countries. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of cognitive impairment and frailty, healthcare providers and policymakers can work towards more effective interventions and support systems that address the needs of middle-aged and older adults, ultimately improving their quality of life and reducing health care costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging and Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2025.0722\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2025.0722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生保健系统需要更好的战略来确定面临昂贵护理风险的老年人,以选择干预措施的目标人群,以减轻卫生保健负担。认知障碍和虚弱是两种最常见的老年综合征。我们研究了认知脆弱与医疗保健利用和成本之间的关系。50岁及以上的参与者来自四个前瞻性老龄化队列,包括中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)、韩国老龄化纵向研究(KLoSA)、墨西哥健康与老龄化研究(MHAS)和欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)。我们根据参与者的认知障碍和虚弱状态将他们分为以下几组:无认知障碍,只有认知障碍,只有虚弱和认知虚弱。我们采用负二项回归模型和样本选择模型来探讨认知脆弱性与医疗保健利用和成本之间的关系。与没有认知障碍和虚弱的参与者相比,只有虚弱或认知虚弱组的参与者有更高的平均年门诊访问量和住院次数。只有认知障碍与门诊就诊或自费(OOP)费用的概率显著负相关。只有虚弱与更高的门诊就诊概率或更多的OOP费用显著相关。认知衰弱和门诊就诊之间的关系因队列而异。在KLoSA中,认知衰弱与较低的门诊就诊概率相关,而其他三个队列显示相反。在CHARLS、KLoSA和MHAS中,认知衰弱与较高的门诊费用相关。在每个队列中,只有虚弱和认知虚弱与更高的住院可能性相关,并且在KLoSA和SHARE中,它们也与更高的住院费用相关。但认知衰弱与MHAS患者较低的住院费用相关。本研究强调在大多数国家,认知脆弱性与卫生保健利用和OOP成本之间存在显著的正相关关系。通过认识到认知障碍和虚弱的多面性,卫生保健提供者和政策制定者可以努力制定更有效的干预措施和支持系统,以满足中老年人的需求,最终提高他们的生活质量并降低卫生保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Frailty and Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Findings from Four Longitudinal Cohort Studies.

Health care systems need better strategies to identify older adults at risk for costly care to select target populations for interventions to reduce health care burden. Cognitive impairment and frailty are among the two most common geriatric syndromes. We examined the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Participants aged 50 and over were drawn from four prospective cohorts of aging, including the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA), the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We classified participants according to their cognitive impairment and frailty status into the following groups: none, only cognitive impairment, only frailty and cognitive frailty. We used negative binomial regression models and sample selection models to explore the association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and costs. Compared to participants without cognitive impairment and frailty, participants in the only frailty or cognitive frailty groups had higher average annual outpatient visits and inpatient admissions. Only cognitive impairment was significantly negatively associated with the probability of outpatient visits or out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Only frailty was significantly associated with a higher probability of outpatient visits or more OOP costs. The association between cognitive frailty and outpatient visits varied by cohort. In KLoSA, cognitive frailty was associated with a lower probability of outpatient visits, whereas the other three cohorts show the opposite. Cognitive frailty was associated with higher outpatient costs in CHARLS, KLoSA and MHAS. Only frailty and cognitive frailty were associated with a higher likelihood of inpatient admission in each cohort, and they were also linked to higher inpatient costs in both KLoSA and SHARE. But cognitive frailty was associated with lower inpatient costs in MHAS. This study highlights the significant positive association between cognitive frailty and health care utilization and OOP costs in most countries. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of cognitive impairment and frailty, healthcare providers and policymakers can work towards more effective interventions and support systems that address the needs of middle-aged and older adults, ultimately improving their quality of life and reducing health care costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and Disease
Aging and Disease GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Disease (A&D) is an open-access online journal dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research on the biology of aging, the pathophysiology of age-related diseases, and innovative therapies for conditions affecting the elderly. The scope encompasses various diseases such as Stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson’s disease, Epilepsy, Dementia, Depression, Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, Arthritis, Cataract, Osteoporosis, Diabetes, and Hypertension. The journal welcomes studies involving animal models as well as human tissues or cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信