特应性皮炎的药物生存期和全身治疗结果的预测因素:来自瑞典全国队列的数据。

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Pontus O Jonsson, Mahsa Tayefi, Axel Svedbom, Maria Bradley, Emma K Johansson
{"title":"特应性皮炎的药物生存期和全身治疗结果的预测因素:来自瑞典全国队列的数据。","authors":"Pontus O Jonsson, Mahsa Tayefi, Axel Svedbom, Maria Bradley, Emma K Johansson","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v105.43464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real-world data on the drug survival of established and emerging treatment options in atopic dermatitis provide a comprehensive measure of the efficacy and tolerability of these interventions, which may enable improvements in clinical management. This study aimed to describe the drug survival, with associated predictors, of treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib, cyclosporine, dupilumab, methotrexate, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib among patients with atopic dermatitis in Sweden who were recruited into the multicentre prospective SwedAD cohort between January 2017 and April 2024. A total of 1,194 patients were included with a total of 1,486 treatment episodes. The 2-year drug survival probability was 14.2% for baricitinib (treatment episodes, n = 30), 12.2% for cyclosporine (n = 40), 79.7% for dupilumab (n = 1,026), 45.4% for methotrexate (n = 260), and 46.0% for upadacitinib (n = 89). Two-year follow-up data were not available for abrocitinib (n = 23) or tralokinumab (n = 18). All drugs were compared with the most used conventional systemic treatment at study baseline, methotrexate, using Cox regression. Only dupilumab showed a significantly lower hazard rate of drug discontinuation. In conclusion, dupilumab therapy demonstrated longer drug survival than methotrexate in atopic dermatitis. The impact of national treatment guidelines and time since drug approval should be considered when interpreting the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":"105 ","pages":"adv43464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Survival and Predictors of Systemic Treatment Outcome in Atopic Dermatitis: Data From a Nationwide Swedish Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Pontus O Jonsson, Mahsa Tayefi, Axel Svedbom, Maria Bradley, Emma K Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/actadv.v105.43464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Real-world data on the drug survival of established and emerging treatment options in atopic dermatitis provide a comprehensive measure of the efficacy and tolerability of these interventions, which may enable improvements in clinical management. This study aimed to describe the drug survival, with associated predictors, of treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib, cyclosporine, dupilumab, methotrexate, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib among patients with atopic dermatitis in Sweden who were recruited into the multicentre prospective SwedAD cohort between January 2017 and April 2024. A total of 1,194 patients were included with a total of 1,486 treatment episodes. The 2-year drug survival probability was 14.2% for baricitinib (treatment episodes, n = 30), 12.2% for cyclosporine (n = 40), 79.7% for dupilumab (n = 1,026), 45.4% for methotrexate (n = 260), and 46.0% for upadacitinib (n = 89). Two-year follow-up data were not available for abrocitinib (n = 23) or tralokinumab (n = 18). All drugs were compared with the most used conventional systemic treatment at study baseline, methotrexate, using Cox regression. Only dupilumab showed a significantly lower hazard rate of drug discontinuation. In conclusion, dupilumab therapy demonstrated longer drug survival than methotrexate in atopic dermatitis. The impact of national treatment guidelines and time since drug approval should be considered when interpreting the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"adv43464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta dermato-venereologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.43464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.43464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于特应性皮炎的现有和新出现的治疗方案的药物生存的真实数据提供了这些干预措施的疗效和耐受性的综合衡量标准,这可能有助于改善临床管理。本研究旨在描述2017年1月至2024年4月期间瑞典特应性皮炎患者接受阿布替尼、巴西替尼、环孢素、杜匹单抗、甲氨蝶呤、曲洛单抗和upadacitinib治疗的药物生存期及相关预测因素。共纳入1194例患者,共1486次治疗。baricitinib的2年药物生存率为14.2%(治疗次数,n = 30),环孢素12.2% (n = 40), dupilumab 79.7% (n = 1,026),甲氨蝶呤45.4% (n = 260), upadacitinib 46.0% (n = 89)。abrocitinib (n = 23)或tralokinumab (n = 18)的两年随访数据不可用。使用Cox回归将所有药物与研究基线时最常用的常规全身治疗甲氨蝶呤进行比较。只有杜匹单抗显示出明显较低的停药危险率。总之,在特应性皮炎中,dupilumab治疗比甲氨蝶呤治疗的药物生存期更长。在解释结果时应考虑国家治疗指南的影响和药物批准的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drug Survival and Predictors of Systemic Treatment Outcome in Atopic Dermatitis: Data From a Nationwide Swedish Cohort.

Drug Survival and Predictors of Systemic Treatment Outcome in Atopic Dermatitis: Data From a Nationwide Swedish Cohort.

Real-world data on the drug survival of established and emerging treatment options in atopic dermatitis provide a comprehensive measure of the efficacy and tolerability of these interventions, which may enable improvements in clinical management. This study aimed to describe the drug survival, with associated predictors, of treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib, cyclosporine, dupilumab, methotrexate, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib among patients with atopic dermatitis in Sweden who were recruited into the multicentre prospective SwedAD cohort between January 2017 and April 2024. A total of 1,194 patients were included with a total of 1,486 treatment episodes. The 2-year drug survival probability was 14.2% for baricitinib (treatment episodes, n = 30), 12.2% for cyclosporine (n = 40), 79.7% for dupilumab (n = 1,026), 45.4% for methotrexate (n = 260), and 46.0% for upadacitinib (n = 89). Two-year follow-up data were not available for abrocitinib (n = 23) or tralokinumab (n = 18). All drugs were compared with the most used conventional systemic treatment at study baseline, methotrexate, using Cox regression. Only dupilumab showed a significantly lower hazard rate of drug discontinuation. In conclusion, dupilumab therapy demonstrated longer drug survival than methotrexate in atopic dermatitis. The impact of national treatment guidelines and time since drug approval should be considered when interpreting the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信