量化马拉维、加纳和肯尼亚使用传统木柴和木炭炉烹饪的效率和燃料消耗。

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jessie Urban, Jaden Berger, Yamungu Botha, Gloria Boafo-Mensah, Joan Khalifa, Aubrey Mkwate, Ferdinand Tornyie, Kofi Ampomah-Benefo, Patience Agbedor, Nathan Bogonko, Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*, 
{"title":"量化马拉维、加纳和肯尼亚使用传统木柴和木炭炉烹饪的效率和燃料消耗。","authors":"Jessie Urban,&nbsp;Jaden Berger,&nbsp;Yamungu Botha,&nbsp;Gloria Boafo-Mensah,&nbsp;Joan Khalifa,&nbsp;Aubrey Mkwate,&nbsp;Ferdinand Tornyie,&nbsp;Kofi Ampomah-Benefo,&nbsp;Patience Agbedor,&nbsp;Nathan Bogonko,&nbsp;Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c03702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 32","pages":"16913–16922"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Efficiency and Fuel Consumption of Cooking with Traditional Wood and Charcoal Stoves in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Urban,&nbsp;Jaden Berger,&nbsp;Yamungu Botha,&nbsp;Gloria Boafo-Mensah,&nbsp;Joan Khalifa,&nbsp;Aubrey Mkwate,&nbsp;Ferdinand Tornyie,&nbsp;Kofi Ampomah-Benefo,&nbsp;Patience Agbedor,&nbsp;Nathan Bogonko,&nbsp;Samuel Bentson and Nordica MacCarty*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c03702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 32\",\"pages\":\"16913–16922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c03702\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c03702","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

清洁烹饪项目的碳减排和其他基于结果的融资决定在很大程度上取决于新技术带来的燃料节约。历史上,这种计算是基于在实验室中测量的传统设备和新设备之间的热效率差异。然而,效率因技术和操作因素而异,这些因素只能通过现场测量来准确计算。在这项研究中,开发并实施了一项不受控制的烹饪效率测试(UCET),以测量准备饭菜时的基准效率和燃料消耗,计划总共进行360次木炭炉测试和360次木炉测试。结果显示,传统木材炉灶的平均热效率为11.8±5.3%,传统木炭炉灶的平均热效率为22.1±9.8%,与《联合国气候变化框架公约》之前和当前的基准值(木材炉灶为10%和15%,木炭炉灶为20%和25%)非常吻合。单餐燃料使用量外推为0.17±0.07吨/人均/年木材和0.04±0.02吨/人均/年木炭,与《联合国气候变化框架公约》的全球默认值0.4吨/人均/年木材相比,这是保守的。多元回归分析表明,效率与火力、锅/锅尺寸和烹饪方法有很强的统计关联。结果表明,UCET在评估家庭炉灶效率和燃料消耗方面的效用,可以更准确地支持减排的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying the Efficiency and Fuel Consumption of Cooking with Traditional Wood and Charcoal Stoves in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya

Quantifying the Efficiency and Fuel Consumption of Cooking with Traditional Wood and Charcoal Stoves in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya

Carbon emission reductions and other results-based financing determinations for clean cooking projects are heavily dependent on the fuel savings generated by a new technology. Historically this calculation is based on the difference in thermal efficiency between the traditional and new device measured in the laboratory. However, efficiency varies with technological and operational factors that can be accurately accounted for only by field-based measurements. In this research, an uncontrolled cooking efficiency test (UCET) was developed and implemented to measure baseline efficiency and fuel consumption during meal preparation for a planned total of 360 charcoal stove tests and 360 wood stove tests. Results show average thermal efficiencies of 11.8 ± 5.3% for traditional wood and 22.1 ± 9.8% for traditional charcoal cookstoves, demonstrating good agreement with the previous and current UNFCCC baseline values of 10% and 15% for wood and 20% and 25% for charcoal. Single meal fuel use was extrapolated to 0.17 ± 0.07 tonnes/capita/year of wood and 0.04 ± 0.02 tonnes/capita/year of charcoal, conservative compared to the UNFCCC global default of 0.4 tonnes of wood/capita/year. Multiple regression analysis indicated a strong statistical association of efficiency with firepower, pot/pan dimensions, and the cooking method. Results demonstrate the utility of the UCET for evaluating cookstove efficiency and fuel consumption in households to more accurately support the determination of emissions reductions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信