即刻加载无瓣微型种植体用于全弓覆盖义齿修复:一项长达15年的回顾性研究。

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gerardo Pellegrino,Zoran Zaccheroni,Subhi Tayeb,Andrea Oliverio,Edoardo Mancuso,Lorenzo Bonifazi,Amerigo Giudice,Carlo Barausse,Pietro Felice
{"title":"即刻加载无瓣微型种植体用于全弓覆盖义齿修复:一项长达15年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Gerardo Pellegrino,Zoran Zaccheroni,Subhi Tayeb,Andrea Oliverio,Edoardo Mancuso,Lorenzo Bonifazi,Amerigo Giudice,Carlo Barausse,Pietro Felice","doi":"10.1111/clr.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nThis study aimed to evaluate the survival rates of Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) placed in both the maxilla and the mandible, and their associated overdenture prostheses in edentulous patients over short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up periods.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nPatients rehabilitated with Mini Dental Implants (diameter ≤ 2.9 mm) as support for overdenture prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years were included in the study. Data from eligible patients were collected, and marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed for each implant. The primary outcomes for the prostheses and implants included failure rates, complications, and implant-related MBL.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe study analyzed 83 patients and 334 implants over an 8.09 ± 3.96-year mean follow-up. The cumulative implant survival rate at 15 years was 86.3% (95% CI: 79.5%-91.0%). Mean MBL increased from 0.09 ± 0.44 mm at implant placement to 1.79 ± 0.82 mm at 15 years, with Lodi Biomax implants exhibiting significantly lower annual bone loss compared to Dentatus Atlas implants (p < 0.001). The prosthetic survival rate was 95.45% (95% CI: 91.1-99.81). Longer follow-up (p = 0.018) and fewer adjustments (p < 0.001) reduced risks of complication occurrence. Additionally, Lodi Biomax implants had fewer complications compared to Dentatus Atlas (p = 0.039).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nMini Dental Implants with a diameter between 2.4 and 3 mm showed high survival rates over follow-ups of up to 15 years. Their use offers a viable prosthetic solution for edentulous patients, minimizing surgical invasiveness, rehabilitation time, and costs, particularly when a fixed prosthesis is either not feasible or not requested by the patient.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flapless Mini Implants Immediately Loaded for Full-Arch Overdenture Rehabilitation: An Up-To-15-Year Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Pellegrino,Zoran Zaccheroni,Subhi Tayeb,Andrea Oliverio,Edoardo Mancuso,Lorenzo Bonifazi,Amerigo Giudice,Carlo Barausse,Pietro Felice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nThis study aimed to evaluate the survival rates of Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) placed in both the maxilla and the mandible, and their associated overdenture prostheses in edentulous patients over short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up periods.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nPatients rehabilitated with Mini Dental Implants (diameter ≤ 2.9 mm) as support for overdenture prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years were included in the study. Data from eligible patients were collected, and marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed for each implant. The primary outcomes for the prostheses and implants included failure rates, complications, and implant-related MBL.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe study analyzed 83 patients and 334 implants over an 8.09 ± 3.96-year mean follow-up. The cumulative implant survival rate at 15 years was 86.3% (95% CI: 79.5%-91.0%). Mean MBL increased from 0.09 ± 0.44 mm at implant placement to 1.79 ± 0.82 mm at 15 years, with Lodi Biomax implants exhibiting significantly lower annual bone loss compared to Dentatus Atlas implants (p < 0.001). The prosthetic survival rate was 95.45% (95% CI: 91.1-99.81). Longer follow-up (p = 0.018) and fewer adjustments (p < 0.001) reduced risks of complication occurrence. Additionally, Lodi Biomax implants had fewer complications compared to Dentatus Atlas (p = 0.039).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nMini Dental Implants with a diameter between 2.4 and 3 mm showed high survival rates over follow-ups of up to 15 years. Their use offers a viable prosthetic solution for edentulous patients, minimizing surgical invasiveness, rehabilitation time, and costs, particularly when a fixed prosthesis is either not feasible or not requested by the patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70017\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过短期、中期和长期随访评估无牙患者在上颌和下颌骨放置微型牙种植体(mdi)及其相关覆盖义齿的生存率。材料与方法采用微型种植体(直径≤2.9 mm)作为覆盖义齿支撑的患者,随访时间至少为3年。收集符合条件的患者的数据,并评估每个种植体的边际骨损失(MBL)。假体和种植体的主要结局包括失败率、并发症和种植体相关的MBL。结果在8.09±3.96年的平均随访期间,研究分析了83例患者和334个种植体。15年累积种植体存活率为86.3% (95% CI: 79.5%-91.0%)。平均MBL从植入时的0.09±0.44 mm增加到15年时的1.79±0.82 mm, Lodi Biomax种植体的年骨损失明显低于Dentatus Atlas种植体(p < 0.001)。假体存活率为95.45% (95% CI: 91.1-99.81)。较长的随访时间(p = 0.018)和较少的调整(p < 0.001)降低了并发症发生的风险。此外,Lodi Biomax种植体与Dentatus Atlas相比并发症较少(p = 0.039)。结论直径为2.4 ~ 3mm的微型种植体术后随访15年生存率较高。它们的使用为无牙患者提供了一种可行的假体解决方案,最大限度地减少了手术侵入性、康复时间和成本,特别是当固定假体不可行或患者不要求固定假体时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flapless Mini Implants Immediately Loaded for Full-Arch Overdenture Rehabilitation: An Up-To-15-Year Retrospective Study.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the survival rates of Mini Dental Implants (MDIs) placed in both the maxilla and the mandible, and their associated overdenture prostheses in edentulous patients over short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up periods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients rehabilitated with Mini Dental Implants (diameter ≤ 2.9 mm) as support for overdenture prostheses with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years were included in the study. Data from eligible patients were collected, and marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed for each implant. The primary outcomes for the prostheses and implants included failure rates, complications, and implant-related MBL. RESULTS The study analyzed 83 patients and 334 implants over an 8.09 ± 3.96-year mean follow-up. The cumulative implant survival rate at 15 years was 86.3% (95% CI: 79.5%-91.0%). Mean MBL increased from 0.09 ± 0.44 mm at implant placement to 1.79 ± 0.82 mm at 15 years, with Lodi Biomax implants exhibiting significantly lower annual bone loss compared to Dentatus Atlas implants (p < 0.001). The prosthetic survival rate was 95.45% (95% CI: 91.1-99.81). Longer follow-up (p = 0.018) and fewer adjustments (p < 0.001) reduced risks of complication occurrence. Additionally, Lodi Biomax implants had fewer complications compared to Dentatus Atlas (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION Mini Dental Implants with a diameter between 2.4 and 3 mm showed high survival rates over follow-ups of up to 15 years. Their use offers a viable prosthetic solution for edentulous patients, minimizing surgical invasiveness, rehabilitation time, and costs, particularly when a fixed prosthesis is either not feasible or not requested by the patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信