[临床伦理支持与CURA。老年医学和姑息医学从业人员的可接受性和可行性[j]。

Lieke M Swart, Malene V van Schaik, Charlotte C S Garstman, Eefje M Sizoo, Suzanne Metselaar
{"title":"[临床伦理支持与CURA。老年医学和姑息医学从业人员的可接受性和可行性[j]。","authors":"Lieke M Swart, Malene V van Schaik, Charlotte C S Garstman, Eefje M Sizoo, Suzanne Metselaar","doi":"10.54195/tgg19019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Moral conflicts are common within geriatric and palliative care and can lead to moral distress. Clinical ethics support helps healthcare providers in managing moral conflicts and moral distress. CURA is a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument. The feasibility for nurses and nurse-assistants in palliative care has already been investigated. However, the acceptability and feasibility of CURA within medical practitioners is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study, using mixed methods. Participants are medical practitioners working in geriatric or palliative care, who attended a workshop on CURA. They received a baseline questionnaire (n=41) after the workshop regarding acceptability and a follow-up questionnaire (n=22) after three months regarding feasibility. Additionally, in-depth interviews (n=7) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>68% of participants expressed intention to use CURA at baseline; 32% were uncertain. 14% has actually used CURA after three months. Feasibility is dependent of several factors: (1) recognizing a moral situation; (2) familiarity with the methodology; (3) scheduling a CURA moment; (4) the role of colleagues and the healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whereas CURA is an acceptable tool for medical practitioners, feasibility is found to be low if practitioners do not receive additional training and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":101340,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","volume":"55 3","pages":"2-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical ethics support with CURA. Acceptability and feasibility among medical practitioners in geriatric and palliative medicine].\",\"authors\":\"Lieke M Swart, Malene V van Schaik, Charlotte C S Garstman, Eefje M Sizoo, Suzanne Metselaar\",\"doi\":\"10.54195/tgg19019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Moral conflicts are common within geriatric and palliative care and can lead to moral distress. Clinical ethics support helps healthcare providers in managing moral conflicts and moral distress. CURA is a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument. The feasibility for nurses and nurse-assistants in palliative care has already been investigated. However, the acceptability and feasibility of CURA within medical practitioners is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study, using mixed methods. Participants are medical practitioners working in geriatric or palliative care, who attended a workshop on CURA. They received a baseline questionnaire (n=41) after the workshop regarding acceptability and a follow-up questionnaire (n=22) after three months regarding feasibility. Additionally, in-depth interviews (n=7) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>68% of participants expressed intention to use CURA at baseline; 32% were uncertain. 14% has actually used CURA after three months. Feasibility is dependent of several factors: (1) recognizing a moral situation; (2) familiarity with the methodology; (3) scheduling a CURA moment; (4) the role of colleagues and the healthcare organization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whereas CURA is an acceptable tool for medical practitioners, feasibility is found to be low if practitioners do not receive additional training and support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"2-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54195/tgg19019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/tgg19019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德冲突在老年和姑息治疗中很常见,并可能导致道德困扰。临床伦理支持帮助医疗保健提供者管理道德冲突和道德困境。CURA是一个低门槛的临床伦理支持工具。护士和护士助理在姑息治疗方面的可行性已经进行了调查。然而,CURA在医疗从业者中的可接受性和可行性尚不清楚。方法:采用混合方法进行前瞻性队列研究。参与者是在老年或姑息治疗领域工作的医生,他们参加了一个关于CURA的讲习班。他们在研讨会后收到了一份关于可接受性的基线问卷(n=41),在三个月后收到了一份关于可行性的后续问卷(n=22)。此外,还进行了深度访谈(n=7)。结果:68%的参与者在基线时表示有意使用CURA;32%的人不确定。14%的人在三个月后使用了CURA。可行性取决于几个因素:(1)认识到道德状况;(2)熟悉研究方法;(3)调度CURA时刻;(4)同事和医疗机构的作用。结论:虽然CURA是一种可接受的医疗从业者工具,但如果从业者没有得到额外的培训和支持,其可行性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical ethics support with CURA. Acceptability and feasibility among medical practitioners in geriatric and palliative medicine].

Introduction: Moral conflicts are common within geriatric and palliative care and can lead to moral distress. Clinical ethics support helps healthcare providers in managing moral conflicts and moral distress. CURA is a low-threshold clinical ethics support instrument. The feasibility for nurses and nurse-assistants in palliative care has already been investigated. However, the acceptability and feasibility of CURA within medical practitioners is unclear.

Methods: Prospective cohort study, using mixed methods. Participants are medical practitioners working in geriatric or palliative care, who attended a workshop on CURA. They received a baseline questionnaire (n=41) after the workshop regarding acceptability and a follow-up questionnaire (n=22) after three months regarding feasibility. Additionally, in-depth interviews (n=7) were conducted.

Results: 68% of participants expressed intention to use CURA at baseline; 32% were uncertain. 14% has actually used CURA after three months. Feasibility is dependent of several factors: (1) recognizing a moral situation; (2) familiarity with the methodology; (3) scheduling a CURA moment; (4) the role of colleagues and the healthcare organization.

Conclusion: Whereas CURA is an acceptable tool for medical practitioners, feasibility is found to be low if practitioners do not receive additional training and support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信