Jessie Urban, Jaden Berger, Yamungu Botha, Gloria Boafo-Mensah, Joan Khalifa, Aubrey Mkwate, Ferdinand Tornyie, Kofi Ampomah-Benefo, Patience Agbedor, Nathan Bogonko, Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*,
{"title":"量化马拉维、加纳和肯尼亚使用传统木柴和木炭炉烹饪的效率和燃料消耗。","authors":"Jessie Urban, Jaden Berger, Yamungu Botha, Gloria Boafo-Mensah, Joan Khalifa, Aubrey Mkwate, Ferdinand Tornyie, Kofi Ampomah-Benefo, Patience Agbedor, Nathan Bogonko, Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c03702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 32","pages":"16913–16922"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Efficiency and Fuel Consumption of Cooking with Traditional Wood and Charcoal Stoves in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Urban, Jaden Berger, Yamungu Botha, Gloria Boafo-Mensah, Joan Khalifa, Aubrey Mkwate, Ferdinand Tornyie, Kofi Ampomah-Benefo, Patience Agbedor, Nathan Bogonko, Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c03702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 32\",\"pages\":\"16913–16922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c03702\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c03702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying the Efficiency and Fuel Consumption of Cooking with Traditional Wood and Charcoal Stoves in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya
Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.