[老年人的关系期望和孤独:一项定性研究]。

Eric Schoenmakers
{"title":"[老年人的关系期望和孤独:一项定性研究]。","authors":"Eric Schoenmakers","doi":"10.54195/tgg19121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive discrepancy theory defines loneliness as the experienced discrepancy between the desired or needed (quality of) relationships and the achieved ones. This assumes that people have relationship expectations that need to be met in order to avoid loneliness. This study examines quantitative and qualitative relationship expectations of older adults, for which the 'social relationships expectations framework' by Akhter-Kahn et al.1 serves as an important starting point. Semi-structured interviews about loneliness and relationship expectations were conducted among older adults (ages 62-93 years; N=18). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The results show that partners are typically considered to be the most important social relationships, followed by children and grandchildren, friends and brothers and sisters, and other relations. A high contact frequency, availability, closeness, provision of care and support, intimacy, and fun is expected from the most important social relationships. Availability when needed, fun and distraction are expected of less important social relationships. Relationship expectations change over time and as a result of social circumstances. Implications for loneliness interventions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101340,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","volume":"56 1","pages":"2-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Relationship expectations and loneliness in older adults: A qualitative study].\",\"authors\":\"Eric Schoenmakers\",\"doi\":\"10.54195/tgg19121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive discrepancy theory defines loneliness as the experienced discrepancy between the desired or needed (quality of) relationships and the achieved ones. This assumes that people have relationship expectations that need to be met in order to avoid loneliness. This study examines quantitative and qualitative relationship expectations of older adults, for which the 'social relationships expectations framework' by Akhter-Kahn et al.1 serves as an important starting point. Semi-structured interviews about loneliness and relationship expectations were conducted among older adults (ages 62-93 years; N=18). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The results show that partners are typically considered to be the most important social relationships, followed by children and grandchildren, friends and brothers and sisters, and other relations. A high contact frequency, availability, closeness, provision of care and support, intimacy, and fun is expected from the most important social relationships. Availability when needed, fun and distraction are expected of less important social relationships. Relationship expectations change over time and as a result of social circumstances. Implications for loneliness interventions are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"2-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54195/tgg19121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/tgg19121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知差异理论将孤独定义为期望或需要的(质量)关系与已实现的关系之间的经验差异。这是假设人们有需要满足的关系期望,以避免孤独。本研究考察了老年人的定量和定性关系期望,其中akter - kahn等人的“社会关系期望框架”是一个重要的起点。对老年人(62-93岁;N = 18)。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。结果显示,伴侣通常被认为是最重要的社会关系,其次是子女和孙辈、朋友和兄弟姐妹,以及其他关系。人们期望从最重要的社会关系中获得高频率的接触、可用性、亲近感、提供关怀和支持、亲密感和乐趣。在不太重要的社交关系中,人们期望在需要的时候可以获得可用性、乐趣和分散注意力。人际关系期望值会随着时间和社会环境的变化而变化。讨论了孤独感干预的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Relationship expectations and loneliness in older adults: A qualitative study].

Cognitive discrepancy theory defines loneliness as the experienced discrepancy between the desired or needed (quality of) relationships and the achieved ones. This assumes that people have relationship expectations that need to be met in order to avoid loneliness. This study examines quantitative and qualitative relationship expectations of older adults, for which the 'social relationships expectations framework' by Akhter-Kahn et al.1 serves as an important starting point. Semi-structured interviews about loneliness and relationship expectations were conducted among older adults (ages 62-93 years; N=18). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The results show that partners are typically considered to be the most important social relationships, followed by children and grandchildren, friends and brothers and sisters, and other relations. A high contact frequency, availability, closeness, provision of care and support, intimacy, and fun is expected from the most important social relationships. Availability when needed, fun and distraction are expected of less important social relationships. Relationship expectations change over time and as a result of social circumstances. Implications for loneliness interventions are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信